Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Ç×¹®³»¾ÐÀÇ ¹æ»ç»ó ºñ´ëĪµµ¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ Ç×¹®°ý¾à±Ù ¼Õ»óÀÇ Áø´Ü Diagnosis of Anal Sphincter Injuries by Manometric Radial Asymmetry

´ëÇÑ´ëÀåÇ×¹®ÇÐȸÁö 1999³â 15±Ç 2È£ p.131 ~ 136
¼º¹«°æ, Â÷Çüȯ, ¹Ú¿õä,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
¼º¹«°æ ( Seong Moo-Kyung ) 
°Ç±¹´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç

Â÷Çüȯ ( Cha Young-Hwan ) 
°Ç±¹´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
¹Ú¿õä ( Park Ung-Chae ) 
°Ç±¹´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract


Purpose: This study was undertaken to evaluate how well anorectal manometry diagnose anal sphincter injury, especially with regard to the parameter of radial asymmetry.

Methods: Anorectal manometry were performed in 27 male patients with anal fistula of transsphincteric type. The postoperative values of each manometric parameter including radial asymmetry (RA) were compared with preoperative ones. And also, the association between the sites of functional defect assessed by cross-sectional pressure data under station pull-through (SPT) technique and those of anatomical defect made by fistulotomy operation were determined.

Results: Under rapid pull-through (RPT) technique, maximum resting pressure (MRP); 113.1 21.3 mmHg (preoperative value) vs 68.0 18.5 mmHg (p=.000) (postoperative value), RA of MRP; 16.7 3.7% vs 24.1 7.5% (p=.002), Maximum squeeze pressures (MSP); 199.0 35.2 mmHg, 169.6 48.7 mmHg (p=.006), RA of MSP; 15.5 3.7%, 22.8 3.5% (p=.000). Under SPT technique, MRP; 100.4 39.5 mmHg vs 71.2 34.6 mmHg (p=.000), RA of MRP; 16.3 7.9% vs 24.2 10.8% (p=.026), MSP; 299.1 71.6 mmHg vs 231.4 90.3 mmHg (p=.004), RA of MSP; 13.0 6.1% vs 22.0 8.4% (p=.001). Sites of functional defects interpreted upon SPT data were coincidental with sites of anatomical defects made by fistulotomy in 88.9% (MRP) and 92.6%
(MSP) of cases.

Conclusion: Manometric radial asymmetry could be a useful parameter in diagnosing anal sphincter injury and locating the site of defect.

Å°¿öµå

Anal sphincter injury;Anorectal manometry;Radial asymmetry

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed
KAMS