¿øÀ§ºÎ Á÷Àå¾ÏÀÇ °ý¾à±Ù º¸Á¸ ¼ú½Ä: ÃÊÀúÀ§Àü¹æÀýÁ¦¼ú ¹× ´ëÀåÇ×¹® ¼ö±â ¹®ÇÕ¼úÀÇ Ä¡·á °æÇè
Sphincter Preserving Method for Distal Rectal Cancer: Treatment Experience of Ultra- low Anterior Resection and Hand Sewn Coloanal Anastomosis
¹é½ÂÇõ, ±è³²±Ô, ÀÌ°¿µ, ¼Õ½Â±¹, Á¶Àåȯ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
¹é½ÂÇõ ( Paik Seung-Hyuk )
¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
±è³²±Ô ( Kim Nam-Kyu )
¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
ÀÌ°¿µ ( Rhee Kang-Young )
¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
¼Õ½Â±¹ ( Sohn Seung-Kook )
¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
Á¶Àåȯ ( Cho Jang-Hwan )
¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
KMID : 0356720040200060358
Abstract
Purpose: As the oncologic safety of coloanal anastomosis (CAA) has been proven by many other authors, the incidence of CAA following a ultra-low anterior resection has increased. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the functional outcomes and complications for patients who underwent an ultra-low anterior resection and CAA for distal rectal cancer.
Methods: 57 patients underwent CAA following an ultra-low anterior resection between July 1997 and November 2003. 44 patients, who were followed up for more than 6 month after diverting ileostomy repair were evaluated for recurrence pattern, complications, and functional outcomes.
Results: The median follow-up period was 32.0¡¾22.8 (8¢¦83) months. The mean age of the patients was 54.3¡¾10.4 (23¢¦74) years. The types of anastomosis were straight CAA (n=20) and J pouch CAA (n=37). The mean tumor size was 4.1¡¾1.9 (2¢¦8) cm, the mean distal resection margin was 1.3¡¾0.9 (0.2¢¦4) cm. Six months later, the anastomosis distance following diverting ileostomy repair was measured at 3.24¡¾0.6 (2¢¦4) cm from the anal verge. The complications were multiple fistulas (n=3), fistula with anal stenosis (n=1), local recurrence with anal stenosis (n=1), anal stenosis (n=7). Anal incontinence (Kirwan grade III) was noted in 14 patients, and bowel movements more than 6 times per day were observed in 16 patients. Overall recurrence occurred in 6 patients (13.6%). The 5-years survival rate was 84.4%, and the 5-year disease-free survival was 68.9%.
Conclusions: Although CAA in patients with rectal cancer provides excellent long-term survival, a low risk of recurrence, in tolerable function, complications, and poor functional outcomes have been observed with CAA; therefore, the choice of this method should be considered carefully. J Korean Soc Coloproctol 2004;20:358-363
Å°¿öµå
Á÷Àå¾Ï;´ëÀå Ç×¹® ¹®ÇÕ¼ú;ÃÊÀúÀ§ Àü¹æ ÀýÁ¦¼ú
Rectal cancer;Coloanal anastomosis;Ultralow anterior resection
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸