Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Á÷Àå¾Ï ¼ö¼ú ÈÄ ¹®ÇպΠ´©ÃâÀÇ À§ÇèÀÎÀÚ¿Í ¿¹ÈÄ¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ Risk Factors and Oncologic Impact of Anastomotic Leakage after Rectal Cancer Surgery

´ëÇÑ´ëÀåÇ×¹®ÇÐȸÁö 2006³â 22±Ç 6È£ p.371 ~ 379
Á¤»óÈÆ, À¯Ã¢½Ä, ÃÖÆòÈ­, ±è´ëµ¿, È«µ¿Çö, ±èÈñö, ±èÁøõ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
Á¤»óÈÆ ( Jung Sang-Hun ) 
¿ï»ê´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç

À¯Ã¢½Ä ( Yu Chang-Sik ) 
¿ï»ê´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
ÃÖÆòÈ­ ( Choi Pyong-Wha ) 
¿ï»ê´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
±è´ëµ¿ ( Kim Dae-Dong ) 
¿ï»ê´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
È«µ¿Çö ( Hong Dong-Hyun ) 
¿ï»ê´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
±èÈñö ( Kim Hee-Cheol ) 
¿ï»ê´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
±èÁøõ ( Kim Jin-Cheon ) 
¿ï»ê´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract


Purpose: Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a serious and life- threatening complication following rectal cancer surgery. The impact on long-term oncologic outcome in patients with AL is not clear. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the risk factors of AL and its impact on long-term prognosis after rectal cancer surgery.

Methods: We investigated 1,391 patients who underwent primary resection and anastomosis for rectal cancer between January 1997 and August 2003. Operations were performed as follows: AR (n=164), LAR (n=898), uLAR (n=329). Standard procedures in our clinic were mesorectal excision according to tumor location and autonomic nerve preservation. Median follow-up period was 40.1 months (2¡­96 months).

Results: AL rate was 2.5% (n=35). Gender (male), age (£¾60 years) and uLAR were independent risk factors in multivariate analysis (HR: 3.03, 95% CI: 1.18¡­7.22; HR: 2.42, 95% CI: 1.12¡­7.83; HR: 2.68, 95% CI: 1.08¡­7.09, respectively). Local recurrence in the AL group was significantly higher than that in the non-AL group (P£¼0.05), but there was no significant difference in multivariate analysis (P=0.14). Systemic recurrence between both groups was not statistically different. The 5-year overall survival rate was significantly lower in the AL group than in the non-AL group (55.1% vs 74.1%, P£¼0.05) and the cancer- specific survival rate was lower in the AL group than in the non-AL group (63.0% vs 78.3%, P=0.05).

Conclusion: Age, gender, and anastomotic level were risk factors for AL after rectal cancer surgery and anastomotic leakage was associated with a poor survival. J Korean Soc Coloproctol 2006;22:371-379

Å°¿öµå

¹®ÇպΠ´©Ãâ;Á÷Àå¾Ï ¼ö¼ú;À§ÇèÀÎÀÚ;»ýÁ¸À²
Anastomotic leakage;Rectal cancer surgery;Risk factor;Survival rate

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed
KAMS