Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¿ä°ü-S»ó°áÀå ¹®ÇÕ¼ú¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀÓ»óÀû °íÂû Clinical Evaluation and Experience of Ureterosigmoidostomy

´ëÇѺñ´¢±â°úÇÐȸÁö 1997³â 38±Ç 12È£ p.1369 ~ 1374
À±º¸¼±, À̹μº,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
À±º¸¼± (  ) 
±¹¸³ÀÇ·á¿ø ºñ´¢±â°ú

À̹μº (  ) 
±¹¸³ÀÇ·á¿ø ºñ´¢±â°ú

Abstract

°á·Ð
1985³â 1¿ùºÎÅÍ 1995³â 2¿ù±îÁö º»À© ºñ´¢±â°ú¿¡¼­ ½Ã¼úµÈ ¿ä°ü-S»ó°áÀå ¹®ÇÕ¼ú 11·Ê¿¡
´ëÇÏ¿© ¼ö¼úÀÇ ÀûÀÀÁõ, ÇÕº´Áõ, ¹æ»ç¼±°Ë»ç¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀÓ»ó°üÂûÀ» ½ÃÇàÇÏ¿´´Ù. ȸÀåµµ°üÀ» ÀÌ¿ë
ÇÑ ¿ä·ÎÀüȯ¼úÀÇ Áõ°¡·Î ÀÎÇÏ¿© ¿ä°ü-S»ó°áÀå ¹®ÇÕ¼úÀº ÃÖ±Ù °ÅÀÇ ½ÃÇàµÇ°í ÀÖÁö ¾Ê´Â ¹æ
¹ýÀ̳ª Á¤È®ÇÑ È¯ÀÚÀÇ ¼±ÅÃ, ¼ö¼ú ¼ú±âÀÇ ¹ß´Þ, ÀåÀÇ ÀåÀÇ º´Å »ý¸®Àû Áö½ÄÀÇ ÃàÀûÀ¸·Î ÃÊ
±â¿¡ ÇÕº´ÁõÀÇ ¹ß»ýÀ» ¿¹¹æ ȤÀº °¨¼ÒÇÏ°Ô ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ¾î ¿ä°ü-S»ó°áÀå ¹®ÇÕ¼úÀÌ 60¼¼ ÀÌ»ó¿¡
¼­ Ç×¹®°ý¾à±Ù ±â´ÉÀÌ Á¤»óÀÌ°í »óºÎ¿ä°üÀÌ È®ÀåµÇÁö ¾Ê°í, Á¤»ó ½Å ±â´É°ú °ñ¹Ý³» ¹æ»ç¼±
Á¶»ç °æ·ÂÀÌ ¾ø´Â ȯÀÚ¿¡¼­ ºñ½Ç±ÝÇü ¿ä·ÎÀüȯ¼úÁß À¯¿ëÇÑ ¼ú±âÀÇ Çϳª·Î Àû¿ëµÉ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â
¼ö¼ú¹æ¹ýÀ̶ó°í »ý°¢ÇÑ´Ù.
#ÃÊ·Ï#
A clinical observation on 11 cases of ureterosigmoidostomy was made on whom had
been operated at the department of Urology from January, 1985 to February, 1995.
Underlying diseases at the time of operation were 9 cases of bladder cancer, 1 case of
prostatic cancer and 1 case of urethrovesicovaginal fistula. In postoperative care, all
patients were instructed to empty the rectum frequently, and took bicarbonate and
potassium supplementation for electrolyte balance. Use of combined method with
antireflux seems to lower the incidence of reflux, pyelonephritis and anastomic site
stricture. This way of diversion supplies a substitute bladder under voluntary control,
devoid of any foreign body, appliance, or necessity of catheterization. We believe that
ureterosigmoidostomy should not be overlooked and should be convenient alternative in
well selected patients who have intact anal sphincter tone and desire a continent form of
internal diversion with normal body shape.

Å°¿öµå

Ureterosigmoidostomy;

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

   

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed
KAMS