Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

º¹ºÎµÐ»ó¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ ½Å¼Õ»ó ȯÀÚÀÇ ÀÓ»óÀû °íÂû Clinical Evaluation of Blunt Renal Trauma

´ëÇѺñ´¢±â°úÇÐȸÁö 1998³â 39±Ç 7È£ p.638 ~ 642
ÀÌÈ£½Â, ±Ç°æÀÏ, ¿°±Ô¿µ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
ÀÌÈ£½Â (  ) 
À»ÁöÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ºñ´¢±â°úÇб³½Ç

±Ç°æÀÏ (  ) 
À»ÁöÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ºñ´¢±â°úÇб³½Ç
¿°±Ô¿µ (  ) 
À»ÁöÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ºñ´¢±â°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract

¼­·Ð
»ê¾÷ÀÇ °íµµÈ­¿Í ÀÚµ¿Â÷ÀÇ Áõ°¡ ¹× ´Ù¾çÇÑ ·¹Àú½ºÆ÷Ã÷ÀÇ º¸±ÞÀ¸·Î ÀÎÇØ ½Å¼Õ»ó ȯÀÚÀÇ ¹ß
»ýºóµµ°¡ Áõ°¡ÇÏ°í ÀÖ´Ù. ´ëºÎºÐÀÇ ½Å¼Õ»ó ¿øÀÎÀº ±³Åë»ç°í ¹× »ê¾÷Àå¿¡¼­ÀÇ ¾ÈÀü»ç°í µîÀÌ
¸ç, µû¶ó¼­ º¸»ó°ú °ü·ÃµÈ ¹ýÀûÀÎ ¹®Á¦°¡ °ü·ÃµÉ °æ¿ì°¡ ¸¹±â ¶§¹®¿¡ Á¤È®ÇÑ Áø´Ü ¹× Ä¡·á
°¡ ÇÊ¿äÇÏ´Ù µû¶ó¼­ ÀúÀÚµéÀº ½Å¼Õ»ó ȯÀÚÀÇ ÀûÀýÇÑ Áø´Ü¹æ¹ý°ú Ä¡·á¹æħÀ» ¾Ë±â À§ÇÏ¿© ÃÖ
±Ù 6³â°£ º»¿ø¿¡ ³»¿øÇÑ ½Å¼Õ»ó ȯÀÚµé Áß¿¡¼­ º¹ºÎµÐ»ó¿¡ ÀÇÇØ ½Å¼Õ»óÀ» ¹ÞÀº 103¸íÀ» ´ë
»óÀ¸·Î ¼Õ»óÀÇ ¿øÀÎ µ¿¹Ý¼Õ»ó¿©ºÎ, Ç÷´¢ÀÇ Á¤µµ, ¹æ»ç¼±¼Ò°ß ¹× Ä¡·á¹æ¹ý µîÀ» ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù.
#ÃÊ·Ï#
Purpose : The evaluation of patients with suspected blunt renal trauma relies mainly
on clinical assessment, urinalysis and imaging studies. For the evaluation of the effects
of various factors in patients with blunt renal trauma, we performed this study.
Materials and Methods : We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 103
patients who presented to our hospital with blunt renal trauma between 1991 and 1996.
Results: A total of 103 patients presented to our hospital with suspected blunt renal
trauma. There were 72 male and 31 female between 8 and 82 years old (mean 35.7).
Traffic accident was the most common cause of injury, accounting for 54.4%(56 cases).
The remaining injuries were caused by falls in 30 cases (29.1%), assault in 15(14.6%)
and sports-related trauma in 2(1.9%). Renal injuries were classified as established by
the Organ Injury Scaling Committee of the American Association for the Surgery of
Trauma in 1989. There were 61 cases(59.2%) grade I, 15(14.6%) grade II, 8(7.8%) grade
III, II(10.6%) grade IV and 8(7.8%) grade V. Of the 103 patients 58 had microscopic
hematuria and 40 had gross hematuria. We found that the degree of hematuria does not
correlate with the severity of renal injury. 54 patients(52.4%) had a total of 69
associated injuries, including extremity fracture In 21, rib fracture in 14, pelvic fracture
in 14, liver injury in 6, closed head injury in 6, spinal fracture in 3, bowel injury in 3
and spleen injury in 2. Surgical exploration was required in 15 patients(14.6%) for renal
or associated injuries.
Conclusions : We should be managed blunt renal injuries with a consistent approach
based on accurate injury definition from clinical, radiographic, and sometimes surgical
staging. Accurate renal injury staging was essential to successful management of
traumatized patients.
(Korean J Urol 1998; 39: 638¡­42)

Å°¿öµå

Blunt trauma; Renal injury;

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

   

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed
KAMS