Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

°æÇÇÀû ³»½Å¿ìÀý°³¼ú-¼º°ø·ü¿¡ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ÀÎÀÚ Percutaneous Antegrade Endopyelotomy-Factors Influencing the Success Rates

´ëÇѺñ´¢±â°úÇÐȸÁö 1998³â 39±Ç 11È£ p.1077 ~ 1082
ÀÌÈ­¼º, À̱ټ®, ì°åÕßµ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
ÀÌÈ­¼º (  ) 
°¡Å縯´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ºñ´¢±â°úÇб³½Ç

À̱ټ® (  ) 
°¡Å縯´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ºñ´¢±â°úÇб³½Ç
ì°åÕßµ (  ) 
°¡Å縯´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ºñ´¢±â°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract

¼­·Ð
ÃÖ±Ù ³»½Å¿ìÀý°³¼ú(endopyelotomy)Àº ½Å¿ì¿ä°üÀÌÇàºÎÇùÂøÀÇ ÀÏÂ÷Àû Ä¡·á¹æ¹ýÀ¸·Î »ç¿ëµÇ
°í ÀÖÀ¸¸ç ±× ºóµµ ¶ÇÇÑ Áõ°¡ Ãß¼¼¿¡ ÀÖ´Ù. ³»½Ã°æÀû ¼ö¼ú¹ýÀº °üÇ÷Àû ¹æ¹ý¿¡ ºñÇÏ¿© ¼ö¼ú
½Ã°£ÀÌ Âª°í ´ú ħ½ÀÀûÀÌ¸ç ½ÇÇ÷ÀÌ ÀûÀ» »Ó ¾Æ´Ï¶ó ÀÔ¿ø±â°£À» ´ÜÃà½Ãų ¼ö ÀÖÀ¸¸ç ¼ú ÈÄ
ȸº¹±â°£ÀÌ Âª¾Æ¼­ ÀÏ»ó»ýÈ°¿¡·ÎÀÇ º¹±Í°¡ ºü¸£´Ù´Â ÀåÁ¡À» °¡Áö°í ÀÖ´Ù.
ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ¼ö¼ú¹æ¹ýÀº Davls¿¡ ÀÇÇØ ½ÃÇàµÈ ¿ä°üÀý°³ Èĺθñ¼³Ä¡¼ú(intubated ureterotomy)
¿¡ ±× ±Ù¿øÀ» µÎ°íÀÖ´Ù. ÀÌÈÄ ÃÖÃÊ·Î Wickham°ú KelletÀÌ °æÇÇÀû ½Å·ç¸¦ ÅëÇØ ³»½Ã°æ Á÷½Ã
ÇÏ¿¡¼­ urethrotomeÀ» »ç¿ëÇÏ¿© ÇùÂøºÎÀ§ÀÇ Àý°³¸¦ ½ÃÇàÇÏ°í ¿ä°üºÎ¸ñÀ» ¼³Ä¡ÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç,
Badlani µîÀº ÀÌ ¼ö¼ú¹æ¹ýÀ» º¸ÆíÈ­½ÃÅ°¸é¼­ óÀ½À¸·Î ¡®endopyelotomy¡¯¶ó´Â ¿ë¾î¸¦ »ç¿ë
ÇÏ¿´´Ù. À̷κÎÅÍ ³»ºñ´¢±â°úÀû ¼ö¼ú¿¡ ´ëÇÑ »õ·Î¿î ±â¼ú°ú ±â±¸µéÀÇ ±Þ¼ÓÇÑ °³¹ß°ú ÇÔ²²
³»½Å¿ìÀý°³¼úÀÇ ¼º°ø·üÀÌ °üÇ÷Àû ¼ö¼úÀÇ ¼º°ø¸¦¿¡ ±ÙÁ¢ÇÏ°Ô µÇ¾ú°í ³»½Ã°æÀû Àý°³¼úÀÇ ¼º°ø
·ü¿¡ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ÀÎÀÚµéÀ» ¹ß°ßÇÏ¿© ¼ö¼ú ¼º°ø·üÀ» ³ôÀÌ·Á´Â ³ë·ÂÀÌ ÁøÇàµÇ¾ú´Ù. ³»½Å¿ì
Àý°³¼úÀÇ ¼º°ø·ü¿¡ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¥ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ÀÎÀÚµé·Î´Â ÇùÂøÀÇ ¿øÀÎ, Àý°³¹æ¹ý, ¿ä°üºÎ¸ñÀÇ Å©
±â¿Í À¯Ä¡±â°£ µîÀ» µé ¼ö Àִµ¥, ÃÖ±Ù Àý°³¹æ¹ý¿¡ µû¸¥ ¼º°ø·üÀº cold knife¿Í electric
knife »ç¿ë½Ã °¢°¢ÀÇ ¼º°ø·üÀÌ À¯»çÇÏ°Ô ³ªÅ¸³ª°í ÀÖÀ¸¸ç ¼ú ÈÄ ¿ä°üºÎ¸ñÀÇ À¯Ä¡±â°£Àº 6ÁÖ
°¡ °¡Àå º¸ÆíÈ­µÇ¾î ÀÖ´Ù. ¹Ý¸é, ½Å¿ì¿ä°üÀÌ ÇàºÎÇùÂøÀÇ ¿øÀΰú ³»½Å¿ìÀý°³¼ú°úÀÇ °ü°è¿¡ ´ë
Çؼ­ MillanµîÀº ¼Ó¹ß¼ºÇùÂø¿¡¼­ ´õ ³ôÀº ¼ö¼ú ¼º°ø·üÀ» º¸°íÇÑ ¹Ý¸é Kletscher µîÀº ¿ø¹ß
¼ºÇùÂø¿¡¼­ ´õ ³ôÀº ¼º°ø·üÀ» º¸°íÇÏ¿´°í Clayman°ú Picus ±×¸®°í MahoneyµîÀº ¿ä°üºÎ¸ñ
ÀÇ Å©±â°¡ Ŭ¼ö·Ï ¼ö¼ú¼º°ø·üÀÌ ³ô´Ù°í ÁÖÀåÇÑ ¹Ý¸é Ramsay µî°ú Weaver´Â ³Ê¹« ±¸°æÀÌ
±½°í Å« ºÎ¸ñÀº ¿ä°üÀÇ ÇãÇ÷¼º±«»ç·Î ÀÎÇØ ¿ÀÈ÷·Á ¿ä°üÇùÂøÀ» Àç¹ß½ÃŲ´Ù°í ¼³¸íÇϴµî Çù
ÂøÀÇ ¿øÀο¡ µû¸¥ ¼ö¼ú ¼º°ø·ü°úÀÇ »ó°ü°ü°è ¹× ÀÌ»óÀûÀÎ ¿ä°üºÎ¸ñÀÇ Å©±â¿¡ ´ëÇؼ­´Â ¾ÆÁ÷
±îÁö ÀÇ°ßÀÌ ºÐºÐÇÏ´Ù.
ÀÌ¿¡ ÀúÀÚµéÀº 1989³âºÎÅÍ ÃÖ±Ù±îÁö º»¿ø¿¡¼­ ÇÑ ¼úÀÚ¿¡ ÀÇÇØ ½ÃÇàµÈ ³»½Å¿ìÀý°³¼ú 53·Ê
Áß ÃßÀû°üÂûÀÌ °¡´ÉÇÏ¿´´ø 47·Ê¸¦ ºÐ¼® ÇÔÀ¸·Î½á ÀüüÀûÀÎ ¼ö¼ú ¼º°ø·ü ¹× ÀÌ ¼ö¼úÀÇ ¼º°ø
·ü¿¡ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ÀÎÀÚµéÀ» ¾Ë¾Æº¸°íÀÚ ÇÑ´Ù.
#ÃÊ·Ï#
Purpose: Endopyelotomy is a minimally invasive surgical alternative to the classic open
surgery in the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction with similar success rates.
We analyzed factors influencing success rates after endopyelotomy based on clinical
data.
Materials and Methods: Between 1989 and 1997, we performed percutaneous antegrade
endopyelotomy in 53 cases of ureteropelvic junction obstructions. Among these patients,
47 patients have been followed with range from 3 to 70 months(mean 18.1 months). Of
the 47 patients, 36 had primary UPJ obstruction and 11 had secondary UPJ obstruction.
A rigid urethrotome(cold knife) was employed in 31 cases, a electrotome(hot knife) in
10 and a balloon dilator in 6. A stent(14/7Fr endopyelotomy stent or 6Fr double-J stent)
was placed for 4 to 12 weeks after the procedure. Coexisting stones or infundibular
strictures were managed simultaneously.
Results: Overall success rate(measured by symptom-free status and improved
uroradiographic findings) was 80.9%(86.1% in primary and 63.6% in secondary cases).
Success rates related to the method of incision were as follows; 87.1% with a cold
knife, 80% with a electric knife and 50% with a balloon dilator only. 14/7Fr
endopyelotomy stent was used in 21 patients with a successful outcome in 19(90.5%),
while 25 received 6Fr double stent with a successful outcome in 18(72%). Success rates
according to the duration of stenting were as follows; 86.7% in the 8-week group, 78.6%
in the 6-week group and 66.7% in the 4-week group.
Conclusions: Our experience indicates that endopyelotomy can be selected as the initial
procedure of choice for the selected patients with UPJ obstruction. The small number of
patients in each parameter did not reach statistical significance. However, there was a
trend for better results in patients with primary UPJ obstruction and with the use of
14/7Fr endopyelotomy stent.

Å°¿öµå

Endopyelotomy; Ureteropelvic junction obstruction; Stent; Success rate;

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

   

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed
KAMS