Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

½Å¹è°á¼®ÀÇ À§Ä¡¿¡ µû¸¥ ü¿ÜÃæ°ÝÆļ⼮¼úÀÇ È¿°ú Effect of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy of Caliceal Stone according to the Location of the Stone

´ëÇѺñ´¢±â°úÇÐȸÁö 1998³â 39±Ç 2È£ p.138 ~ 140
ÃÖâÈÆ, ÃÖȣö, ÃÖ¼ºÇù,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
ÃÖâÈÆ (  ) 
ÀÎÁ¦´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ºñ´¢±â°úÇб³½Ç

ÃÖȣö (  ) 
ÀÎÁ¦´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ºñ´¢±â°úÇб³½Ç
ÃÖ¼ºÇù (  ) 
ÀÎÁ¦´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ºñ´¢±â°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract

¼­·Ð
ÇöÀç ½ÅÀå°ú ¿ä°ü°á¼® ȯÀÚÀÇ 70%´Â ü¿ÜÃæ°ÝÆļ⼮¼ú¸¸À¸·Î Ä¡·áµÇ¸ç 15%´Â ü¿ÜÃæ°Ý
Æļ⼮¼ú¿Ü¿¡ ³»ºñ´¢±â°úÀû ½Ã¼úÀÌ ÇÊ¿äÇϸç, 15%´Â ³»ºñ´¢±â°úÀû ½Ã¼úÀ̳ª °üÇ÷Àû ¼ö¼úÀ»
ÇÊ¿ä·Î ÇÑ´Ù.
½Å¹è°á¼®¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Ã¼¿ÜÃæ°ÝÆļ⼮¼úÀÇ È¿°ú¿¡ ¿µÇâÀ» ÁÖ´Â ÀÎÀÚÁß °á¼®ÀÇ Å©±â¿Í À§Ä¡°¡ °¡
Àå Áß¿äÇÑ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¾Ë·ÁÁ® ÀÖ´Ù.
º» ±³½Ç¿¡¼­´Â 1994³â 1¿ùºÎÅÍ 1995³â 12¿ù±îÁö ½Å¹è°á¼®À¸·Î Á¦3¼¼´ë ¼â¼®±âÀÎ EDAP
LT-02¾ÐÀü½Ä ¼â¼®±â¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© Ä¡·áÇÑ 119·ÊÀÇ È¯ÀÚ¿¡¼­ °¢ ½Å¹èº°°á¼®¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Ä¡·á°á°ú
¸¦ Á¶»çÇÏ¿© ¹®Çå°íÂû°ú ÇÔ²² º¸°íÇÏ´Â ¹ÙÀÌ´Ù.
#ÃÊ·Ï#
Purpose: Lower caliceal stones treated with ESWL do fail to pass more frequently
than middle or upper caliceal stones. We analyzed the results of ESWL of renal caliceal
stones according to the location of calix.
Materials and Methods: We reviewed the stone-free rate in 119 caliceal stone patients
treated with 3rd generation lithotriptor, EDAP LT-02 according to the caliceal location
of the stone. Location of the stones were upper calix in 30, middle calix in 30, and
lower calix in 59 patients.
Results: Stone-free rate was 90.0%(27/30 patients) in middle caliceal stones,
74.6%(44/59 patients) in lower caliceal stones, and 66.7%(20/30 patients) in upper caliceal
stones.
Conclusions: Stone-free rate of lower caliceal stones is higher than upper caliceal
stones.

Å°¿öµå

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy; Renal caliceal stone;

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

   

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed
KAMS