Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Proposal for a Standardized Pathology Report of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Prognostic Significance of Pathological Parameters

´ëÇѺ´¸®ÇÐȸÁö 2013³â 47±Ç 3È£ p.227 ~ 237
Korean Society of Pathologists, Á¶¹Ì¿¬, ¼ÕÁøÈñ, Áø¼Ò¿µ, ±èÇö±â, Á¤Àº¼±, ±è¹ÌÁ¤, ±è°æ¹Ì, ±è¿ìÈ£, ±èÁعÌ, °­À±°æ, ÃÖÁØÇõ, °­´ë¿µ, ±èÀ±È­, ÃÖÀºÈñ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
 ( Korean Society of Pathologists ) 
¼Ò¼ÓÈ®ÀÎÁß

Á¶¹Ì¿¬ ( Cho Mee-Yon ) 
Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicirne Wonju Severance Christian Hospital Department of Pathology
¼ÕÁøÈñ ( Sohn Jin-Hee ) 
Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine Kangbuk Samsung Medical Center Department of Pathology
Áø¼Ò¿µ ( Jin So-Young ) 
Soonchunhyang University Hospital Department of Pathology
±èÇö±â ( Kim Hyun-Ki ) 
Yonsei University College of Medicine Severance Hospital Department of Pathology
Á¤Àº¼± ( Jung Eun-Sun ) 
Catholic University College of Medicine Seoul St. Mary¡¯s Hospital Department of Pathology
±è¹ÌÁ¤ ( Kim Mi-Jung ) 
University of Ulsan College of Medicine Asan Medical Center Department of Pathology
±è°æ¹Ì ( Kim Kyoung-Mee ) 
Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine Samsung Medical Center Department of Pathology
±è¿ìÈ£ ( Kim Woo-Ho ) 
Seoul National University Hospital Department of Pathology
±èÁع̠( Kim Joon-Mee ) 
Inha University Hospital Department of Pathology
°­À±°æ ( Kang Yun-Kyung ) 
Inje University Seoul Paik Hospital Department of Pathology
ÃÖÁØÇõ ( Choi Joon-Hyuk ) 
Yeungnam University Medical Center Department of Pathology
°­´ë¿µ ( Kang Dae-Young ) 
Chungnam National University Hospital Department of Pathology
±èÀ±È­ ( Kim Youn-Wha ) 
Kyung hee University Medical Center Department of Pathology
ÃÖÀºÈñ ( Choi Eun-Hee ) 
Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine

Abstract


Background: There is confusion in the diagnosis and biological behaviors of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs), because of independently proposed nomenclatures and classifications. A standardized form of pathology report is required for the proper management of patients. Methods: We discussed the proper pathological evaluation of GEP-NET at the consensus conference of the subcommittee meeting for the Gastrointestinal Pathology Study Group of the Korean Society of Pathologists. We then verified the prognostic significance of pathological parameters from our previous nationwide collection of pathological data from 28 hospitals in Korea to determine the essential data set for a pathology report. Results: Histological classification, grading (mitosis and/or Ki-67 labeling index), T staging (extent, size), lymph node metastasis, and lymphovascular and perineural invasion were significant prognostic factors and essential for the pathology report of GEP-NET, while immunostaining such as synaptophysin and chromogranin may be optional. Furthermore, the staging system, either that of the 2010 American Joint Cancer Committee (AJCC) or the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS), should be specified, especially for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms. Conclusions: A standardized pathology report is crucial for the proper management and prediction of prognosis of patients with GEPNET.

Å°¿öµå

Neuroendocrine tumors; Digestive system; Pathology; Staging; Grading; Prognosis

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed
KAMS