Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

º¹¸·³» Á¢±Ù¹æ¹ý¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ º¹°­°æÇÏ ¹æ±¤Çö¼ö¼ú Laparoscopic Burch Colposuspension (Transperitoneal Approach)

´ëÇѺñ´¢±â°úÇÐȸÁö 1998³â 39±Ç 11È£ p.1118 ~ 1122
ÁøÁ¤¿ë, ±è Á¤,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
ÁøÁ¤¿ë (  ) 
¼º±Õ°ü´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ »ï¼º¼­¿ïº´¿ø

±è Á¤ (  ) 
¼º±Õ°ü´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ºñ´¢±â°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract

¼­·Ð
º¹¾Ð¼º ¿ä½Ç±ÝÀº ÃÖ´ë¿äµµ¾ÐÀÌ»ó º¹¾Ð Áõ°¡¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ ¼Òº¯ÀÇ À¯ÃâÀ» ÀǹÌÇÑ´Ù. ´ëºÎºÐÀÇ ¿ä
½Ç±Ý ȯÀÚ´Â ÇغÎÇÐÀûÀÎ ¿ä½Ç±ÝÀ» ³ªÅ¸³»Áö¸¸ ¿äµµ¿Í ¹æ±¤ÀÇ ÇÏ°­Àº ¿äµµ°ñ¹ÝÀδ븦 Æ÷ÇÔÇÑ
Ç×¹®°Å±Ù°ú ¿äµµÁÖÀ§ °áüÁ¶Á÷¿¡ ÀÇÇØ À¯ÁöµÇ´Â ÁöÁö¸¦ »ó½ÇÇÏ¿© 2Â÷ÀûÀ¸·Î ¹ß»ýÇÑ´Ù. Áø¼º
º¹¾Ð¼º ¿ä½Ç±ÝÀÇ Ä¡·á¸¦ À§ÇØ ¸¹Àº ¼ö¼úÀû ¹æ¹ýµéÀÌ ÀÖÀ¸¸ç Å©°Ô 2°¡Áö·Î ³ª´©¸é º¹ºÎ¸¦ Åë
ÇÑ ±³Á¤¼ú°ú ÁúÀ» ÅëÇÑ ±³Á¤¼ú·Î ³ª´­ ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù. º¹ºÎ¸¦ ÅëÇÑ ±³Á¤¼ú·Î´Â
Marshall-Maichetti-Krantz, Burch¼ú½Ä µîÀÌ ÀÖÀ¸¸ç ÁúÀ» ÅëÇØ ¹Ù´ÃÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ±³Á¤¼ú·Î´Â
Pereyra, Stamey¿Í Raz¼ú½Ä µîÀÌ ÀÖ´Ù. ÀÌ ¹æ¹ýµéÀº ¹æ±¤°æºÎ¿Í Èĺο䵵ÀÇ ÇغÎÇÐÀûÀÎ ±¸
Á¶ º¯È­¸¦ ±³Á¤ÇÏ¿© ¹æ±¤, ¹æ±¤°æºÎ, Èĺο䵵¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â º¹¾ÐÀ» µ¿ÀÏÇÏ°Ô ¸¸µé¾îÁÖ´Â °ÍÀÌ
´Ù.
¼ú±â¿Í ±â±¸ÀÇ ¹ß´Þ·Î ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ¿ä½Ç±ÝÀ» ±³Á¤Çϱâ À§ÇÑ ¼ö¼ú ¹æ¹ýµéÀº º¸´Ù ºñħ½ÀÀûÀÎ º¹
°­°æÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ°Ô µÇ¾ú´Ù. º¹°­°æÀº °³º¹¼ú½Ä°ú °°ÀÌ °ßÀλ縦 Á÷Á¢ º¸¸é¼­ ¹æ±¤°æºÎ¿Í ±ÙÀ§
ºÎ¿äµµ¸¦ °áÂûÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ¸¸ç °³º¹¼ú±âÀÇ ´ÜÁ¡°ú ȸº¹±â°£À» ÃÖ¼ÒÈ­Çϸ鼭 ½ÃÇàÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù´Â
ÀåÁ¡ÀÌ ÀÖ´Ù. º¹°­°æ Burch¼ú±â¿¡´Â º¹°­À» ÅëÇÑ Á¢±Ù°ú º¹°­¿Ü Á¢±Ù¹æ¹ýÀÌ »ç¿ëµÇ°í ÀÖ´Ù.
º¹°­¿Ü ¹æ¹ýÀÌ ÇغÎÇÐÀûÀÎ ¹Ú¸®°¡ Àû°í ÀüÅëÀûÀÎ °³º¹ Burch¼ú½Ä°ú °°´Ù°í ±ÇÀåÇÏÁö¸¸ º¹
¸·³» ¹æ¹ýÀº ƯÈ÷ ÇϺ¹ºÎ¼ö¼úÀÇ °ú°Å·ÂÀÌ Àְųª ȤÀº µ¿½Ã¿¡ ÀÚ±ÃÀýÁ¦¼ú, ³­¼ÒÀýÁ¦¼ú°ú °°
Àº º¹°­³» ´Ù¸¥ ÁúȯÀÌ ÀÖ¾î ¼ö¼úÀ» ½ÃÇàÇÒ ¶§ ±ÇÀåµÇ¾î ¿Ô´Ù. ¿ì¸®´Â ÀÌ ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­ º¹¸·³»
º¹°­°æ Burch¼ú½ÄÀ» 15¸í¿¡¼­ ½ÃÇàÇÏ¿© ±× ÀåÁ¡À» °üÂûÇÏ¿´´Ù.
#ÃÊ·Ï#
Purpose: The Burch bladder neck suspension is a effective treatment for stress urinary
incontinence due to hypermobility. To assess the safety, effectiveness and potential
benefits of the transperitoneal laparoscopic Burch colposuspension.
Materials and Methods: We assessed the short-term result of 15 patients who
underwent a laparoscopic Burch colposuspension with transperitoneal approach. All
patients had stress incontinence with bladder neck hypermobility and no cystocele and
rectocele. The 14 patients had coexisting disorder(uterine myoma 11, ovarian cyst 2,
carcinoma in situ 1), so concomitant operation was performed 14 cases(laparoscopic
assisted vaginal hysterectomy 12, laparoscopic assisted ovarian cystectomy.
Results: In 15 patient who underwent the laparoscopic procedure, continent in 11(73%),
improved in 1 (6%) and failed in 3(20%) with mean follow-up of 14 months (range
6-18). The mean operation time was 81 minutes(range 70-120), mean postoperative
hospital stay was 4.8 days(range 3-7).
Conclusions: Laparoscopic colposuspension with the transperitoneal approach is a
reasonable alternative in treating stress urinary incontinence, especially when the
patients have previous properitoneal or lower abdominal surgery or concomitant operation
for coexisting disease. Early results are similar to those of open and needle suspension
techniques, although longer follow-up is necessary to determine longterm efficiency.

Å°¿öµå

Stress urinary incontinence; Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension; Transperitoneal approach;

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

   

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed
KAMS