Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ôÃßÃø¸¸Áõ ȯÀÚÀÇ Ã´Ã߸¸°îµµ¿¡ °üÇÑ °íÂû Investingation on the Relationship Scoliotic Curve and BMI, Cervical Lordosis Lumar Lordosis and Ferguson Angle in Spinal Scoliosis Patient

ôÃ߽ŰæÃß³ªÀÇÇÐȸÁö 2006³â 1±Ç 2È£ p.93 ~ 100
ÀÌ»óÈ£, À±À¯¼®, ¿ìÀÎ, ÇÏÀÎÇõ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
ÀÌ»óÈ£ ( Lee Sang-Ho ) 
ÀÚ»ýÇѹ溴¿ø ôÃßÃß³ª°ú

À±À¯¼® ( Youn You-Suk ) 
ÀÚ»ýÇѹ溴¿ø ÇѹæÀçÈ°ÀÇÇаú±³½Ç
¿ìÀΠ( Woo In ) 
ÀÚ»ýÇѹ溴¿ø ÇѹæÀçÈ°ÀÇÇаú±³½Ç
ÇÏÀÎÇõ ( Ha In-Hyuk ) 
ÀÚ»ýÇѹ溴¿ø ÇѹæÀçÈ°ÀÇÇаú±³½Ç

Abstract


Objectives: To invesgate correlation between the scoliotic curve and BMI, cervical lordosis, lumbar lordosis and Ferguson angle in spinal scoliotic patient.

Methods: The study was composed of 14 scoliosis patients beyond cobb¡¯a angle (sample I group) and 15 scoliosis patients over cobb¡¯a angle (sample II group). The patients were evaluated with X-ray findings of full spine AP and lateral views and statistically analyzed.

Results: 1. Sample II group showed a significant decrease in BMI as compared with Sample I group(P<0.05). 2. Scoliotic curve had s negative relationship with 3. Scolotic patients had a lower cervical angle than normal man.
Conclusion: 1. The larger the scoliotic angle, the lower BMI 2. There are no concemed scoliotic curve and cervical lordosis, lumbar lordosis and Ferguson angle.

Å°¿öµå

Scoliosis; BMI;Cervical Lordosis;Lumbar Lordosis;Ferguson angle

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI