Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¿ª°£Á¢ ÀûÇ÷±¸ ÀÀÁý¹ÝÀÀ¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ Ç÷û HBsAg¿Í °£Á¢ ÀûÇ÷±¸ ÀÀÁý¹ÝÀÀ¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ Ç÷û anti-HBsAgÀÇ °ËÃâ Detection of Serum HBsAg by Reserved Passive Hemoagglutination and Serum Anti-HBsAg by Passive Hemoagglutination

´ëÇѺ´¸®ÇÐȸÁö 1979³â 13±Ç 1È£ p.29 ~ 38
ÀÌÀº¿±, ¹Úº¹Èñ, ¿Õ¼ö°Ç,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
ÀÌÀº¿± (  ) 
ºÎ»ê´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ÀÓ»óº´¸®Çб³½Ç

¹Úº¹Èñ (  ) 
ºÎ»ê´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ÀÓ»óº´¸®Çб³½Ç
¿Õ¼ö°Ç (  ) 
ºÎ»ê´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ÀÓ»óº´¸®Çб³½Ç

Abstract


The authors investigated serum HBsAg and anti-HBsAg by methods of
counterimmunoelectrophoresis(CIEP) and reverses passive hemagglutination(r-PHA) and
passive hemagglutination(PHA)
The sera were obtained from 1502 cases of healthy control, 530 cases of acute liver
damage and 480 cases of chronic liver damage in Busan National University Hospital
during the year of 1977. We compared serum HBsAg and anti-HBsAg positive rates
between two methods and the following results were obtained.
1. In the healthy control, acute and chronic liver damage, serum HBsAg positive rates
4.5, 17.1 and 22.9% by R-PHA were significantly higher than those 2.3, 5.3 and 9.2% by
CIEP, respectively.
2. In the healthy control, acute and chronic liver damage, serum anti-HBsAg positive
rates 13.8, 14.9 and 17.5% by PHA were significantly higher than those 0.3, 0.4 and
1.5% by CIEP, respectively.
On the basis of above mentioned results, R-PHA and PHA tests proved to be more
sensitive than CIEP in detection of serum HBsAg and anti-HBsAg.

Å°¿öµå

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed
KAMS