Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ºÎºÐÆ÷»ó±âÅ (Partial Hydatidiform Mole)ÀÇ º´¸®ÇÐÀû ¿¬±¸ Histopathological Study of Partial Hydatichiform Mole

´ëÇѺ´¸®ÇÐȸÁö 1984³â 18±Ç 1È£ p.40 ~ 46
ÀåÈñ°æ, ÀÌÅÂ, Á¤±Ô¼·,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
ÀåÈñ°æ (  ) 
ºÎ»ê´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ º´¸®Çб³½Ç

ÀÌÅ (  ) 
ºÎ»ê´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ º´¸®Çб³½Ç
Á¤±Ô¼· (  ) 
ºÎ»ê´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ º´¸®Çб³½Ç

Abstract

¿ä ¾à
ÀúÀÚ´Â ¿ÏÀü Æ÷»ó±âÅÂ¿Í °¨º°ÇÏ´ÂÅ× À¯ÀÇÇÑ ºÎºÐ Æ÷»ó±âÅÂÀÇ Æ¯Â¡ÀûÀÎ ÀÓ»óÀû ¹× º´¸®Á¶
Á÷ÇÐÀû ¼Ò°ßµéÀ» Á¶»çÇϱâ À§ÇÏ¿© ÀÌ ¿¬±¸¸¦ ½Ç½ÃÇÏ¿´´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸¿¡ ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ÀÏÂû Àç·á´Â
1970³â 1¿ùºÎÅÍ 19³â 12¿ù¸»±îÁö ¸¸ 11³â°£ º» ´ëÇÐ º´¸®Çб³½Ç¿¡¼­ Áø´ÜµÇ¾î Ç¥º»Àå¿¡ ¼Ò
ÀåµÇ¾î ÀÖ´ø ºÎºÐ Æ÷»ó±âÅ 54¿¹¿Í ¿ÏÀü Æ÷»ó±âÅ 212¿¹¿´´Ù. ÀÌ Ç¥º»µé¿¡ ȯÇÑ ÀÓ»óÀû ¹×
º´¸®Á¶Á÷ÇмҰߵéÀÇ ÃâÇö ºóµµ¸¦ Åë°èÀûÀ¸·Î °ËÅäÇÏ°í, ±× °á°ú¸¦ ´ÙÀ½°ú °°ÀÌ ¿ä¾àÇÑ´Ù.
1) ºÎºÐ ¹× ¿ÏÀü Æ÷»ó±âÅ´ 20´ë¿¡¼­ 50´ë »çÀÌ¿¡ ¹ß»ýµÇ¾ú°í, ¾çÇü °øÈ÷ 20´ë¿¡ ºó¹ßÇÏ
¿© ¿¬·É ºÐÆ÷¿¡ À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷°¡ ÀÎÁ¤µÇÁö ¾Æ´ÏÇÏ¿´´Ù.
2) ºÎºÐ Æ÷»ó±âÅ¿¡ À־ °æ»êºÎ°¡ 90%, ÃÊ»êºÎ°¡ 10%¿´°í, À¯»ê°æ·ÂÀÌ ÀÖ´Â Áõ·Ê°¡
¾à 32%¿´À¸¸ç, ¿ÏÀü Æ÷»ó±âÅ¿¡ À־ °æ»êºÎ°¡ 78%, ÃÊ»êºÎ°¡ 22% ¿´À¸¸ç, À¯»ê°æ·ÂÀ»
°¡Áø Áõ·Ê°¡ ¾à 36%·Î¼­, ¾çÇü »çÀÌ¿¡ ÀӽŠ¹× À¯»ê·Âº° ºóµµ¿¡ À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷°¡ ¾ø¾ú´Ù.
3) ¿ÏÀü Æ÷»ó±âÅ¿¡¼­ °üÂûµÈ º´¸®Á¶Á÷ÇÐÀû ¼Ò°ßµéÀº °£ÁúÀÇ ¼öÁ¾¼º º¯¼º°ú Á߽ɼº ¼öÁ¶
°¡ °¢°¢ 100%, ¹Ì·Î¾ç ¼öÁ¶°¡ 4.9%, ÀûÇ÷±¸¸¦ ³»Æ÷ÇÏ´Â ¸ð¼¼°üÀÌ 0.9%, ±×¸®°í ¸Æ³«¸·ÀÇ ¶Ñ
·ÇÇÑ Áõ½ÄÀÌ 65.6%¿´´Ù.
4) ºÎºÐ Æ÷»ó±âÅ¿¡¼­ °üÂûµÈ º´¸®Á¶Á÷ÇÐÀû ¼Ò°ßµéÀº ÅÂ¹Ý À¶¸ðÀÇ È¥Àç¿Í °£ÁúÀÇ ¼öÁ¾¼º
º¯¼ºÀÌ °¢ÀÚ 100%, Á߽ɼº ¼öÁ¶°¡ 90.4%, ¹Ì·Î¾ç ¼öÁ¶°¡ 83.3%, À¯ÇÙÀûÇ÷±¸¸¦ ³»Æ÷ÇÏ´Â Ç÷
°üÀÌ 98.1%, ±×¸®°í ¸Æ³«¸· »óÇÇÀÇ ¶Ñ·ÇÇÑ Áõ½ÄÀÌ 22.2%¿´´Ù.
µû¶ó¼­, ¿ÏÀüÇü°ú °¨º°Çϴµ¥ À¯ÀÇÇÑ ºÎºÐ Æ÷»ó±âÅÂÀÇ ¼Ò°ßµéÀº º´¸®Á¶Á÷ÇÐÀû ¼Ò°ß»ÓÀ̾ú
°í, ±×°ÍµéÀº ±âżº À¶¸ð °£ÁúÀÇ ¹Ì·Î¾ç ¼öÁ¶, ÅÂ¹Ý À¶¸ðÀÇ È¥Àç, ±×¸®°í À¯ÇÙ ÀûÇ÷±¸¸¦ ³»
Æ÷ÇÏ´Â Ç÷°üµéÀ̶ó°í ÀÎÁ¤µÇ¾ú´Ù.
#ÃÊ·Ï#
The study was undertaken to investigate the clinical and histopathological
characteristics of partial hydatidiform mole. The subjects were a series of consecutive 54
cases of partial hydatidiform mole and 212 cases of classic hydatidiform mole, which
were diagnosed pathologically at the department of pathology during the 11 years period
from 1970 to 1980. The cases were analyzed morphologically and statistically.
The results obtained were summarized as follows :
1) The age distributions of the patients with partial and classic moles were from third
to sixth decade with a peak incidence of third decade. There was no significant
difference in the age distribution between partial and classic moles.
2) In the patients with partial mole, 90% of the cases were multipara and 32% of
cases had history of spontaneous or artificial abortion. In the patients with classic mole,
78% of crises were multipara and 36% of cases had history of abortion. There was no
significant difference in obstetric history of the both types.
3) Histopathologic findings of the classic mole- were hydropic change and central
cisterns of the stroma (100%), maze-like cisterns of the stroma(4.3%), blood vessels
with/without red cells (0.9%), and considerable hyperplasia of trophoblasts(65.6%).
4) Histopathologic findings of the partial mole consisted of hydropic villi admixed with
normal villi (100%), hydropic change of the stroma (100%), central cisterns of the
stroma (90.4%), maine-like cisterns of the stroma (53.3%) , blood vessels with mature
and immature red cells (98.1%), and considerable typerplasia of trophoblasts (22.2%).
On the basis of the above results, characteristic findings of partial mole, which might
be distinguished from classic type, were maze-like cisterns of the stroma, mixture of
normal and hydropic villi, and blood vessels with mature or immature re4 cells in the
stroma.

Å°¿öµå

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

   

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed
KAMS