Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¿©¼º º¹¾Ð¼º¿ä½Ç±Ý¿¡¼­ ÀüÁúº®½½¸µ¼ö¼úÀÇ È¿°ú Anterior Vaginal Wall Sling for Female Stress Urinary Incontinence

´ëÇѺñ´¢±â°úÇÐȸÁö 1998³â 39±Ç 7È£ p.689 ~ 693
À̱Լº, ÁÖ¿µ¼ö,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
À̱Լº (  ) 
¼º±Õ°ü´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ °­ºÏ»ï¼ºº´¿ø

ÁÖ¿µ¼ö (  ) 
¿ï»ê´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ºñ´¢±â°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract

¼­·Ð
¿©¼º º¹¾Ð¼º¿ä½Ç±ÝÀÇ ¼ö¼ú¹æ¹ýÀº ¸Å¿ì ´Ù¾çÇÏ¿© ¼ö¼úÀڴ ȯÀÚÀÇ ÀÓ»ó¼Ò°ß, ¿ä¿ªµ¿Çа˻ç
°á°ú ¹× ¼ö¼úÀÇ Æ¯¼ºÀ» °í·ÁÇÏ¿© ¼ö¼ú ¹æ¹ýÀ» ¼±ÅÃÇÏ°Ô µÈ´Ù ÃÖ±Ù ¿¬±¸°á°ú ¿©¼º º¹¾Ð¼º¿ä
½Ç±ÝÀÇ ¿øÀÎÀ¸·Î ³»Àμº¿äµµ°ý¾à ±Ù±â´ÉºÎÀü(intrinsic sphinctenc deficiency)ÀÇ Á߿伺ÀÌ ´ë
µÎµÇ¸é¼­ ¸ðµç º¹¾Ð¼º¿ä½Ç±Ý ȯÀÚ´Â Á¤µµÀÇ Â÷ÀÌ´Â ÀÖÁö¸¸ ³»Àμº¿äµµ°ý¾à±Ù±â´ÉºÎÀüÀÇ ¿ä
¼Ò¸¦ °®°í ÀÖ´Ù°í ¾Ë·ÁÁ® ÀÖ´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ ¹æ±¤°æºÎÇö¼ö ¼ö¹ýÀº Àå±â ÃßÀû °Ë»ç¿¡¼­ ³ôÀº Àç¹ßÀ²
À» º¸ÀÌ°í ÀÖ´Ù. µû¶ó¼­ ÇغÎÇÐÀû ¿ä½Ç±Ý(anatomical incontinence)¿¡´Â ¹æ±¤°æºÎÇö¼ö ¼ö¹ý
À», ³»Àμº¿äµµ°ý¾à±Ù±â´ÉºÎÀü¿¡´Â ½½¸µ¼ö¼úÀ» Àû¿ëÇÏ´ø ±âÁ¸ÀÇ Ä¡·á¿øÄ¢¿¡µµ º¯È­¸¦ º¸¿©
½½¸µ¼ö¼úÀÇ Àû¿ë ¹üÀ§´Â ´õ¿í È®´ëµÇ°í ÀÖ´Ù ±×·¯³ª ±âÁ¸ ½½¸µ¼ö¼úÀº ¼ú±âÀû º¹ÀâÇÔ°ú ³ôÀº
ÇÕº´ÁõÀÌ ¹®Á¦°¡ µÇ°í ÀÖ´Ù ÃÖ±Ù Raz µîÀº ÇغÎÇÐÀû¿ä½Ç±Ý°ú ³»Àμº¿äµµ°ý¾à±Ù±â´ÉºÎÀü ȯ
ÀÚ ¸ðµÎ¿¡°Ô Àû¿ë °¡´ÉÇÑ ÀüÁúº®À» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ½½¸µ¼ö¼úÀÎ ÀüÁúº®½½¸µ¼ö¼ú(anterior vaginal
wall sling)À» ½ÃÇàÇÏ¿© ÁÁÀº ¼ºÀûÀ» º¸°íÇÏ¿´´Ù.
ÀúÀÚµéÀº »õ·Î¿î ½½¸µ¼ö¼ú ±â¹ýÀÎ ÀüÁúº®½½¸µ¼ö¼úÀ» ½ÃÇàÇÑ ¿©¼º º¹¾Ð¼º¿ä½Ç±Ý 46¿¹ÀÇ °á
°ú¸¦ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿© ÀüÁúº®½½¸µ¼ö¼úÀÇ È¿°ú ¹× À¯¿ë¼ºÀ» ¾Ë¾Æº¸°íÀÚ ÇÏ¿´´Ù.
#ÃÊ·Ï#
Purpose : The vaginal wall sling was introduced by Raz as a simpler and lessmorbid
alternative to fascial or synthetic slings for the treatment of female stress urinary
incontinence. The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety of
anterior vaginal wall sling in the management of women with anatomical
incontinence(Al) and intrinsic sphincteric deficiency(ISD).
Materials arid Methods : We performed vaginal wall sling on 46 consecutive women
with stress incontinence. Preoperative evaluation included voiding cystourethrogaphy,
urodynamic study, cystocsopy and incontinence staging with SEAPI classification.
Postoperative subjective SEAPI outcome measures and assessment of complications were
checked on a 3-month basis.
Results : Of the patients 19(49%) had Al and 27(59%) had ISD. Median follow-up
was 8 months (range 6 to 10). Mean operation time was 65 minutes. At follow-up all of
the patients reported no stress incontinence and 15% reported urge incontinence. De
novo urge incontinence did not occur. Complications included prolonged voiding
difficulty(8,7%), suprapubic pain(8.7%), and pain on leg abduction(4.3%). Four patients
had a prolonged time to gain complete bladder emptying, which required more than 3
weeks to resolve. Permanent urinary retention has not occurred in any patient.
Conclusions : Vaginal wall sling is a safe, simple and effective procedure for the
treatment of stress urinary incontinence due to Al and ISD.
(Korean J Urol 1998; 39: 689¡­93)

Å°¿öµå

Stress urinary incontinence; Anterior vaginal wall sling;

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

   

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed
KAMS