Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¿©¼º º¹¾Ð¼º¿ä½Ç±Ý ȯÀÚ¿¡¼­ ÁúÀüº®½½¸µ¼ö¼ú ÈÄ ¹è´¢°ï¶õÀÇ À§ÇèÀÎÀÚ¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸ Predicting Factors Prolonged Voiding Difficulties after Anterior Vaginal Wall Sling

´ëÇѺñ´¢±â°úÇÐȸÁö 1999³â 40±Ç 1È£ p.79 ~ 83
¿øÈ£¼®, À̱Լº, ±èÁؼö,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
¿øÈ£¼® (  ) 
¼º±Õ°ü´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ºñ´¢±â°úÇб³½Ç

À̱Լº (  ) 
¼º±Õ°ü´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ºñ´¢±â°úÇб³½Ç
±èÁؼö (  ) 
¼º±Õ°ü´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ºñ´¢±â°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract

¼­·Ð
¿©¼º º¹¾Ð¼º¿ä½Ç±ÝÀÇ Ä¡·á¿¡¼­ ¼ö¼úÀº Á¶±â ¼º°ø·üÀÌ 80%-50%ÀÎ È¿°úÀûÀÎ ¹æ¹ýÀÌ´Ù. ±×
·¯³ª ¿ä½Ç±Ý¼ö¼ú ÈÄ ¹ß»ýÇÏ´Â ÇÕº´Áõ Áß ÀϽÃÀûÀÎ ¹è´¢°ï¶õ°ú ¿äÆó´Â 30%-50%±îÁö º¸°íµÇ
´Â ÈçÇÑ ÇÕº´ÁõÀ¸·Î ȯÀڵ鿡°Ô ¸¹Àº ºÒÆíÀ» ÁÖ¾î ¿Ô°í, ½ÉÁö¾î´Â ȯÀÚµéÀÌ ¿ä½Ç±Ý¿¡ ´ëÇÑ
¼ö¼úÄ¡·á¸¦ ±âÇÇÇÏ´Â ¿øÀÎÀÌ µÇ¾î ¿Ô´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ Àå±â°£ÀÇ µµ´¢°ü À¯Ä¡³ª ÀÚ°¡µµ´¢¸¦ ÇÊ¿ä·Î
ÇÏ°í, ÀÌ¿¡ µû¸¥ ¿ä·Î°¨¿°ÀÇ Áõ°¡, ÀÔ¿ø±â°£ÀÇ ¿¬Àå ¹× ¿Ü·¡ ¹æ¹® Ƚ¼öÀÇ Áõ°¡¸¦ ÃÊ·¡ÇÏ¿©
ȯÀڵ鿡°Ô Á¤½ÅÀûÀ¸·Î ¶Ç´Â °æÁ¦ÀûÀ¸·Î ¸¹Àº ºÒÆíÀ» ÁÖ¾î¿Ô´Ù. ¼ö¼ú ÈÄ ¹è´¢Àå¾Ö°¡ ÃÊ·¡µÉ
ȯÀÚ¸¦ ¼ö¼ú Àü¿¡ ¹Ì¸® ¿¹ÃøÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù¸é Ä¡·á¹æ¹ý °áÁ¤¿¡ µµ¿òÀ» ÁÖ°í, ȯÀÚ¿Í ¼ö¼úÀÚ°¡
¼ú ÈÄ Àå±â°£ÀÇ ¹æ±¤ µµ´¢°ü À¯Ä¡³ª °£ÇæÀûµµ´¢¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Áغñ¸¦ ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ» °ÍÀÌ´Ù. ¿ä½Ç±Ý
¼ö¼ú ÈÄ ¹è´¢°ï¶õ¿¡ °ü°èµÇ´Â ÀÎÀڷδ ȯÀÚÀÇ ³ªÀÌ, ¹è´¢±Ù¼öÃà¾Ð°ú ¿ä¼Ó, ¿©¼ºÈ£¸£¸óÀÇ »ó
ŵîÀÌ º¸°íµÇ°í ÀÖ´Ù.
ÃÖ±Ù º¹¾Ð¼º¿ä½Ç±Ý ȯÀÚ¿¡¼­ ´Ü¼øÇϸ鼭µµ È¿°úÀûÀÎ ÁúÀüº®½½¸µ¼ö¼úÀÌ ¸¹ÀÌ ½ÃÇàµÇ°í ÀÖ
À¸³ª ÀÌ ¼ö¼ú ÈÄ ¹ß»ýÇÏ´Â ¹è´¢°ï¶õ À§ÇèÀÎÀÚ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¿¬±¸´Â ¾ø´Ù. µû¶ó¼­ ÀúÀÚµéÀº ÁúÀüº®
½½¸µ¼ö¼úÀ» ½ÃÇàÇÑ È¯ÀÚ¿¡°Ô¼­ ¼ö¼ú Àü¿¡ ¾òÀ» ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ¿©·¯ ÀÓ»óÀÎÀÚµéÀ» ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿© ¼ö¼ú
ÈÄ ¹è´¢°ï¶õÀ» ¿¹ÃøÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ÀÎÀÚ¸¦ ±Ô¸íÇÏ°íÀÚ ÇÏ¿´´Ù.
#ÃÊ·Ï#
Purpose: The objective of the study was to identify preoperative predictive factors of
prolonged bladder catheterization after anterior vaginal wall sling operation.
Materials and Methods: Eighty-seven patients who had undergone vaginal wall sling
to treat stress urinary incontinence were reviewed retrospectively. All had got
preoperative evaluations that included history, physical examination, voiding
cystourethrography and urodynamic study. Voiding difficulty was the main outcome
measure. This was determined by the time of suprapubic catheter removal. According to
the catheter removal time, we divided the patients into 3 groups: Group A(<10 days),
Group B(10-20 days), Group C(>20 days). Fourteen parameters of the patients in 3
groups were compared.
Results: Median duration of postoperative catheterization was 10 days (range 2 to 50).
There was no case of permanent urinary retention. Forty-five patients (52%) were free
of catheter within 10 days after operation(Group A). Group B consisted of 24 patients
(27%) and group C consisted of 18 patients(21%). There was no significant relationship
between preoperative parameters and the duration of catheterization.
Conclusions: We could not find any preoperative predictive factors that prolonged the
duration of postoperative catheterization. Risk of prolonged catheterization did not depend
on the patients characteristics. Other factors which have not been assessed in this
study, such as the amount of tension applied to the sling, should be evaluated as the
predictive factors in the further study.

Å°¿öµå

Urinary incontinence; Urodynamics; Surgery; Urinary retention;

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

   

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed
KAMS