Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¸¸¼º º¯ºñÀÇ Áø´ÜÀ» À§ÇÑ ´ëÀåÇ×¹® ±â´É°Ë»çÀÇ ¿ªÇÒ A Role of Anorectal Physiologic Study for the Diagnosis of Chronic Constipation

´ëÇÑ´ëÀåÇ×¹®ÇÐȸÁö 2000³â 16±Ç 4È£ p.231 ~ 238
±è½ÂÇÑ, Ȳ¿ëÈñ, ÃÖ°ÇÇÊ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
±è½ÂÇÑ ( Kim Seung-Han ) 
¼­¿ïÀ§»ýº´¿ø ÀϹݿܰú

Ȳ¿ëÈñ ( Hwang-Young-Hee ) 
¼­¿ïÀ§»ýº´¿ø ÀϹݿܰú
ÃÖ°ÇÇÊ ( Choi Gun-Phil ) 
¼­¿ïÀ§»ýº´¿ø ÀϹݿܰú

Abstract


Purpose: To assess the role of anorectal physiologic study for the diagnosis of chronic idiopathic constipation.

Methods: A retrospective study of 81 constipated patients (23 male, 58 female) of mean age 48 16.6 (16¡­83) years who had no abnormalities in colonoscopy, barium enema, and rectal exam was done. 81 patients underwent defecography and cine-defecography, of which 66 patients underwent anal manometry, 52 patients underwent colonic transit time study (CTT), and 27 patients underwent anal plug electromyography (EMG).

Results: Nonrelaxing puborectalis syndrome (NRPR), rectocele, rectal intussusception, anal dyschezia, and sigmoidocele were observed in 27 (33.3%), 26 (32.1%), 14 (17.3%), 3 (3.7%), and 2 (2.5%) of the patients, respectively. Normal cinedefecography finding was observed in 21 (25.9%) patients. More than one abnormal finding was found in 11
(13.6%) patients. Abnormal findings included colonic inertia in 6 (11.5%) patients and pelvic outlet obstruction in 2 (3.8%) patients. Normal colon transit time was observed in 44 (84.6%) patients. Anal hypertonia was observed in 23 (34.8%) patients by anal monometry, of which 3 patients were diagnosed with anal dyschezia in cinedefecography. 13 (48.1%) patients were diagnosed with NRPR in anal plug EMG. The correlation rate between cinedefecography/EMG, defecography/CTT, and CTT/EMG were 81.5%, 61.5%, and 51.9% respectively in the diagnosis of NRPR. Sensitivities of the three tests were 72.7% for cinedefecography, 66.7% for EMG, and 7.7% for CTT in diagnosing NRPR (p£¼0.05). Positive predictive values of the three tests were 80% for anal plug EMG, 72.7% for cinedefecography, and 50% for CTT in the diagnosis of NRPR.

Conclusion: Defecography and EMG were complements each of the other in diagnosis of pelvic outlet obstruction especially NRPR, but CTT has no role.

Å°¿öµå

º¯ºñ; ¹èº¯Á¶¿µ¼ú;´ëÀåÅë°ú½Ã°£ ÃøÁ¤¼ú;±ÙÀüµµ °Ë»ç;Ä¡°ñÁ÷Àå±Ù À̿ϺÎÀüÁõ
Constipation;Defecography;Colon transit time;Electromyography;Non-relaxing puborectalis syndrome

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed
KAMS