Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Comparative Proteome Analysis of Two Antagonist Bacillus subtilis Strains

Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 2009³â 19±Ç 4È£ p.351 ~ 357
Zhang C.X., Zhao X., Han F., Yang M.F., Chen H., Chida T., Shen S.H.,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
 ( Zhang C.X. ) 
Chinese Academy of Sciences Institute of Botany

 ( Zhao X. ) 
Chinese Academy of Sciences Institute of Botany
 ( Han F. ) 
Chinese Academy of Sciences Institute of Botany
 ( Yang M.F. ) 
Chinese Academy of Sciences Institute of Botany
 ( Chen H. ) 
Chinese Academy of Sciences Institute of Botany
 ( Chida T. ) 
Japan Chemicals Agrochemicals Planning and Development Department
 ( Shen S.H. ) 
Chinese Academy of Sciences Institute of Botany

Abstract


Natural wild-type strains of Bacillus subtilis are extensively used in agriculture as biocontrol agents for plants. This study examined two antagonist B. subtilis strains, KB-1111 and KB-1122, and the results illustrated that KB-1122 was a more potent inhibitor of the indicator pathogen than KB- 1111. Thus, to investigate the intrinsic differences between the two antagonist strains under normal culture conditions, samples of KB-1111 and KB-1122 were analyzed using MALDI-TOF-MS. The main differences were related to 20 abundant intracellular and 17 extracellular proteins. When searching the NCBI database, a number of the differentially expressed proteins were identified, including 11 cellular proteins and 10 secretory proteins. Among these proteins, class III stress-response-related ATPase, aconitate hydratase, alpha-amylase precursor, and a secretory protein, endo-1, 4-beta-glucanase, were differentially expressed by the two strains. These results are useful to comprehend the intrinsic diferrences between the antagonism of KB-1111 and KB-1122.

Å°¿öµå

Bacillus subtilis;Magnaporthe grisea P131;in vitro antifungal activity;proteomics;2DE-PAGE

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

SCI(E)
MEDLINE
KCI