Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Àü¸³¼±ºñ´ëÁõ¿¡¼­ TUNAÀÇ Ä¡Çè Transurethral Needle Ablation of BPH

´ëÇѺñ´¢±â°úÇÐȸÁö 1998³â 39±Ç 10È£ p.1006 ~ 1010
ÇöÁ¤Çö, Á¤Àç¿ë, ³ëÃæÈñ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
ÇöÁ¤Çö (  ) 
ÀÎÁ¦´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ºñ´¢±â°úÇб³½Ç

Á¤Àç¿ë (  ) 
ÀÎÁ¦´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ºñ´¢±â°úÇб³½Ç
³ëÃæÈñ (  ) 
ÀÎÁ¦´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ºñ´¢±â°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract

°á·Ð
1956³â 10¿ùºÎÅÍ 1997³â 12¿ù±îÁö º»¿ø ºñ´¢±â°ú¿¡¼­ Àü¸³¼±ºñ´ëÁõÀ¸·Î Áø´ÜµÇ¾î TUNA
¸¦ ½Ã¼ú¹ÞÀº 26¸í Áß 6°³¿ù±îÁö ÃßÀû°üÂûÀÌ °¡´ÉÇß´ø 20¸íÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î Áõ»óÁ¡¼ö, Æò±Õ ÃÖ°í
¿ä¼Ó, »ýÈ°¸¸Á·µµ µîÀ» ºñ±³ °üÂûÇÏ¿© ºñ±³Àû ¸¸Á·ÇÒ ¸¸ÇÑ °á°ú¸¦ ¾ò¾ú´Ù.
Àü¸³¼± Á¶Á÷¿¡¼­ÀÇ TUNA½Ã¼úÀÇ Àå±âÀûÀÎ Ä¡·áÈ¿°ú´Â ¾ÆÁ÷ È®½ÇÈ÷ ±Ô¸íµÇ¾î ÀÖÁö ¾ÊÁö
¸¸ TUNA½Ã¼ú°ú ¿¬°üµÈ ÇÕº´ÁõÀÌ °ÅÀÇ ¾ø°í ƯÈ÷ ¼º±â´É Àå¾ÖÀÇ À§ÇèÀÌ ¾ø´Â ÀåÁ¡À» Áö³à
µ¿¹ÝÁúȯ µîÀ¸·Î ÀÎÇÏ¿© ¼ö¼úÀÇ À§Ç輺ÀÌ ³ôÀº ³ë·ÉÀÇ È¯ÀÚ¿Í ¼º»ýÈ°ÀÌ °¡´ÉÇÑ ºñ±³Àû ÀþÀº
ȯÀÚ¿¡ À־ È¿°úÀûÀÌ°í ¾ÈÀüÇÑ ¼ö¼ú¹æ¹ýÀ¸·Î »ý°¢µÈ´Ù.
#ÃÊ·Ï#
Purpose : Transurethral resection of prostate(TURP) is the gold standard for the
treatment of benign prostate hyperplasia(BPH) at the present. But many attempts have
been made to develop minimally invasive method. We studied the efficacy of
transurethral needle ablation(TUNA) of prostate for treatment of BPH.
Materials and Methods : We performed TUNA in 20 BPH patients including 13 patients
with acute urinary retention. Preoperatively all patients were evaluated using urinary
flow rates, International Prostate Symptom Score(1-PSS), Quality of life and cystoscopic
examination. The urinary flow rates, 1-PSS and Quality of life were checked at 1, 3 and
6 months after TUNA in all patients.
Results : The average value of peak flow rate of the patients with urinary retention
were 10§¢/sec, 12§¢/sec and 13§¢/sec at 1, 3 and 6 months follow-up. The average
value of Qmax of the patients without urinary retention were 9§¢/sec preoperatively and
increased to 13§¢/sec, 13§¢/sec and 14§¢/sec at 1, 3 and 6 months postoperatively.
1-PSS of patients with urinary retention improved from average 26 at preoperation to
14, 13, 10 at 1, 3 and 6 months postoperatively. Quality of life of patients with urinary
retention improved from average 5 at preoperation to 2, 2, 2 at 1, 3 and 6 months
postoperatively. The average value of patients without urinary retention improved from
average 26, 5 at preoperation to 14, 11, 11 and 2, 2, 2 at 1, 3 and 6 months follow-up.
No patients complained of erectile dysfunction and retrograde ejaculation postoperatively.
Conclusions : The result of our preliminary study suggest that TUNA can be
considered to be a simple, safe and efficacious procedure for the treatment of BPH
including urinary retention.

Å°¿öµå

Benign prostate hyperplasia; Transurethral needle ablation;

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

   

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed
KAMS