Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

°áÁ÷Àå¾Ï °£ÀüÀÌ Áø´Ü ½Ã Ç÷û ¾Ï¹è¾ÆÇ׿øÀÇ ÀÓ»óÀû ÀÇÀÇ Clinical Significance of Serum Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA) Level at Diagnosis of Liver Metastases in Patients with Colorectal Cancer

´ëÇÑ´ëÀåÇ×¹®ÇÐȸÁö 2008³â 24±Ç 6È£ p.439 ~ 446
³²Á¤¼ö, ½ÅÁø¿ë, ±è°æÇÏ, ¹ÚÁ¤ÀÍ, ±è¿î¿ø, ÃÖâ¼ö, ÃÖ¿µ±æ, È«°üÈñ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
³²Á¤¼ö ( Nam Jeong-Su ) 
ÀÎÁ¦´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç

½ÅÁø¿ë ( Shin Jin-Yong ) 
ÀÎÁ¦´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ºÎ»ê¹éº´¿ø ¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
±è°æÇÏ ( Kim Kyung-Ha ) 
ÀÎÁ¦´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ºÎ»ê¹éº´¿ø ¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
¹ÚÁ¤ÀÍ ( Park Jeong-Ik ) 
ÀÎÁ¦´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ºÎ»ê¹éº´¿ø ¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
±è¿î¿ø ( Kim Woon-Won ) 
ÀÎÁ¦´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ºÎ»ê¹éº´¿ø ¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
ÃÖâ¼ö ( Choi Chang-Soo ) 
ÀÎÁ¦´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ºÎ»ê¹éº´¿ø ¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
ÃÖ¿µ±æ ( Choi Young-Kil ) 
ÀÎÁ¦´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ºÎ»ê¹éº´¿ø ¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
È«°üÈñ ( Hong Kwan-Hee ) 
ÀÎÁ¦´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ºÎ»ê¹éº´¿ø ¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract


Purpose: In numerous clinical trials to stratify prognosis of patients with liver metastases (LM) from colorectal cancer (CRC), the clinical value of serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels at diagnosis of LM has not been fully investigated in these group. The aim of this study is to explore the relation of CEA to characteristics of LM and to analyze prognostic value of this widely used tool.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed clinical data of 143 LM patients who were performed surgical intervention or non-surgical intervention. The cohort was divided into two groups; normal CEA group (NCEAG, £¼5ng/ml, n=41) and elevated CEA group (ECEAG, ¡Ã5 ng/ml, n=102). We examined correlation between serum CEA at diagnosis of LM and other clinicopathologic factors and performed univariate and multivariate analyses to determine the clinical impact of this marker on survival.

Results: Compared to ECEAG, the characteristics of LM of NCEAG was associated with unilobar distribution of LM (P=0.003), less metastases (P£¼0.001), less rate of synchronocity (P=0.008) and more surgical intervention of hepatic deposits (P£¼0.001). The 5-year survival rate for NCEAG was better than ECEAG (P=0.031). Multivariate analysis revealed that the presence of lymphatic duct invasion, no performance of chemotherapy, bilobar distribution of LM, and treatment of non-surgical intervention had a significant effect on survival. CEA elevation was identified as independently associated with bilobar distribution and non-surgical intervention of LM.

Conclusions: Although CEA level is not a independent prognostic factor in this study, the clinical characteristics identified in this study and correlation to non surgical intervention of LM may help better patient selection in the management of CRC LM patients.

Å°¿öµå

°£ÀüÀÌ;¾Ï¹è¾ÆÇ׿ø;¿¹ÈÄ
Liver metastasis;Carcinoembryonic antigen;Prognosis

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed
KAMS