Ç÷û Triglyceride ÃøÁ¤¿¡ °üÇÑ¿¬±¸ -È¿¼Ò¹ý°ú Acetylacetone ¹ý°úÀÇ ºñ±³-
A Study on Determination of Triglyceride. -Comparision of enzymatic and acetylacetone method-
±è»óÈ£, Á¶ÇÑÀÇ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
±è»óÈ£ ( )
Ãæ³²´ëÇб³
Á¶ÇÑÀÇ ( )
¼¿ï´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ÀÓ»óº´¸®°ú
KMID : 0357919790130030199
Abstract
A comparision of analytical methods for the determination of serum triglyceride was
made between enzymatic and acetylacetone methods.
The authors evaluated intra- and inter-assay variation as well as correlation between
two methods.
The results are as follows.
1. The mean values of triglyceride of one commercial control serum (Monitrol I) were
98. 02mg/dl by enzymatic method and 68.54mg/dl by acetylacetone method: enzymatic
method shown higher value compared to acetylacetone method by 30mg/dl.
2. Intra and inter-assay variation (n=12) represented by coefficient of variation was 3.1%
and 5.05% by enzymatic method, and 7.7% and 15.86% by acetylacetone method;
enzymatic method shorts lower inter-and inter assay variation.
3. A correlation between two methods (n=30) was made: correlation coefficient r=0.982,
and linear regression y= 1.22x+9.32
4. Enzymatic method has the advantage of simplicity, rapidity and specificity.
Å°¿öµå
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸