Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¹æ±¤ÀÇ ¿ä·Î»óÇǼ¼Æ÷Á¾¾çÀÇ ISUP/WHOµî±Þ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¿¬±¸ ISUP/WHO Classification of Papillary Urothelial Neoplasms of Urinary Bladder- Consensus Study Conducted by Korean Society of Urogenital Pathology -

´ëÇѺ´¸®ÇÐȸÁö 2006³â 40±Ç 4È£ p.282 ~ 288
½ÉÁ¤¿ø, À̵¿È­, ³ëÀçÀ±, Á¶³²ÈÆ, ¹Ú¿ë¿í, ÇÑ¿î¼·, ±è¿µ½Ä, ÃÖ¿µÁø, ½É»óÀÎ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
½ÉÁ¤¿ø ( Shim Jung-Weon ) 
ÇѸ²´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ º´¸®Çб³½Ç

À̵¿È­ ( Lee Dong-Wha ) 
¼øõÇâ´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ º´¸®Çб³½Ç
³ëÀçÀ± ( Ro Jae-Y. ) 
The Methodist º´¿ø º´¸®°ú
Á¶³²ÈÆ ( Cho Nam-Hoon ) 
¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ º´¸®Çб³½Ç
¹Ú¿ë¿í ( Park Yong-Wook ) 
ÇѾç´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ º´¸®Çб³½Ç
ÇÑ¿î¼· ( Han Woon-Sup ) 
ÀÌÈ­¿©ÀÚ´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ º´¸®Çб³½Ç
±è¿µ½Ä ( Kim Young-Sik ) 
°í·Á´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ º´¸®Çб³½Ç
ÃÖ¿µÁø ( Choi Yeong-Jin ) 
°¡Å縯´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ º´¸®Çб³½Ç
½É»óÀΠ( Shim Sang-In ) 
°¡Å縯´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ º´¸®Çб³½Ç

Abstract


Background: Pathologic grading, one of the most important prognostic factors of papillary urothelial neoplasia (PUN) of the urinary bladder, has been revised continuously. The current study focused on the analysis of interobserver agreement on PUN of the urinary bladder bet- ween 1973 WHO classification (WHO 1973) and 1998 WHO/ISUP classification.

Methods: Seventy five cases from 15 institutions were collected, and after review by Korean Society of Urogenital Pathology (KSUP), 30 cases were selected as follows; group I, WHO grade 1 and papillary urothelial neoplasm of low malignant potential by ISUP (7 cases), group II, WHO grade 2 and low-grade papillary urothelial carcinoma (16 cases), and group III, WHO grade 3 and high-grade papillary urothelial carcinoma (7 cases). Seventy five general surgical pathologists who participated in this study were asked to grade the tumors based on WHO/ISUP classification. Interobserver agreement between the participants¡¯ diagnosis and KSUP consensus diagnosis was analyzed by kappa value.

Results: Interobserver agreement assessed by kappa value for all diagnostic groups was very low; for group I, kappa value was -0.900893722; for group II, -0.944650025, and for group III, -0.876728996. The overall kappa value of pathology residents was better than that of practicing pathologists.

Conclusions: The 1998 WHO/ ISUP classification could not be easily translated from the 1973 WHO classification and because of poor interobserver agreement, it appears that further work would be needed before it can be practically applied.

Å°¿öµå

Bladder neoplasms;WHO classification;Transitional cell carcinoma

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed
KAMS