Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¾Ç¼ºÁ¾¾ç¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ ¿ä°üÆó»ö½Ã Double-J µµ°üÀ¯Ä¡ °¡´É¼º¿¡ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ÀÎÀÚµé The Factors Influencing on Insertion of Double-J Catheter in Ureteral Obstruction due to Malignancy

´ëÇѺñ´¢±â°úÇÐȸÁö 1998³â 39±Ç 1È£ p.82 ~ 86
¾ÈÀÍÁÖ, Áָ鱸, ì°åÕßµ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
¾ÈÀÍÁÖ (  ) 
°¡Å縯´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ºñ´¢±â°úÇб³½Ç

Áָ鱸 (  ) 
°¡Å縯´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ºñ´¢±â°úÇб³½Ç
ì°åÕßµ (  ) 
°¡Å縯´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ºñ´¢±â°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract

¼­·Ð
º¹°­³» ¾Ç¼ºÁ¾¾çÀº Á÷Á¢ ħÀ±À̳ª ÀÓÆļ±ÀüÀÌ·Î ÀÎÇÑ ÀÓÆÄÀý Á¾´ë, ¶Ç´Â Á¾¾ç¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼ö
¼úÀ̳ª ¹æ»ç¼±Ä¡·á ÈÄ¿¡ Á¶Á÷ÀÇ ¼¶À¯È­¿Í À¯Âø¿¡ ÀÇÇØ ¿ä°üÀ» Æó»ö½Ãų ¼ö ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, ÀÌ·Î ÀÎ
ÇÏ¿© ½Å±â´ÉÀÇ ±Þ¼ÓÇÑ ÀúÇϸ¦ ÀÏÀ¸Å³ ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù ¿ä°üÀÇ ºÎºÐÀû ¶Ç´Â ¿ÏÀüÆó»öÀ» ÀÏÀ¸Å³ ¼ö ÀÖ
´Â º¹°­³» ¾Ç¼º Á¾¾çÀº ÀڱðæºÎ, ³­¼Ò, °áÀå, Àü¸³¼±, ¹æ±¤ µî¿¡ »ý±ä Á¾¾çµéÀ̸ç, À̵é Á¾
¾çÁß ÀڱðæºÎ¾ÏÀü¸³¼±¾ÏÀÌ °¡Àå ÈçÇÏ´Ù. ÀڱðæºÎ¾ÏÀÇ °¡Àå ÈçÇÑ »ç¸Á¿øÀÎÀº Á¾¾çÀ¸·Î ÀÎ
ÇÑ ¿ä°üÆó»öÀ¸·Î ÀÎÇÏ¿© ÀÌÂ÷ÀûÀ¸·Î ¿À´Â ½ÅºÎÀüÀ̶ó°í ¾Ë·ÁÁ® Àִµ¥, ÀÌ °æ¿ì¿¡ ¿ä°üÆó
»öÀ» ÇØ°áÇÔÀ¸·Î½á »ýÁ¸À²À» Áõ°¡½Ãų ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ Kahn°ú Utz3¿¡ ÀÇÇϸé
Àü¸³¼±¾Ï¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ ¾çÃø ¿ä°üÆó»öÀº ÀüÀ̼º ÀÓÆļ± Á¾´ë¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ °Íº¸´Ù´Â Á¾¾ç ÀÚü°¡ ±â°èÀû
ÀÎ ¾Ð¹Ú ¶Ç´Â ¿ä°üº®¿¡ÀÇ Ä§¹üÀ¸·Î ¿Â´Ù°í ÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ¿ä°üÆó»öÀ» ¿ÏÈ­½ÃÄÑ »ý¸í¿¬Àå
À» ±â´ëÇÒ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù°í ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ±Ù·¡¿¡´Â ¸»±â Á¾¾çȯÀÚÀÇ °æ¿ì¿¡¼­ ¹æ»ç¼±Ä¡·á ¹× Ç×¾ÏÄ¡·áÀÇ
¹ß´Þ·Î °ú°Åº¸´Ù »ýÁ¸±â°£ÀÌ Áõ°¡µÇ¾úÀ¸³ª À̵é ȯÀÚ¿¡¼­ ¿ä°üÆó»öÀÌ ¹ß»ýµÈ °æ¿ì ¿ä°ü³»
double-J µµ°üÀ¯Ä¡³ª °æÇÇÀû½Å·ç¼³Ä¡¼úÀ» ½ÃÇàÇÏ¿©¾ß ÇÑ´Ù. ±×·¯³ª ¿ä°üÆó»ö½Ã ´ÜÁö ¿äÀÇ
¹èÃâÀ̶ó´Â ¹®Á¦»Ó¸¸ ¾Æ´Ï¶ó ȯÀÚÀÇ Á¤½ÅÀûÀÎ ¸é°ú »çȸÀûÀÎ ¸é, ¶ÇÇÑ ÀÏ»óÈ°¿¡¼­ÀÇ °£Æí¼º
µîÀ» °í·ÁÇÒ ¶§ °æÇÇÀû½Å·ç¼³ Ä¡¼úº¸´Ù´Â ¿ä°ü³» double-J µµ°üÀ¯Ä¡¼úÀÌ ¿ì¼±ÀûÀ¸·Î ½ÃÇà
µÉ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ¹æ¹ýÀ̶ó°í »ý°¢µÈ´Ù. µû¶ó¼­ double-J µµ°üÀ¯Ä¡¼úÀ» ½ÃÇàÇϱâ Àü¿¡ ¼³Ä¡ °¡´É
¼º ¿©ºÎ¸¦ ¹Ì¸® ¿¹°ßÇÏ¿© ȯÀÚ¿¡°Ô ºÒÇÊ¿äÇÑ °íÅëÀ» ´ú¾îÁÙ ÇÊ¿ä°¡ ÀÖ´Ù°í »ý°¢ÇÑ´Ù. ÀÌ¿¡
ÀúÀÚµéÀº º¹°­³» ¾Ç¼ºÁ¾¾çȯÀÚÁß¿¡¼­ ¿ä°üÆó»öÀ¸·Î ¿ä°ü³» double-J µµ°üÀ¯Ä¡¸¦ ½ÃµµÇÏ¿´´ø
43¸íÀÇ È¯ÀÚµéÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î double-J µµ°ü»ðÀÔ¿¡ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ÀÎÀÚµéÀ» ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿© double-J
µµ°ü»ðÀÔ °¡¼ºÀ» ¿¹°ßÇÏ°íÀÚ ÇÑ´Ù.
#ÃÊ·Ï#
Purpose: The aim of this presentation is to analyze the factors influencing on
retrograde insertion of double-J catheter in urethral obstruction due to malignancy and
to predict the possibility of stunting with double-J catheter.
Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of 43 patients who had underwent
retrograde double-J catheter insertion for urethral obstruction secondary to pelvic
malignancy, from January 1993 to April 1997, was performed to evaluate the success
rates of double-J ureteral stenting according to the factors such as age, sex, presence or
absence of flank pain, degree of hydronephrosis, renal function, stage of tumor, laterality
of ureter, past history of radiotherapy, operation and chemotherapy.
Results: According to the degree of hydronephrosis, the success rate was 100, 73.7 and
50% in grade I II and III, respectively(p<0.05). According to the renal function, the
success rate was 81.3% in the group with normal renal function and 45.5% in the group
with abnormal venal function(p<0.05) According to the stage of disease, the success rate
was 100, 70.7 and 58.3% in stage I, II and III, respectively. According to the absence or
presence of flank pain, the success rate was 56.3% in the group with flank pain and
81.5% in the group without flank pain. According to the past history of radiotherapy, the
success rate was 65.6% in the group treated with radiotherapy and 90.9% in the group
not treated with radiotherapy. The age, sex, laterality of ureter, past history of operation
and chemotherapy were not significantly correlated to the success rates.
Conclusions: The factors influencing on double-J ureteral slanting were the degree of
hydronephrosis, renal function, absence or presence of flank pain, stage of disease and
past history of radiotherapy Further study will be needed to demonstrate the accurate
timing of urethral stenting with doublets ureteral catheter.

Å°¿öµå

Malignancy; Urethral obstruction; Ureteral stent;

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

   

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed
KAMS