Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¸¸¼ºÀü¸³¼±¿° ȯÀÚ¿¡¼­ »öµµÇ÷¯ ÃÊÀ½ÆÄ ¼Ò°ßÀÇ ÀÇÀÇ The Diagnostic Value of the Color Doppler Ultrasonography in Chronic Prostatitis

´ëÇѺñ´¢±â°úÇÐȸÁö 1998³â 39±Ç 10È£ p.968 ~ 971
Çã³²¹è, ±èÇö¿ì, Á¶¿ø¿­,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
Çã³²¹è (  ) 
´ëµ¿º´¿ø ºñ´¢±â°ú

±èÇö¿ì (  ) 
´ëµ¿º´¿ø ºñ´¢±â°ú
Á¶¿ø¿­ (  ) 
´ëµ¿º´¿ø ºñ´¢±â°ú

Abstract

¼­·Ð
Àü¸³¼±¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÃÊÀ½ÆÄ°Ë»ç´Â Watanabe µî¿¡ ÀÇÇÏ¿© °æÁ÷ÀåÃÊÀ½ÆÄ ±â±â°¡ ¼Ò°³µÈ ÀÌÈÄ Àü
¸³¼±¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÇغÎÇÐÀû Áö½ÄÀÇ ÃàÀû°ú °æÁ÷ÀåÃÊÀ½ÆÄ¿µ»ó¼úÀÇ ±â¼úÀû Áøº¸·Î ÀÎÇØ °ý¸ñÇÒ ¸¸
ÇÑ ¼º°ú¸¦ º¸¾ÒÀ¸³ª ¾ÆÁ÷±îÁö ÀÌÀüÀÇ ÃÊÀ½ÆÄ(gray scale) ¿µ»ó¼Ò°ß ¸¸À¸·Î Áø´ÜÇϱ⿡´Â ºÎ
Á·ÇÑ Á¡ÀÌ ¸¹¾Ò´Ù. µû¶ó¼­ À̸¦ º¸¿ÏÇϱâ À§ÇÑ ÇÑ°¡Áö ¹æ¹ýÀ¸·Î »öµµÇ÷¯¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ÃÊÀ½ÆÄ
¿µ»ó¼úÀÌ ¿©·¯ Áúȯ¿¡¼­ ÀÀ¿ëµÇ¾î ¿ÔÀ¸¸ç, Àü¸³¼± Áúȯ¿¡¼­µµ Áø´ÜÀû °¨¼ö¼º°ú ƯÀ̼ºÀ» °³
¼±½Ãų °ÍÀ¸·Î ¾ð±ÞµÇ¾ú´Ù. »öµµÇ÷¯ ÃÊÀ½ÆÄ°Ë»ç´Â ½Ç½Ã°£ ¿µ»ó(real-time image)¿¡¼­ Á÷Á¢
Ç÷·ùÀÇ Á¸ÀçÀ¯¹«, Ç÷·ùÀÇ ¹æÇâ, Ç÷·ùÀÇ ¼Óµµ »Ó ¾Æ´Ï¶ó ÀÌÁß ÃÊÀ½ÆÄ°Ë»ç(duplex Doppler
sonography)¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ¿©·¯ Áö¼öµéÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© Ç÷·ùÀÇ Æ¯¼ºÀ» ºÐ¼®ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ¹æ¹ýÀ¸·Î °¢
Á¾ ÁúȯÀÇ Áø´Ü ¹× °¨º° µî¿¡ ³Î¸® ÀÌ¿ëµÇ°í ÀÖ´Ù. ƯÈ÷, ½Å»ýÇ÷°üÀÌ Çü¼ºµÇ´Â Á¾¾çÀÇ °æ¿ì
¿¡ ±× À¯¿ë¼ºÀº ³Î¸® ¾Ë·ÁÁ® ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, ¿°Áõ¼Ò°ßÀÌ ÀÖ´Â °æ¿ì¿¡µµ Ç÷·ùÀÇ Áõ°¡·Î ÀÎÇÏ¿© »öµµ
Ç÷¯ ¿µ»óÀÌ º¯È­µÉ °¡´É¼ºÀÌ ÀÖ´Ù.
ºñ´¢±â°ú Áúȯ Áß ¸¹Àº ºóµµ¸¦ Â÷ÁöÇÏ´Â ¿°Áõ¼º ÁúȯÀÎ ¸¸¼ºÀü¸³¼±¿°Àº ¿øÀÎ, ¹ß»ý±âÀü
¹× Áø´Ü¹æ¹ý µî¿¡ ´ëÇؼ­ ¸¹Àº ³í¶õÀÌ ÀÖ´Â ½ÇÁ¤ÀÌ´Ù. ±× Áø´ÜÀº ÀϹÝÀûÀ¸·Î ÀÚ°¢Áõ»ó ¿ä°Ë
»ç, Àü¸³¼±¾× °Ë»ç, Àü¸³¼± ÃËÁø µîÀ¸·Î ÀÌ·ç¾îÁö³ª ÀÌµé °Ë»ç ¼ºÀûÀÌ ¼­·Î ºÎÇÕµÇÁö ¾Ê¾Æ
°ï¶õÇÑ ¶§°¡ °¡²û ÀÖ´Ù. µû¶ó¼­ ÀúÀÚµéÀº »ó´ëÀûÀ¸·Î ¿¬±¸°¡ ºÎÁ·ÇÑ ¸¸¼º Àü¸³¼±¿° ȯÀÚ¸¦
´ë»óÀ¸·Î °¢°¢ÀÇ »öµµÇ÷¯ ¿µ»ó ¼Ò°ß, Àü¸³¼± ºÐºñ¾× ¼Ò°ß, Ç÷·ùÀÇ ¾çÀû º¯È­ ¹× Ç÷·ù¼ÓµµÁö
¼ö µîÀ» ºñ±³ºÐ¼®ÇÔÀ¸·Î½á ¸¸¼ºÀü¸³¼±¿°ÀÇ Áø´Ü¿¡ ÀÖ¾î °æÁ÷Àå »öµµÇ÷¯ ÃÊÀ½ÆÄ°Ë»çÀÇ À¯¿ë
¼º°úÀÇÀǸ¦ ¾Ë¾Æº¸°íÀÚ ÇÏ¿´´Ù.
#ÃÊ·Ï#
Purpose : To evaluate the significance of color Doppler ultrasonography in patients of
chronic prostatitis.
Materials and Methods : We analysed the pattern of color Doppler images and
quantitative changes of vascular flow and flow velocity parameters(FVP) using a 7.0
MHz transrectal probe with findings of expressed prostatic secretion (EPS) from 22
patients with clinically suspected chronic prostatitis and 12 controls with clinically
suspected prostatodynia retrospectively.
Results : Compared with 2 groups according to color Doppler flow grade, higher
grades(grade 2 or 3) of flow increase were more frequently seen in prostatitis
group(54.5%) than in control group(33.3%)(p<0.05). But no significant difference was
found in flow velocity parameter(FVP: maximal flow velocity, minimal flow velocity,
resistive index, and pulsatility index) between control and prostatitis group. Two months
later follow up ultrasonography of 5 cases in the prostatitis group after treatment, all of
5 cases showed decrease the color Doppler flow compared with the initial color Doppler
image grade.
Conclusions : Grading of the amount of color flow with Doppler ultrasonography is of
limited significance at efficacy decision after treatment in chronic prostatitis. But
precaution should be taken to use color Doppler ultrasonography as objective diagnostic
tool, although higher grades of flow increase were more frequently seen in prostatitis
group than control group.

Å°¿öµå

Color Doppler flow; Flow velocity parameter; Prostatitis;

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

   

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed
KAMS