Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

VATER ÁõÈıºÀÇ ºñ´¢±â°úÀû °íÂû Urologic Aspect in the Management of VATER Anomalies

´ëÇѺñ´¢±â°úÇÐȸÁö 1997³â 38±Ç 11È£ p.1202 ~ 1209
Á¤À±Çü, ÇÑ»ó¿ø, ÀÌÅÃ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
Á¤À±Çü (  ) 
¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ºñ´¢±â°úÇб³½Ç

ÇÑ»ó¿ø (  ) 
¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ºñ´¢±â°úÇб³½Ç
ÀÌÅà(  ) 
¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ºñ´¢±â°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract

°á·Ð
ÀúÀÚµéÀº 10¸íÀÇ VATERÁõÈıº ȯ¾Æ¸¦ ´ë»óÀ¸·Î µ¿¹Ý±âÇüÀÇ Á¾·ù, ºñ´¢»ý½Ä±â ±âÇü, Ä¡
·á°æ°ú, ÇÕº´Áõ, ¿¹ÈÄ, Ä¡·á½ÃÀÇ ¹®Á¦Á¡À» °íÂûÇÏ¿© ´ÙÀ½°ú °°Àº °á·ÐÀ» ¾ò¾ú´Ù.
1. Á¶±â»ç¸Á¿¡¼­ºÎÅÍ ±â´ÉÀû °áÇÔ¸¸À» º¸ÀÌ´Â Á¤µµ·Î ±âÇüÀÇ ½ÉÇÑ Á¤µµ¿Í ÀÓ»ó ¾ç»óÀÌ ´Ù
¾çÇÏ¸ç »óȲ¿¡ µû¸¥ ÀûÀýÇÏ°í ¸é¹ÐÇÑ °Ë»ç¿Í Ä¡·á°¡ ÇÊ¿äÇÏ´Ù.
2. ºñ´¢±â°è ±âÇüÀÇ µ¿¹ÝÀ²Àº ¸Å¿ì ³ôÀ¸¸ç Á¶±â¿¡ Á¤È®ÇÑ Áø´Ü ¹× Ä¡·á½Ã ºñ´¢±â°è ±âÇü
¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ È¯¾ÆÀÇ ÀÌȯ°ú »ç¸ÁÀ» ÁÙÀÏ ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù.
3. ¿ä·Î°¨¿°¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¿¹¹æ°ú Ä¡·á¸¦ À§ÇØ ºÐ¸®µÈ °áÀå Á¶·ç¼úÀÇ ½Ç½Ã°¡ ¹Ù¶÷Á÷Çϸç, ±âÁ¸ÀÇ
ȯ»ó ÇÏÇà°áÀå Á¶·ç¼úÀ» ½ÃÇàÇÒ °æ¿ì¿¡´Â ¿øÀ§ °áÀåÀ» °¡´ÉÇÑ ÇÑ Âª°Ô ¸¸µé°í ¿øÀ§°áÀåÀ»
±ÔÄ¢ÀûÀ¸·Î ¼¼Ã´ÇÏ¸ç ¿¹¹æÀû Ç×»ýÁ¦ÀÇ Åõ¿©°¡ ÇÊ¿äÇÏ´Ù. ºñ´¢»ý½Ä±â°èÀÇ ±âÇüÀÌ ÀÖÀ» ¶§¿¡
´Â ¿ì¼±ÀûÀ¸·Î ºñ´¢»ý½Ä±â°èÀÇ Ä¡·á°¡ ÀûÀÀµÈ´Ù.
4. ±â°ü½Äµµ·ç°¡ °¡Àå ¿¹ÈÄ°¡ ÁÁÁö ¾ÊÀº µ¿¹Ý±âÇüÀ¸·Î »ý°¢µÇ¾ú°í, ¿ä°ñ±âÇü, ôÃß±âÇüÀÌ
ÀÖÀ» ¶§ ȯ¾ÆÀÇ »ýÁ¸¿¡ ºÒ¸®ÇÑ ÀÎÀÚ·Î »ý°¢µÇ¾ú´Ù.
5. ½Å°æÀμº ¹æ±¤ÀÇ ¹ß»ý ºóµµ°¡ ³ôÀ¸¸ç, ÀÌÀÇ Áø´Ü ¹× ÀûÀýÇÑ Ä¡·á¸¦ À§Çؼ­, Ç×¹®±³Á¤¼ú
ÈÄ º¯½Ç±ÝÀÇ ¹ß»ý °¡´É¼ºÀ» ¿¹ÃøÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ°í, ÇϺΠ¿ä·ÎÀÇ ½Å°æºñ´¢±â°úÀû »óŸ¦ ÆľÇÇϸç
ÃßÀû Á¶»çÁß ¹æ±¤ÀÇ »óŸ¦ ´ëÁ¶ ÆľÇÇϱâ À§ÇÑ ±âº» °Ë»ç·Î¼­, ¿ä¿ªµ¿ÇÐ °Ë»ç°¡ ÇÊ¿äÇÏ´Ù.
6. ´ÙÀå±â ±âÇü¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Á¤È®ÇÑ °Ë»ç, °èȹµÈ ¼ö¼úÀû Ä¡·á¸¦ ½ÃÇàÇÒ °æ¿ì »ýÁ¸·üÀÌ ¸Å¿ì ³ô
°í ¸¸Á·½º·± ¼ºÀå°ú ¹ß´ÞÀ» ¾òÀ» ¼ö ÀÖÀ¸¹Ç·Î º¸È£ÀÚÀÇ ´Éµ¿ÀûÀÌ°í Àû±ØÀûÀÎ Ä¡·á ÀÇÁö¸¦
À¯µµÇÏ¿© ȯÀÇ ½ÅÀå±â´É º¸Á¸ ¹× »îÀÇ ÁúÀû Ç×»óÀ» µµ¸ðÇؾßÇÑ´Ù.
#ÃÊ·Ï#
Ten cases of VATER syndrome were reviewed to determine the type of anomalies,
genitourinary anomalies, complications of treatment and prognosis. None of the four
cases that were born in our hospital and six cases that were referred to us were
diagnosed prenatally. Eight patients were born at full term with normal birth weight,
two were premature and one showed pre-eclamsia at IUP 34 weeks. The male to female
ratio was 6 to 3 with one patient haying ambiguous genitalia. Tracheo-esophageal
fistula was found in five patients. Three of these five patients died after the parents
refused treatment, and one died the next day after birth even with treatment.
Imperforate anus was observed in seven patients. Unilateral renal agenesis, crossed renal
ectopia and dysplastic kidney were found in four, three (one pelvic kidney, one crossed
renal ectopia with fusion, one crossed renal ectopia) and one patients, respectively. There
was one hypospadias. Six of the eight patients with vertebrae anomaly survived; four of
the survivors had vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) and neurogenic bladder. Two of the four
patients with VUR received ureteroneocystostomy then clean intermittent catheterization
(CIC), sympatholytic and antibiotics. The other two patients with neurogenic bladder
received clean intermittent catheterization (CIC) and vesicostomy. Complications of
recurrent urinary tract infection (UTI) and acute epididymitis occurred when descending
loop colostomy was performed due to imperforate anus and urethro-rectal fistula.
Separated colostomy instead of descending loop colostomy is recommended for
recto-urinary fistula since infections of the upper urinary tract in such cases required
ureteroneocystostomy before the correction of imperforate anus and continued antibiotic
administration was needed because of the possibility of delayed wound healing and
recurrent UTI. A strong will by the patient's parents, protection of renal function
through early detection of genitourinary anomalies and other appropriate treatments are
required for the high success rate in the surgical correction of VATER syndrome.

Å°¿öµå

VATER syndrome; Genitourinary anomalies; Child;

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

   

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed
KAMS