Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Àü¸³¼±¾Ï ¹× Àü¸³¼±ºñ´ëÁõ¿¡¼­ÀÇ bel-2¿Í P53 ´Ü¹é ¹ßÇö The Effect of Urethral Catheter on Pressure-Flow Study

´ëÇѺñ´¢±â°úÇÐȸÁö 1998³â 39±Ç 7È£ p.656 ~ 661
À̺´ÅÂ, ¼Õ½Â¿ø, ¹Úöȸ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
À̺´Å (  ) 
°è¸í´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ºñ´¢±â°úÇб³½Ç

¼Õ½Â¿ø (  ) 
°è¸í´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ º´¸®Çб³½Ç
¹Úöȸ (  ) 
°è¸í´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ºñ´¢±â°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract

¼­·Ð
p53 À¯ÀüÀÚ´Â ÀÎü 17¹ø ¿°»öüÀÇ ´Ü¿Ï¿¡ À§Ä¡ÇÏ´Â Á¾¾ç¾ïÁ¦À¯ÀüÀÚ·Î1ÃÖ±Ù ÀÎüÀÇ ¿©·¯
¾Ç¼ºÁ¾¾ç¿¡¼­ ÀÌÀ¯ÀüÀÚÀÇ µ¹¿¬º¯ÀÌ ¶Ç´Â ºÒÈ°¼ºÈ­ µîÀÇ À¯ÀüÀû º¯ÀÌ°¡ °üÂûµÇ¾î p53À¯ÀüÀÚ
ÀÇ À¯ÀüÀû ÇüÁúº¯È­°¡ ¾Ï¼¼Æ÷ Çü¼º¿¡ Áß¿äÇÑ ÀÛ¿ëÀ» ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î »ý°¢µÇ°í ÀÖ´Ù.
Bcl-2´Â 18¹ø ¿°»öü¿¡ À§Ä¡ÇÏ´Â ¿øÁ¾¾çÀ¯ÀüÀÚ(pro-tooncogene)·Î ¼¼Æ÷°í»ç(apoptosis)¶ó
°í ¾Ë·ÁÁ® ÀÖ´Â °èȹµÈ ¼¼Æ÷»ç¸Á(programmed cell death)À» ¹æÇØÇÏ¿© ¼¼Æ÷ÀÇ »ýÁ¸À» ¿¬Àå½Ã
Å°´Â ±â´ÉÀ» ¼öÇàÇÑ´Ù. ÀÌ´Â ¿°»öüÀÇ ÀüÁ t(14;18)¸¦ °¡Áö°í ÀÖ´Â ¿©Æ÷¼º¸²ÇÁÁ¾(fouicular
lymphoma)¿¡¼­ ÃÖÃÊ·Î ¹ß°ßµÇ¾úÀ¸¸ç, ±× À¯ÀüÀÚ »ê¹°ÀÎ bcl-2 ´Ü¹éÀº ¹ÌÅäÄܵ帮¾Æ¿Í ³»Çü
Áú¼¼¸Á, ÇÙ¸·¿¡¼­ ¹ßÇöµÇ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ¾Ë·ÁÁ® ÀÖ´Ù. ÃʱâÀÇ ¿¬±¸°á°ú¿Í´Â ´Þ¸® bcl-2À¯ÀüÀÚÀÇ
¹ßÇöÀÌ ´Ù¼öÀÇ ºñÇ÷¾× ¸²ÇÁÁ¶Á÷¿¡¼­ È®ÀεǾú°í, ÃÖ±ÙÀÇ ¿¬±¸°á°ú¿¡ ÀÇÇϸé ÆóÀÇ ºñ¼Ò¼¼Æ÷
¾Ï, ºñÀεξÏ, ½Å°æ¾Æ¼¼Æ÷Á¾, À¯¹æ¾Ï ¹× Àü¸³¼±¾Ï µîÀÇ °íÇüÁ¾¾ç¿¡¼­µµ bcl-2°¡ ¹ßÇöÇϸç ÀÌ
ÀÇ ¹ßÇöÀÌ È¯ÀÚÀÇ ¿¹ÈĿ͵µ ¹ÐÁ¢ÇÑ °ü·ÃÀÌ ÀÖ´Ù°í º¸°íµÇ¾îÀÖ´Ù.
ÀÌ¿¡, ÀúÀÚµéÀº Àü¸²¼±¾Ï Á¶Á÷°ú ¾ç¼ºÀý¸³¼±ºñ´ëÁß Á¶Á÷¿¡¼­ ¸é¿ªÁ¶Á÷È­ÇÐÀû ¹æ¹ýÀ¸·Î
p53, bcl-2ÀÇ ¹ßÇöÀ²À» ºñ±³ÇÏ¿´°í, Àü¸³¼±¾Ï¿¡¼­´Â ±âÁ¸ÀÇ ¿¹ÈÄÀÎÀÚ·Î ¾Ë·ÁÁø ÀÓ»óº´±â,
Gleason grads¿ÍÀÇ °ü°è¸¦ ºñ±³ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù.
#ÃÊ·Ï#
Purpose : The effect of a urethral catheter on pressure-flow study has important
implications for the practice and interpretation of pressure flow studies. We wonder
which catheter would be adequate for pressure flow study. We report 3 different size of
catheters(4Fr, 10Fr, 12Fr) effects on urinary flow rate, voiding pressures and pressure
flow plot.
Materials and Methods : Pressure flow studies were carried out on 141
patients(male;88, female;53), whose diseases were BPH in 22, prostatodynia in 37,urethral
syndrome in 36, Hinman syndrome in 2, neurogenic bladder in 28, unstable bladder in
10, urethral stricture in 2 and bladder stone in 2.
Results : There was no significant difference between pre- and postcatheterization
maximum flow rate in 4Fr group. But there were significant difference between pre-
and post-catheterization maximum flow rate in 10Fr and 12Fr group. The detrusor
pressure was significantly higher in 10Fr and 12Fr group than in 4Fr group. The larger
size of catheter groups had more obstructive patterns in pressure flow plot.
Conclusions : These results showed 4Fr catheter had less effect on pressure flow
study than 10Fr, 12Fr catheter. (Korean J Urol 1998; 39: 662¡­5)

Å°¿öµå

Urethral catheter; Pressure flow study;

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

   

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed
KAMS