The Role of Diverting Stoma After an Ultra-low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer
서석인, 유창식, Kim Gwon-Sik, 이종렬, 윤용식, 김찬욱, 임석병, 김진천,
소속 상세정보
서석인 ( Seo Seok-In )
University of Ulsan College of Medicine Asan Medical Center Department of Colon & Rectal Surgery
유창식 ( Yu Chang-Sik )
University of Ulsan College of Medicine Asan Medical Center Department of Colon & Rectal Surgery
( Kim Gwon-Sik )
University of Ulsan College of Medicine Asan Medical Center Department of Colon & Rectal Surgery
이종렬 ( Lee Jong-Lyul )
University of Ulsan College of Medicine Asan Medical Center Department of Colon & Rectal Surgery
윤용식 ( Yoon Yong-Sik )
University of Ulsan College of Medicine Asan Medical Center Department of Colon & Rectal Surgery
김찬욱 ( Kim Chan-Wook )
University of Ulsan College of Medicine Asan Medical Center Department of Colon & Rectal Surgery
임석병 ( Lim Seok-Byung )
University of Ulsan College of Medicine Asan Medical Center Department of Colon & Rectal Surgery
김진천 ( Kim Jin-Cheon )
University of Ulsan College of Medicine Asan Medical Center Department of Colon & Rectal Surgery
KMID : 0356720130290020066
Abstract
Purpose: A diverting stoma is known to reduce the consequences of distal anastomotic failure following colorectal surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a diverting stoma after an ultra-low anterior resection (uLAR) for rectal cancer.
Methods: Between 2000 and 2007, 836 patients who underwent an uLAR were divided into two groups, depending on the fecal diversion: 246 received fecal diversion, and 590 had no diversion. Patient- and disease-related variables were compared between the two groups.
Results: Thirty-two of the 836 patients (3.8%) had immediate anastomosis-related complications and required reoperation. Anastomosis leakage comprised 72% of the complications (23/32). The overall immediate complication rate was significantly lower in patients with a diverting stoma (0.8%, 2/246) compared to those without a diverting stoma (5.1%, 30/590; P = 0.005). The fecal diversion group had lower tumor location, lower anastomosis level, and more preoperative chemo-radiation therapy (P < 0.001). In total, 12% of patients in the diverting stoma group had complications either in making or reversing the stoma (30/246).
Conclusion: The diverting stoma decreased the rate of immediate anastomosis-related complications. However, the rate of complications associated with the diverting stoma was non-negligible, so strict criteria should be applied when deciding whether to use a diverting stoma.
키워드
Rectal neoplasms;Ileostomy;Colorectal surgery
원문 및 링크아웃 정보
등재저널 정보