Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¹Ì¼¼Àý°³ ¹é³»Àå ¼ö¼ú¿¡ »ç¿ëÇÑ µµ¼ö¿¡ µû¶ó Å©±â°¡ ´Ù¸¥ Àΰø¼öÁ¤Ã¼ÀÇ Å©±â¿¡ µû¸¥ ÀÓ»ó°á°ú Comparison of Clinical Outcomes between Different IOL Sizes after Microincisional Cataract Surgery

´ëÇѾȰúÇÐȸÁö 2011³â 52±Ç 11È£ p.1281 ~ 1285
ÀÌ°æ¼·, ±èÀçÇü, ÀÌÁÖÀº, ±èÀç¿ë, ±è¸íÁØ, Â÷Èï¿ø,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
ÀÌ°æ¼· ( Lee Kyoung-Sub ) 
¿ï»ê´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¼­¿ï¾Æ»êº´¿ø ¾È°úÇб³½Ç

±èÀçÇü ( Kim Jae-Hyung ) 
¿ï»ê´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¼­¿ï¾Æ»êº´¿ø ¾È°úÇб³½Ç
ÀÌÁÖÀº ( Lee Joo-Eun ) 
¿ï»ê´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¼­¿ï¾Æ»êº´¿ø ¾È°úÇб³½Ç
±èÀç¿ë ( Kim Jae-Yong ) 
¿ï»ê´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¼­¿ï¾Æ»êº´¿ø ¾È°úÇб³½Ç
±è¸íÁØ ( Kim Myoung-Joon ) 
¿ï»ê´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¼­¿ï¾Æ»êº´¿ø ¾È°úÇб³½Ç
Â÷Èï¿ø ( Tchah Hung-Won ) 
¿ï»ê´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¼­¿ï¾Æ»êº´¿ø ¾È°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract

¸ñ Àû : ¹Ì¼¼°¢¸·Àý°³ ¼ö¼ú¿ë Àΰø¼öÁ¤Ã¼ÀÎ Akreos MI-60¢âÀÇ Å©±â¿¡ µû¸¥ ÀÓ»ó°á°ú¸¦ ºñ±³ÇÏ¿´´Ù.

´ë»ó°ú ¹æ¹ý : µµ¼ö¿¡ µû¶ó Å©±â°¡ ´Ù¸¥ Àΰø¼öÁ¤Ã¼¸¦ »ðÀÔÇÑ ÃÑ 68¸í 68¾ÈÀÇ È¯ÀÚ¸¦ ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ÈÄÇâÀû Àǹ«±â·Ï °Ë»ç¸¦ ÅëÇØ ¿¬±¸ÇÏ¿´ ´Ù. 38¾ÈÀº 15.5-22.0D (±¤ÇкΠ6.0 mm Àüü Áö¸§ 10.7 mm) 1±ºÀ¸·Î 30¾ÈÀº 22.5-30.0D (±¤ÇкΠ5.6 mm Àüü Áö¸§ 10.5 m)¸¦ 2±ºÀ¸ ·Î ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÀÌ È¯ÀÚµéÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ¼ú Àü ¹× ¼ú ÈÄ ÃÖ´ë±³Á¤½Ã·Â, ±¼ÀýÀÌ»ó ¹× Àü¹æ ±íÀÌ µîÀ» ÃøÁ¤ÇÏ¿´´Ù. À̸¦ °¢ ±ºº°·Î ºñ±³ÇÏ¿´´Ù.

°á °ú : ¼ú ÈÄ 6°³¿ùÀÇ ÃÖ´ë ±³Á¤½Ã·ÂÀº 1±º¿¡¼­ 0.08 ¡¾ 0.10D 2±º¿¡¼­ 0.07 ¡¾ 0.11D¿´´Ù. ±¸¸é´ëÀÀÄ¡´Â 1±º¿¡¼­ -0.32 ¡¾ 0.65D 2±º¿¡ ¼­ -0.16 ¡¾ 0.59D¿´´Ù(p£¾0.05). ¼ú ÈÄ ½Ç½ÃÇÑ Àü¹æ±íÀÌ°Ë»ç ¹× ±¸¸é´ëÀÀÄ¡´Â ±â°£¿¡ µû¸¥ º¯È­¸¦ º¸ÀÌÁö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù(p£¾0.05).

°á ·Ð : µµ¼ö¿¡ µû¶ó Å©±â°¡ ´Ù¸¥ Akreos MI-60 Àΰø¼öÁ¤Ã¼´Â ±× Å©±âÀÇ º¯È­¿¡ µû¸¥ ½Ã±â´É ¹× ¾ÈÁ¤¼º¿¡¼­ Â÷ÀÌ°¡ ¾ø¾ú´Ù.

Purpose: To compare clinical outcomes between different IOL sizes after microincisional cataract surgery.
Methods: Retrospective chart review was done in 68 eyes of 68 patients who underwent phacoemulsification and implantation with two different-sized aspheric IOLs (AKREOS MI60 Bausch & Lomb, Inc., Rochester, NY). The patients were divided into 2 groups: group I consisted of 38 eyes between 15.5-22.0 diopter (D) (optic size 6.0 mm, overall size 10.7 mm), and group II consisted of 30 eyes between 22.5-30.0 D (optic size 5.6 mm, overall size 10.5 mm). The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), refractive error, and anterior chamber depth (ACD) were measured preoperatively and postoperatively and were compared between groups.

Results: Postoperative 6 month BCVA was 0.08 ¡¾ 0.10 D in group I and 0.07 ¡¾ 0.11 D in group II. During the same period, the spherical equivalent was -0.32 ¡¾ 0.65 D in group I and -0.16 ¡¾ 0.59 D in group II (p > 0.05). There were no significant differences in ACD or refractive error during the postoperative period (p > 0.05).

Conclusions: Comparison of postoperative visual acuity and spherical equivalent between different sizes of Akreos MI-60¢â IOLs showed no differences.

Å°¿öµå

Akreos MI60;Aspheric intraocular lens;Microincision cataract surgery

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed
KAMS