Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

°ø¿©½ÅÀûÃâ¼ú ÈÄ ÀÜÁ¸ ½Å±â´ÉÀÇ º¯È­¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ´Ü±â ÃßÀû °üÂû Short-term Follow-up of Renal Function after Donor Nephrectomy

´ëÇѺñ´¢±â°úÇÐȸÁö 1999³â 40±Ç 7È£ p.896 ~ 900
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
¹Úö±Ù/Cheol Geun Park À¯¼ºÇÏ/ÀÌÁ¾Áø/½Å±â¿ë/¹ÚÇØ¿µ/ÀÌÃá¿ë/¿ì¿µ³²/Seong Ha Yoo/Jong Jin Lee/Ki Yong Shin/Hae Young Park/Tchun Yong Lee/Young Nam Woo

Abstract

°á·Ð
º» ±³½Ç¿¡¼­´Â 1985³âºÎÅÍ 1996³â±îÁö °ø¿©½ÅÀûÃâ¼úÀ» ½ÃÇà ¹ÞÀº ȯÀÚ 413¸í Áß 1³â ÀÌ»ó
ÃßÀû °üÂûÀÌ °¡´ÉÇÏ¿´´ø 361¸íÀÇ È¯ÀÚ¸¦ ´ë»óÀ¸·Î °ø¿©½ÅÀûÃâ¼ú ÈÄ ÀÜÁ¸ ½Å±â´ÉÀÇ º¯È­¿¡
´ëÇØ ´Ü±â ÃßÀû °üÂûÇÏ¿© ´ÙÀ½°ú °°Àº °á·ÐÀ» ¾ò¾ú´Ù. Ç÷Áß BUN, creatinineÀº ¸ðµÎ ¼úÀü¿¡
ºñÇÏ¿© ¼úÈÄ 1³â±îÁö À¯ÀÇÇÏ°Ô Áõ°¡µÇ¾úÀ¸³ª Á¤»ó ¹üÀ§ ³»¿¡¼­ ¾ÈÁ¤µÇ¾î °¡´Â ¾ç»óÀ» º¸¿´
´Ù. 24½Ã°£ÀÇ creatinine clearance´Â ¼ö¼ú Á÷ÈĺÎÅÍ À¯ÀÇÇÏ°Ô °¨¼ÒµÇ¾úÀ¸³ª ¼úÈÄ 1³â°£ ¾ÈÁ¤
µÈ ¾ç»óÀ» º¸¿© ÁÖ¾ú°í, ¶ÇÇÑ 1³â ÈÄ¿£ ½Å±â´ÉÀÌ ´Ù¼Ò ȸº¹µÇ´Â ¾ç»óÀ» º¸¿´´Ù.
ÀÌ»óÀ¸·Î °ø¿©½ÅÀûÃâ¼ú ÈÄ ÀÜÁ¸ ½Å±â´ÉÀÇ ´Ü±âÀûÀÎ ¾ÈÀü¼ºÀº È®º¸µÈ °ÍÀ¸·Î »ý°¢µÇ¸ç ÀÜ
Á¸½ÅÀǺ¸´Ù Á¤È®ÇÑ ±â´É Æò°¡¸¦ À§Çؼ­´Â öÀúÇÑ Àå±â°£ÀÇ ÃßÀû °üÇÒ°ú ÀÜÁ¸½ÅÀÇ ±¸Á¶Àû,
±â´ÉÀû Ãø¸é¿¡¼­ÀÇ º¸´Ù ¸¹Àº ¿¬±¸°¡ ÇÊ¿äÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î »ý°¢µÈ´Ù.

Purpose: Eventhough cadaveric renal grafts are increasing, kidneys from living donors
remain as the major mode of renal transplantations and there is a need to establish
theoretical bases for securing the safety of the donors. Follow-up of donors was done
for a years using several indices of renal function to evaluate the function of the
remaining kidneys after donor nephrectomies.
Materials and Methods: Two hundred and sixty one living donors were included in
this study. Blood urea nitrogen(BUN), serum creatinine, 24 hour creatinine clearance, 24
hour urine protein, and blood pressure were checked preoperatively. The same indices
wore checked at cue, six, and twelve months after the operation. These indices were
compared with those before the operation.
Results: Although some increase was observed in serum BUN, creatinine, and 24hr
urine protein, and decrease in creatinine clearance after nephrectomies, all were within
normal limits, which did not show clinically significant differences. All indices did not
deviate from the normal limits through-out one year.
Conclusions: Renal indices varied wi)twin normal limits and donor nephrectomies
seemed to cause no significant harmful effect on the donors. Prospective and long term
follow-up of the donors after donor nephrectomies are needed to ensure a high quality
life of living donors.

Å°¿öµå

Donor nephrectomy; Renal function; Living donor;

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

   

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed
KAMS