Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¹«¸¶Ãë ¿ä°ü°æÇÏ ¹è¼®¼ú Ureteroscopic Removal of Ureteral Calculi without Anesthesia

´ëÇѺñ´¢±â°úÇÐȸÁö 1997³â 38±Ç 7È£ p.707 ~ 712
±èÇöȸ, Á¶±Ô¼±, ±è¼ö¿õ, ±è¿í¼º,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
±èÇöȸ (  ) 
¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ºñ´¢±â°úÇб³½Ç

Á¶±Ô¼± (  ) 
¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ºñ´¢±â°úÇб³½Ç
±è¼ö¿õ (  ) 
¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ºñ´¢±â°úÇб³½Ç
±è¿í¼º (  ) 
¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ºñ´¢±â°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract

°á·Ð
1994³â 8¿ùºÎÅÍ 1996³â 8¿ù±îÁö ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³º´¿ø ºñ´¢±â°ú¿¡ ÀÔ¿ø ¶Ç´Â ¿Ü·¡¿¡¼­ ¹«¸¶ÃëÇÏ
¿¡ ¿ä°ü°æÇÏ ¹è¼®¼úÀ» ½ÃÇà¹ÞÀº ¿ä°ü¼® ȯÀÚ 62·Ê¸¦ ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ÇÏ¿©, ¿ä¼®ÀÇ Å¸Ä¡·á¹æ¹ý Ư
È÷ ¸¶ÃëÇÏ¿¡¼­ÀÇ ¿ä°ü°æÇÏ ¹è¼®¼ú°ú ¼º°øÀ² ¹× ÇÕº´Áõ µî¿¡ ´ëÇØ ºñ±³ÇÏ¿© º¸¾Ò´Ù.
1) ¿ä°ü¼® ȯÀÚ 62·Ê¿¡¼­ ½ÃÇàÇÑ ¹«¸¶Ãë ¿ä°ü°æÇÏ ¹è¼®¼úÀº ¼ö¼úÁ÷ÈÄ 87.1% (54·Ê)ÀÇ ¼º
°øÀ²À» º¸¿´À¸¸ç, ¼úÈÄ 2ÁÖ À̳»ÀÇ ÃßÀû °üÂû ÅëÇÑ ÃÖÁ¾ ¼º°øÀ²Àº 91.9% (57·Ê)À̾ú´Ù. ´ë»ó
ȯÀÚÀÇ ¼ºº°, ¿ä¼®ÀÇ À§Ä¡ ¹× Å©±â¿¡ µû¸¥ ¼º°øÀ²ÀÇ Åë°èÇÐÀûÀÎ À¯ÀǼºÀº °üÂûµÇÁö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù.
´Ù¸¸ ±â°£¿¡ µû¸¥ ¼º°øÀ²¿¡´Â Åë°èÀûÀ¸·Î ÀǹÌÀÖ´Â °á°ú¸¦ ¾ò¾ú´Ù.
2) ¸¶ÃëÇÏ¿¡¼­ÀÇ ¿ä°ü°æÇÏ ¹è¼®¼úÀÇ ÇÕº´Áõ(5.9¡­10.9%)°ú ºñ±³ÇÏ¿© ³ôÁö ¾ÊÀº ÇÕº´Áõ
(8.1%)À» ³ªÅ¸³Â´Ù.
3) 62·ÊÁß ¿Ü·¡ ¹× ÀÀ±Þ½ÇÀ» ÅëÇÑ ½Ã¼úÀº 7·ÊÀ̾ú°í, ÀÔ¿ø 55·Ê¿¡¼­ÀÇ Æò±ÕÀç¿øÀϼö´Â
3.83ÀÏ·Î ¼ú ÈÄ 1.83ÀÏ À̳»¿¡ ´ë°³ ÅðÀ©ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÀÌ»óÀÇ °á°ú¿¡¼­ ¹«¸¶Ãë ¿ä°ü°æÇÏ ¹è¼®¼úÀº
¼º°øÀ²ÀÌ ³ô°í ÇÕº´ÁõÀÌ ºñ±³Àû ³ôÁö ¾ÊÀº ¾ÈÀüÇÑ ¹æ¹ýÀ¸·Î, ÀÔ¿ø ¹× Ä¡·á±â°£À» ÁÙÀÏ ¼ö
ÀÖ°í, ¿Ü·¡¿¡¼­µµ ½ÃÇàÇÒ ¼öµµ ÀÖ´Ù´Â Á¡¿¡¼­ ¿ä°ü¼®ÀÇ ÀÏÂ÷ÀûÀÎ Ä¡·á¹æ¹ýÀ¸·Î °í·ÁµÇ¾î¾ß
ÇÒ °ÍÀÌ´Ù.
#ÃÊ·Ï#
Ureteroscopy has been used widely to remove urethral calculi, especially distal ureter
stones. In this study we tried to evaluate the exact role of ureteroscopic manipulation
for ureter stones in the era of ESWL.
We report our experience on performing ureteroscopic removal of ureteral calculi
without anesthesia. Between August 1994 and August 1996, ureteroscopy was performed
in 62 cases without anesthesia. We examined the feasibility of performing ureteroscopy
under sedation only. Age distribution was 17¡­71 years old (mean 49.3). Overall success
rate was 91.9% (57 cases among 62 cases). The success rates according to sex were
92.9% in male and 91.2% in female. The success rates according to location were 100%
in proximal ureter, 83.3% in middle ureter and 92.6% in distal ureter. The success rates
according to size were 92.7% in ¡Â10 mm and 85.7% in >10 mm stone patients. We
could not find any statistical meaning about the success rates according to sex, location
and size (p>0.05). In 7 cases the procedure were performed at outpatient department.
Mean duration of hospitalization (in 55 cases) was 3.83 days. The associated
complication rate was relatively low (8.1%), with most patients being treated
conservatively.
We conclude that ureteroscopy, when performed without general or regional
anesthesia, does not increase the risk of complications or compromise the results of
treatment. So we recommend ureteroscopy without anesthesia as a primary choice in the
manipulation of urethral calculi.

Å°¿öµå

Ureteral calculi; Ureteroscopy; Without anesthesia;

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

   

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed
KAMS