Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

³óÃÌÁö¿ª ÁֹεéÀÇ »ýÈ°¾ç½Ä°ú Àü¸³¼±ºñ´ëÁõ°úÀÇ °ü·Ã¼º¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸ The Lifestyle Factors in Relation to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia in a Rural Community

´ëÇѺñ´¢±â°úÇÐȸÁö 1999³â 40±Ç 5È£ p.589 ~ 593
Á¶º´¸¸, Ãֹο¬, ¾ö¿ë¼·,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
Á¶º´¸¸ (  ) 
ºÎ»ê´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¿¹¹æÀÇÇб³½Ç

Ãֹο¬ (  ) 
ºÎ»ê´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ºñ´¢±â°úÇб³½Ç
¾ö¿ë¼· (  ) 
ºÎ»ê´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ºñ´¢±â°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract

°á·Ð
°æ»ó³²µµ ¿ï»ê½Ã ¿ïÁÖ±¸ µÎµ¿¸é Áö¿ªÁÖ¹ÎÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ÀÓ»óÀûÀ¸·Î Áø´ÜµÈ Àü¸³¼±ºñ´ëÁõ(Àü
¸³¼± ¹«°Ô>20gm, IPSS>7, ÃÖ´ë¿ä¼Ó<15§¢/sec)°ú ÀÏ»ó »ýÈ°¾ç½ÄÀÇ °ü·Ã¼ºÀ» ºÐ¼®ÇÑ °á°ú
Àü¸³¼±ºñ´ëÁõÀÇ À¯º´·üÀº °í·ÉÀÚÀϼö·Ï, ½Åüºñ¸¸Áö¼ö°¡ ³ôÀ»¼ö·Ï ³ô¾Ò°í À½½Ä¹°À» Â¥°Ô ¸Ô
´Â °æ¿ì¿Í ¾Æħ½Ä»ç¸¦ ±ÔÄ¢ÀûÀ¸·Î ÇÏÁö ¾Ê´Â °æ¿ì¿¡ ³ôÀº °æÇâÀ» º¸¿´´Ù. ±×·¯¹Ç·Î ¿ì¸®³ª
¶ó »ç¶÷µé¿¡¼­ Àü¸³¼±ºñ´ëÁõÀÇ °ü·Ã¿äÀÎÀ¸·Î¼­ »ýÈ°¾ç½ÄÀº Áß¿äÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î »ý°¢µÇ¸ç ´Ù¾çÇÑ
Á¢±Ù ¹æ¹ýÀ» ÅëÇÑ ¿¬±¸°¡ °è¼ÓÀûÀ¸·Î ÀÌ·ç¾îÁ®¾ß ÇÒ °ÍÀÌ´Ù.

Purpose : Little is known as to risk factors for benign prostatic hyperplasia(BPH),
especially in this country. We investigated lifestyle factors in relation to BPH.
Materials and Methods : We conducted population-based cross-sectional study
including men aged 50 years and older in a rural community and analyzed data on 195
men. BPH was defined as enlargement of the prostate gland of equivalent weight>20gm
in the presence of voiding symptoms(IPSS>7) and low urinary peak flow rate(<15§¢
/sec). Informations on the lifestyle factors were collected by direct personal interview
using structured questionnaire.
Results : Adjusted prevalence rate ratio was 1.11 for age(95% confidence interval, CI,
1.03-1.19), 1.16 for body mass index(95% CI 0.97-1.38), 2.46 for salty food intake(95% CI
0.83-7.34), 2.09 for skipping breakfast(95% CI 0.45-9.67).
Conclusions : These findings suggest that lifestyle factors may be important risk
factors for BPH in the community.

Å°¿öµå

Benign prostatic hyperplasia; Lifestyle factors; Rural community;

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

   

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed
KAMS