Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¿ä°ü°á¼®À¸·Î ÀÎÇÑ »óºÎ¿ä·Î °¨¿°¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼¼±ÕÇÐÀû °íÂû Bacteriologic Study of Upper Urinary Tract Infection with Ureteral Stone

´ëÇѺñ´¢±â°úÇÐȸÁö 1977³â 18±Ç 4È£ p.315 ~ 318
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
À̺´±Ç/Lee BK ¾Ó°Å¿µ/Yang KY

Abstract


In clinical practice, we have occasionally experienced the difficulty to identify the pathologic changes of the non or faint-visualized kidney induced by ureteral stone on I. V. P. and especially to decide whether upper urinary tract infection of ipsilateral side was in accordance with lower urinary tract infection or not. We have checked routinely the bacteriological study of the urine collected from the ureterolithotomized site on operation during last two years.
Following results were obtained:

1) Among the cultured urine of 42 patients, organism detected in 20 patients and no growth in remainder.

Colifrom bacilli 11(26.2%)

Staphylococci 5(11.9%)

Streptococci 1(2.4%)

Pseudomonas 1(2.4%)

TB bacilli 2(4.7%)

2) Sensitive drug pattern of 18 patients,

Coliform bacilli (11): Kanamycin, Streptomycin, Chloramphenicol

Staphylococcus (5): Penicillin, Kanamycin

Streptococcus (1): Penicillin

Pseudomonas (1): Geopen

From above results, some advantages has been provided in the post-operative management of upper urinary tract infection after removal of the ureteral stone.

Å°¿öµå

°á¼®; ¿ä°ü; ¿ä·Î°¨¿°; ureteral stone; urinary tract infection

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

   

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed
KAMS