Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Ç÷û Triglyceride ÃøÁ¤¿¡ °üÇÑ¿¬±¸ -È¿¼Ò¹ý°ú Acetylacetone ¹ý°úÀÇ ºñ±³- A Study on Determination of Triglyceride. -Comparision of enzymatic and acetylacetone method-

´ëÇѺ´¸®ÇÐȸÁö 1979³â 13±Ç 3È£ p.199 ~ 202
±è»óÈ£, Á¶ÇÑÀÇ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
±è»óÈ£ (  ) 
Ãæ³²´ëÇб³

Á¶ÇÑÀÇ (  ) 
¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ÀÓ»óº´¸®°ú

Abstract


A comparision of analytical methods for the determination of serum triglyceride was
made between enzymatic and acetylacetone methods.
The authors evaluated intra- and inter-assay variation as well as correlation between
two methods.
The results are as follows.
1. The mean values of triglyceride of one commercial control serum (Monitrol I) were
98. 02mg/dl by enzymatic method and 68.54mg/dl by acetylacetone method: enzymatic
method shown higher value compared to acetylacetone method by 30mg/dl.
2. Intra and inter-assay variation (n=12) represented by coefficient of variation was 3.1%
and 5.05% by enzymatic method, and 7.7% and 15.86% by acetylacetone method;
enzymatic method shorts lower inter-and inter assay variation.
3. A correlation between two methods (n=30) was made: correlation coefficient r=0.982,
and linear regression y= 1.22x+9.32
4. Enzymatic method has the advantage of simplicity, rapidity and specificity.

Å°¿öµå

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed
KAMS