Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

°áÀåÇ×¹®¹®ÇÕ¼úÀ» ÅëÇÑ °ý¾à±Ù º¸Á¸ ¼ú½Ä: Àå±â »ýÁ¸À²À» ¹ÙÅÁÀ¸·Î Sphincter Preserving Operation by Coloanal Anastomosis: Long Term Survival

´ëÇÑ´ëÀåÇ×¹®ÇÐȸÁö 2006³â 22±Ç 3È£ p.177 ~ 183
À̼±ÀÏ, ¹ÚÀ±¾Æ, ¼Õ½Â±¹,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
À̼±ÀÏ ( Lee Sun-Il ) 
¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç

¹ÚÀ±¾Æ ( Park Yoon-Ah ) 
¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
¼Õ½Â±¹ ( Sohn Seung-Kook ) 
¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract


Purpose: Abdominoperineal resection (APR) was the conventional operation for the last 100 years, however it decreased recently for the improvement of sphincter preserving operations, especially of hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis (CAA). The aim of this study is to evaluate oncological results for the CAA.

Methods: From January 1992 to August 2000, 107 consecutive patients with rectal cancer within 7 cm from anal verge who underwent a curative resection were evaluated retrospectively by operations (APR, CAA, and stapled low anterior resection, LAR). No temporary stoma was made for CAA and LAR.

Results: The mean age is 57.4 and the distance from the anal verge was 4.12 cm (¡¾1.55) for 65 males and 4.13 cm (¡¾1.67) for 42 females (p£¾0.05). The age, gender, tumor location, size, resection margin, and stage were not statistically significant according to the operations. The CAA increased from 8% (early) to 64% (late), and the APR decreased from 59% (early) to 16% (late). The 5 year survival rate was 70.1% (84.3% for Dukes B and 40.8% for Dukes C). Survivals were not statistically significant according to the type of operation. The local recurrence rate was 7.4% (13.8% for stapled low anterior resection, 7.0% for APR, and 2.8% for CAA). Of the patients with a CAA, 54% had received preoperative radiation therapy (45¡­55 Gy). In the late period, tumors located within 5 cm from the anal verge with fat or perirectal lymph nodes involved received preoperative radiation, and the sphincter-preserving rate was 80%.

Conclusions: CAA is an effective technique, with a safe oncologic result, for sphincter preservation in very low rectal cancer. J Korean Soc Coloproctol 2006;22:177-183

Å°¿öµå

°áÀåÇ×¹® ¹®ÇÕ¼ú;ÇϺΠÁ÷Àå¾Ï
Coloanal anastomosis;Low rectal cancer

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed
KAMS