Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

°æ¿äµµÀü¸³¼±Àü±â±âÈ­¼úÀÌ Ç÷û ÀüÇØÁú, »ïÅõÁú ³óµµ ¹× ½ÇÇ÷·®¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ Effects of Transurethral Electrovaporization on Serum Electrolyte, Osmolality and Blood Loss

´ëÇѺñ´¢±â°úÇÐȸÁö 1998³â 39±Ç 11È£ p.1109 ~ 1113
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
³ëµ¿¿ì/Dong Woo Ro ±è°©º´/±è´öÀ±/¹ÚÀç½Å/±èºÀÀÏ/Kap Byung Kim/Duk Youn Kim/Jae Sin Park/Bong Il Kim

Abstract

¼­·Ð
Àü¸³¼±ºñ´ëÁõÀº ¸¸¼ºÁúȯÀÇ ºóµµ°¡ ³ôÀº 60¼¼ ÀÌ»óÀÇ ³ë³âÃþ¿¡ ¹ß»ýÇϸç, ȯÀÚÀÇ »îÀÇ Áú
À» ÀúÇϽÃÅ°´Â ÁúȯÀ¸·Î ÃÖ±Ù ¿ì¸® ³ª¶ó¿¡¼­µµ °í·É Àα¸ÀÇ Áõ°¡·Î Àü¸³¼± ºñ´ëÁõ ȯÀÚÀÇ
¼ö°¡ Áõ°¡ÇÏ°í ÀÖ¾î, »çȸÀû °ü½É°ú Ä¡·á¸¦ À§ÇÑ ³ë·ÂÀÌ °íÁ¶µÇ°í ÀÖ´Â ½ÇÁ¤ÀÌ´Ù. Àü¸³¼±ºó
´ëÁõ Ä¡·á·Î´Â ÀüÅëÀûÀ¸·Î ¥á-blocker¿Í 5¥á-reductase inhbitor µîÀÇ ¾à¹°¿ä¹ý°ú °æ¿äµµÀü
¸³¼±ÀýÁ¦¼úÀ» Æ÷ÇÔÇÑ ¼ö¼ú¿ä¹ýÀÌ ÀÖ°í, dz¼±È®Àå¼ú, ½ºÅÙÆ® »ðÀÔ¼ú, ¿Â¿­¿ä¹ý, ·¹ÀÌÀú¿ä¹ý,
°æ¿äµµÄ§¹Ú¸®¼ú(TUNA) µî ¿©·¯ Á¾·ùÀÇ Àúħ½ÀÀû Ä¡·á¹ýÀÌ °³¹ß Àû¿ëµÇ¾î ¿ÔÀ¸³ª °æ¿äµµÀü
¸³¼±ÀýÁ¦¼úÀÌ ÇöÀç Ç¥ÁØÀû ¼ö¼ú ¹æ¹ýÀ¸·Î °¡Àå ¸¹ÀÌ ½Ã¼úµÇ°í ÀÖ´Ù. ±×·¯³ª °æ¿äµµÀü¸³¼±Àý
Á¦¼úÀº ¼úÁß ¸¹Àº ¾çÀÇ °ü·ù¾×ÀÌ Èí¼öµÇ¾î Àú³ªÆ®·ýÇ÷Áõ°ú Àú»ïÅõÁú³óµµ·Î ÀÎÇÑ ¿äµµÀü¸³¼±
ÀýÁ¦¼úÈÄ ÁõÈıº ¹× ¼úÁß, ¼úÈÄ ÃâÇ÷·Î ÀÎÇÑ ºÎÀÛ¿ëÀÌ »ý±æ ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù. ÀÌ¿¡ º» ±³½Ç¿¡¼­´Â Àü
¸³¼±Áõ Á¶Á÷À» ±âÈ­½ÃÅ°´Â Àü±â±âÈ­¼ú(electrovaporization)À» ½ÃÇàÇÏ¿© °ü·ù¾×ÀÇ Èí¼ö·Î ÀÎ
ÇÑ ¼úÁß ¹× ¼úÈÄ ÀüÇØÁú, »ïÅõÁú ³óµµÀÇ º¯È­¿Í ÃâÇ÷¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâÀ» °æ¿äµµÀü¸³¼±ÀýÁ¦¼ú
°ú ºñ±³ °üÂûÇÏ¿´´Ù.
#ÃÊ·Ï#
Purpose: We did electrovaporization to reduce the absorbed volume of irrigant and
bleeding during TURP, and compared the effects on intraoperative and postoperative
serum electrolyte, osmolality, and blood loss between this method and the classic TURP.
Materials and Methods: Of the 45 BPH patients, 21 patients underwent TURP (Group
¥°), while the other 24 patients were electrovaporized with vaportrode(Group ¥±). They
were followed preoperatively, 30 min intraoperatively, immediate postoperatively, 6 hours
and 24 hours postoperatively with measurements of serum sodium, potassium, glucose
and BUN. The amount of absorbed irrigant, serum osmolality, effective osmolality, blood
loss were calculated and compared between the two groups.
Results: Although the group ¥± showed a longer operation time and used a larger
amount of irrigant than the group ¥°, there was not a significant difference in the
amount of blood loss between the two groups and lesser amount of irrigant was
absorbed than the group ¥°. There was not a significant decrease in postoperative
serum Hb and Hct level compared with preoperative level in the group ¥±. Serum
sodium level were significantly decreased during postoperative period every patients in
the group ¥°. The serum osmolality and effective osmolality levels were significantly
decreased postoperatively as compared with the preoperative levels in the group ¥°, but
were not in the group ¥±.
Conclusions: These results show that electrovaporization may be the effective method
in preventing complications such as hyponatremia and hypoosmolality during
perioperative period. This method may also be helpful in reducing blood loss.

Å°¿öµå

Benign prostatic hyperplasia; Electrovaporization; Serum electrolytes; Osmolality; Blood loss;

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

   

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed
KAMS