Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¹è¼®±â Á¾·ù¿¡ µû¸¥ ÇϺδ¢°ü °á¼®ÀÇ ¹è¼®È¿°ú¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ºñ±³°üÂû A Comparative Observation on Success Rates of Stone Dislodgers

´ëÇѺñ´¢±â°úÇÐȸÁö 1985³â 26±Ç 6È£ p.673 ~ 676
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
°­¿µÅÂ/Kang YT ¿ìÅÂÇü/Woo TH

Abstract


A comparative observation was done on 139 patients of the lower ureteral stone, those were applied cystoscopic manipulation with 3 different types of stone dislodger at the Department of Urology, Seoul Adventist Hospital, during the periods from Jan. 1982 to June 1985.
During that periods, we applied end-loop catheter in 48 patients, blunt-tip Dormia basket in 38 patients.

The results were as follows;

1. The success rate of passage of dislodger beyond the stone was the highest in filiform-tip Dormia basket (97.4%) and loop catheter was the lowest (8l.3%).

2. The success rate of the primary stone extraction with filiform-tip Dormia basket was the highest (86.8%).

3. Indwelling of the dislodger in the ureter loop catheter was the most successful method among them(62.5%).

4. Of the cases of passage beyond the stone, the success rates of the stone extraction were very high and similar in their results, as in 92.3% with loop catheter, in 90.9% with blunt-tip Dormia basket, in 91.9% with filiform-tip Dormia basket.

5. The overall success rate of stone extraction was 75.0% in loop catheter, 75.5% in blunt-tip Dormia basket 89.5% in filiform-tip Dormia basket.

Å°¿öµå

°á¼®; ¹è¼®±â; µµ¹Ì¾Æ¹Ù½ºÄÏ; urolithiasis; stone dislodger; dormia basket

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

   

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed
KAMS