Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¿©¼º ±äÀ强 ¿ä½Ç±Ý ȯÀÚ¿¡¼­ Stress Leak-Point Pressure¿Í Maximal Urethral Closure PressureÀÇ ºñ±³ A Comparison of Stress Leak-Point Pressure and Maximal Urethral Closure Pressure in Patients with Genuine Stress Incontinence

´ëÇѺñ´¢±â°úÇÐȸÁö 1997³â 38±Ç 10È£ p.1084 ~ 1088
±è´ë¿ì, ¹Ú¼®»ê,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
±è´ë¿ì (  ) 
ÀÎÁ¦´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ »ó°è¹éº´¿ø

¹Ú¼®»ê (  ) 
ÀÎÁ¦´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ºñ´¢±â°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract

°á·Ð
¿©¼º ±äÀ强 ¿ä½Ç±Ý ȯÀÚ¿¡¼­ stress leak-point pressure¿Í maximal urethral closure
pressure´Â Åë°èÀûÀ¸·Î´Â À¯ÀÇÇÑ »ó°ü°ü°è°¡ ÀÖ¾úÀ¸³ª, ÀÓ»óÀûÀÎ ¿¬°ü¼ºÀº ¶³¾îÁ³À¸¸ç, type
¥² ±äÀ强 ¿ä½Ç±ÝÀÎ stress leak-point pressure 60 §¯H2O ÀÌÇϸ¦ ±âÁØÀ¸·Î
Çϸé maximal urethral closure pressure°¡ 20 §¯H2O ÀÌÇÏÀÎ low-pressure
urethraȯÀÚ¸¦ °ËÃâÇϴµ¥ À־ ¹Î°¨µµ¿Í ƯÀ̵µ´Â ³ô¾ÒÁö¸¸, ¾ç¼º ¿¹ÃøÀ²Àº ¸Å¿ì ³·¾Ò´Ù.
¶ÇÇÑ stress leak point pressure°¡ 60 §¯H2O ÀÌÇÏÀÎ 38¸íÀÇ type ¥² ±äÀ强
¿ä½Ç±Ý ȯÀÚ Áß¿¡¼­ maximal urethral closure pressure°¡ 20 §¯H2O ÀÌÇÏÀÎ
ȯÀÚ´Â 11¸í (28.9%) »ÓÀ̾úÀ¸¸ç, 27¸í (71.1%)Àº maximal urethral closure pressure°¡ 20
§¯H2O ÀÌ»óÀ̾ú´Ù.
ÀÌ»óÀÇ °á°ú·Î stress leak-point pressure°¡ 60 §¯H2O ÀÌÇÏÀÎ type ¥² ±ä
À强 ¿ä½Ç±Ý°ú maximal urethral closure pressure¿Í´Â ¿¬°ü¼ºÀÌ ¶³¾îÁö¸ç, type ¥² ±äÀ强
¿ä½Ç±ÝÀ» Áø´ÜÇϴµ¥ À־ maximal urethral closure pressureÀÇ ÃøÁ¤Àº µµ¿òÀÌ µÇÁö ¾Ê´Â
°ÍÀ¸·Î »ç·áµÈ´Ù.
#ÃÊ·Ï#
Purpose: To determine the correlation between the maximal urethral closure pressure
and the stress leak-point pressure in the patients with genuine stress incontinence, and
to define the benefit of maximal urethral closure pressure for detecting type ¥² stress
urinary incontinence.
Materials and methods: 115 patients with genuine stress incontinence were evaluated
with multichannel urodynamics. Maximal urethral closure pressures and stress leak-point
pressures were determined and correlated.
Results: There was a statistically significant relationship (p=0.0001) between the stress
leak-point pressure and the maximal urethral closure pressure. However, a correlation
coefficient of 0.50 demonstrated poor clinical relationship. A stress leak-point pressure
less than 60 §¯ H2O had 91.7% sensitivity, 78.8% specificity and 28.9%
positive predictive value in detecting low-pressure urethra.
Conclusions: The stress leak-point pressure has poor clinical correlation to the
maximal urethral closure pressure. And maximal urethral closure pressure has no
additional benefit for detecting type ¥² stress urinary incontinence.

Å°¿öµå

Stress leak-point pressure; Maximal urethral closure pressure; Stress incontinence;

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

   

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed
KAMS