Á÷Àå¾ÏÀÇ º¹°°æÁ÷ÀåÀýÁ¦¼ú ÈÄ ¹ß»ýµÇ´Â ¹®Çպδ©ÃâÀÇ À§Çè¿ä¼Ò: º¹°°æÁ÷ÀåÀýÁ¦¼úÀº ¹®Çպδ©ÃâÀ» ³ôÀ̴°¡?
Risk Factors for Anastomotic Leakage after Laparoscopic Rectal Resection in Rectal Cancer: Does Laparoscopic Rectal Resection Increase Anastomotic Leakage Rate?
ÀÌÈ£¼®, ±è¹Î±Ç, ¹Úâ±Õ, Á¶À¯Áø, Ȳ´ö¿ø, ³ë»óÀÍ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
ÀÌÈ£¼® ( Lee Ho-Suk )
¼¿ïº¸Èƺ´¿ø ¿Ü°ú
±è¹Î±Ç ( Kim Min-Ghwon )
¼¿ïº¸Èƺ´¿ø ¿Ü°ú
¹Úâ±Õ ( Park Chang-Kyun )
¼¿ïº¸Èƺ´¿ø ¿Ü°ú
Á¶À¯Áø ( Cho Yoo-Jin )
¼¿ïº¸Èƺ´¿ø ¿Ü°ú
Ȳ´ö¿ø ( Hwang Duk-Won )
¼¿ïº¸Èƺ´¿ø ¿Ü°ú
³ë»óÀÍ ( Noh Sang-Ik )
¼¿ïº¸Èƺ´¿ø ¿Ü°ú
KMID : 0356720070230020101
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the risk factors for clinical anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer.
Methods: From March 2001 and February 2006 in Seoul Veterans¡¯ Hospital, the prospective laparoscopic colorectal resection database identified 101 patients who a had laparoscopic rectal resection with colorectal or coloanal anastomosis. The associations between clinical anastomotic leakage and patient-, tumor-, surgery- and laparoscopic-related variables were studied.
Results: The rate of clinical anastomotic leakage was 4 percent (4 of 101). The patient-related variable significantly associated with clinical anastomotic leakage was preoperative radiotherapy. The surgery-related factor that turned out to be significant was anastomosis situated less than 5 cm from the anal verge. No tumor- or laparoscopic-related variables were significantly associated with clinical anastomotic leakage.
Conclusion: A protective ileostomy should be considered after a laparoscopic rectal resection for an rectal cancer for anastomosis situated less than 5 cm from the anal verge, particularly when preoperative radiotherapy is being used. J Korean Soc Coloproctol 2007;23:101-109
Å°¿öµå
º¹°°æÁ÷ÀåÀýÁ¦¼ú;¹®Çպδ©Ãâ
Laparoscopic rectal resection;Anastomotic leakage
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸