Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

À¯¹æ¾ÏÁ¾¿¡¼­ E2F4¿Í E2F2ÀÇ ¹ßÇö Expressions of E2F4 and E2F2 Transcription Factors in Breast Carcinoma

´ëÇѺ´¸®ÇÐȸÁö 2005³â 39±Ç 5È£ p.301 ~ 306
±èÀº¿µ, À̹ÌÀÚ, Á¶ÇöÁø,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
±èÀº¿µ ( Kim Eun-Young ) 
Á¶¼±´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾Æ°úÇб³½Ç

À̹ÌÀÚ ( Lee Mi-Ja ) 
Á¶¼±´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ º´¸®Çб³½Ç
Á¶ÇöÁø ( Jo Hyun-Jin ) 
Á¶¼±´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract


Background: The E2F family (E2F1 to E2F6) of transcription factors plays a key role in cell cycle progression. Some act as oncogenes and others act as tumor suppressor genes (TSG) in a tissue-specific manner. E2F4 may function as a TSG. However, the role of E2F4 in breast carcinogenesis remains controversial. Also the clinical impact of E2F2 expression on breast cancer remains unknown.

Methods: Expressions of E2F4 and E2F2 were assessed imunohistochemically in 113 breast carcinomas and were compared with clinicopathological variables, expressions of G1/S checkpoint proteins (p16, cyclin D1 and Rb), and DNA ploidy to identify their possible role and to assess their prognostic value in breast cancer.

Results: Expressions of E2F4 and E2F2 were detected in 48 cases (42.5%) and 66 cases (58.4%), respectively. Expressions of E2F4 and E2F2 were significantly correlated with large tumor size (p<0.001) and lymph node metastasis (p<0.001). There was no correlation between expressions of E2F4 or E2F2 and any other variables, including age, histologic grade, DNA ploidy and expressions of p16, cyclin D1 and Rb.

Conclusions: These results suggest that expressions of E2F4 and E2F2 are associated with growth and spread of breast cancer and indicate poor prognosis.

Å°¿öµå

cancer;E2F4 transcription factor;E2F2 transcription factor;Immunohistochemistry

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed
KAMS