Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

±â´ÉÀû ¹è´¢Àå¾Ö¸¦ µ¿¹ÝÇÑ ¹æ±¤¿ä°ü ¿ª·ù ȯ¾Æµé¿¡¼­ÀÇ ºñµð¿À-¿ä·ù ¿ªÇа˻ç Video-Urodynamic Study in Children with Vesicoureteral Reflux and Voiding Dysfunction

´ëÇѺñ´¢±â°úÇÐȸÁö 1998³â 39±Ç 6È£ p.558 ~ 562
±è±¤¸í, ³ëÀç¿ä, ¹Ú°üÇö,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
±è±¤¸í (  ) 
¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ºñ´¢±â°úÇб³½Ç

³ëÀç¿ä (  ) 
¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ºñ´¢±â°úÇб³½Ç
¹Ú°üÇö (  ) 
¼º±Õ°ü´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ºñ´¢±â°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract

¼­·Ð
¹æ±¤¿ä°ü¿ª·ù ȯ¾Æµé¿¡¼­ ¿ª·ù¿Í ±â´ÉÀû ¹è´¢Àå¾Ö ¹× ¿ä·Î °¨¿° »çÀÌ¿¡ »ó°ü°ü°è°¡ ÀÖ´Ù
´Â º¸°íµéÀÌ ¸¹´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ ´Ù¾çÇÑ ¹æ±¤ÀÇ ±â´ÉÀû ÀÌ»óÀÌ ¹æ±¤¿ä°ü¿ª·ùÀÇ ¿¹ÈÄ¿¡ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¥
°ÍÀ̶ó´Â Á¦½Ã°¡ ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. µû¶ó¼­ ¹æ±¤¿ä°ü¿ª·ù ȯ¾Æµé¿¡¼­ ¹æ±¤ÀÇ ±â´ÉÀû ÀÌ»óÀÌ ¹æ±¤¿ä°ü
¿ª·ù¿Í ¶Ñ·ÇÀÌ »ó°ü°ü°è°¡ ÀÖ´Ù¸é ±â´ÉÀû ¹è´¢Àå¾Ö°¡ ÀǽɵǴ °æ¿ì ¿ì¼±ÀûÀ¸·Î ¹æ±¤ÀÇ ±â
´ÉÀû ÀÌ»ó À¯¹«¿¡ ´ëÇÑ È®Àΰú Ä¡·á°¡ ¼±ÇàµÇ¾î¾ß ÇÒ °ÍÀÌ´Ù. ±×·¯³ª À̵鿡 ´ëÇÑ ±¸Ã¼Àû
Àΰú°ü°è¸¦ ¹àÈ÷±â À§ÇÑ Á¤È®ÇÑ ºÐ¼®Àû ÀÚ·á´Â ¾ÆÁ÷µµ ºÎÁ·ÇÑ »óÅÂÀÌ´Ù. ±â´ÉÀû ¹è´¢Àå¾Ö¶õ
¿ë¾î´Â ¾ÆÁ÷ ±¹Á¦ÀûÀ¸·Î Á¤ÀÇ°¡ È®¸³µÇ¾î ÀÖÁö´Â ¾ÊÁö¸¸ ¿¬±¸ÀÚµé ³ª¸§´ë·Î ÀÌ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀÇ°ß
À» Á¦½ÃÇÏ°í ÀÖ´Ù. EhrlichµîÀº ´ëºÎºÐÀÇ ±â´ÉÀû ¹è´¢Àå¾Ö´Â ¹è´¢ÈÆ·Ã °úÁ¤¿¡¼­ ¿À´Â ºÒ¾ÈÁ¤
¹æ±¤ÀÌ ¿øÀÎÀÌ µÇ¸ç, ÀÓ»óÀûÀ¸·Î´Â ºó´¢, ±Þ¹Ú´¢ Á־߰£ ¿ä½Ç±Ý, ¶Ç´Â ¿ä½Ç±ÝÀ» ¸·±â À§ÇØ
Âɱ׸®°í ¾É´Â ÀÚ¼¼ µîÀÇ Æ¯Â¡Àû ¼Ò°ßÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³­´Ù°í ÇÏ¿´´Ù. Gool µîÀº ¼³¹®Á¶»ç¸¦ ¹ÙÅÁ
À¸·Î ÇÑ ±¹Á¦ ¼Ò¾Æ¿ª·ù ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­ ±â´ÉÀû ¹è´¢Àå¾Ö¸¦ ±Þ¹Ú´¢, ½ºÅ¸Ä«Åä ¹è´¢, ºÎºÐÀûÀÎ ºÒ¿Ï
Àü ¹è´¢ ±×¸®°í ¹è´¢Áö¿¬ µî ³× °¡Áö ÇüÅ·Π±¸ºÐÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, °¢°¢¿¡¼­ Ư¡ÀûÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³ª´Â
¿ä·ù ¿ªÇÐ°Ë»ç ¼Ò°ßÀ» Á¦½ÃÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÀúÀÚµéÀº ¹æ±¤¿ä°ü¿ª·ù ȯ¾Æµé Áß ±â´ÉÀû ¹è´¢Àå¾Ö°¡ ÀÇ
½ÉµÇ´Â Áõ»óÀÌ ÀÖ´Â °æ¿ì ºñµð¿À-¿ä·ù¿ªÇа˻縦 ½Ç½ÃÇÏ¿´°í, ±× ¼Ò°ßÀ» ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿© ¹æ±¤¿ä°ü
¿ª·ù¿¡ ÈçÈ÷ µ¿¹ÝµÇ´Â ¹æ±¤ÀÇ ±â´ÉÀû ÀÌ»ó ¹× ¾çÀÚ°£ÀÇ »ó°ü°ü°è¸¦ ¾Ë¾Æº½À¸·Î½á ÇâÈÄ À̵é
ÀÇ °ü¸®ÁöħÀ» ¸¶·ÃÇϴµ¥ µµ¿òÀ» ¾ò°íÀÚ ÇÏ¿´´Ù.

Purpose : Voiding dysfunction is known to affect on the result of treatment for
vesicoureteral reflux(VUR) in children. The aim of this study is to find out specific
urodynamic abnormality in the children with VUR and voiding dysfunction.
Materials and Methods : We evaluated 16 children having VUR with voiding
dysfunction symptoms. Voiding symptoms were frequency, urgency, urge incontinence,
nocturnal enuresis and voiding postponement. An awake video-urodynamic
study(video-UDS) was performed without anesthesia.
Results : Urodynamic abnormalities were found in 11 children(69%). The most
common urodynamic abnormality was uninhibited detrusor contraction(10 cases, 63%),
and 8 of these patients had urgency and/or urge incontinence. Other urodynamic
abnormalities were small maximum cystometric capacity(5 cases, 31%), and detrusor
sphincter dyssynergia(DSD)(3 cases, 19%). All the children with DSD had voiding
postponement. VUR was found in 8 children(50%) during video-UDS. Among the
urodynamic parameters small cystometric bladder capacity was found to be a most
significant factor in predicting low Pressure VUR(sensitivity 100%, specificity 100%,
p=0.018).
Conclusions : These results suggest that abnormal detrusor activity is more frequent
than abnormal coordination between detrusor and external sphincter activity in the
children with VUR and voiding dysfunction symptoms. And small maximum cystometric
capacity seems to be a significant urodynamic parameter for perpetuating VUR in these
children. (Korean J Urol 1998; 39: 558¡­62)

Å°¿öµå

Vesicoureteral reflux; Voiding dysfunction; Video-urodynamic study;

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

   

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed
KAMS