Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Áø¼º º¹¾Ð¼º¿ä½Ç±Ý ȯÀÚ¿¡¼­ °³º¹, °æÁú½Ä, º¹°­°æÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ Burch ¼ö¼úÀÇ ºñ±³ Comparison Evaluation of Abdominal, Transvaginal and Laparoscopic Burch Colposuspension for Genuine Stress Incontinence

´ëÇѺñ´¢±â°úÇÐȸÁö 1999³â 40±Ç 9È£ p.1195 ~ 1199
¾ç½Â¿Á, ¹Ú¿µ°æ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
¾ç½Â¿Á (  ) 
ÀüºÏ´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç

¹Ú¿µ°æ (  ) 
ÀüºÏ´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ºñ´¢±â°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract

°á·Ð
ÀúÀÚµéÀº 67¸íÀÇ Áø¼º º¹¾Ð¼º¿ä½Ç±Ý ȯÀÚ¸¦ ´ë»óÀ¸·Î °³º¹, °æÁú½Ä, º¹°­°æÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ
Burch ¼ö¼úÀ» ºñ±³ÇÑ °á°ú, º¹°­°æÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ¼ú½ÄÀº µµ´¢°üÀ» Á¦°ÅÇϴµ¥ °É¸° ±â°£, ÀÔ¿ø
±â°£ µîÀ» ÁÙÀÓÀ¸·Î½á ´Ù¸¥ µÎ ±º¿¡ ºñÇØ ´ú ħ½ÀÀûÀÎ ¼ö¼úÀ̾úÀ¸¸ç µû¶ó¼­ ºñħ½ÀÀû Ä¡·á
¸¦ ¼±È£Çϴ ȯÀÚÀÇ °æ¿ì ÀûÇÕÇÑ ¼ö¼úÀ̶ó »ç·áµÈ´Ù. ±×·¯³ª ´Ù¸¥ ¼ú½Ä¿¡ ºñÇØ Åë°èÇÐÀûÀ¸
·Î ¼º°ø·ü¿¡ Â÷ÀÌ´Â ¾ø¾úÀ¸³ª, ¾à°£ ³·Àº ¼º°ø·üÀ» º¸Àδٴ Á¡°ú Ãß°¡ÀûÀÎ °æÁ¦ ºñ¿ë ºÎ´ã
ÀÇ ¹®Á¦°¡ ÀÖÀ¸¹Ç·Î ȯÀÚ¿Í ÃæºÐÈ÷ »ó´ã ÈÄ °áÁ¤ÇØ¾ß ÇÒ °ÍÀÌ´Ù. ¼úÈÄ 26°³¿ù° ÃßÀû °á°ú
°¢°¢ 90, 86, 76%¿¡¼­ Áõ»óÀÇ È£Àü ¶Ç´Â ¿ÏÄ¡»óŸ¦ º¸ÀÌ°í ÀÖÀ¸³ª ÃßÀû °üÂû ±â°£ÀÌ Âª¾Æ
¼­ ¾ÆÁ÷ ÁøÁ¤ÇÑ ÀǹÌÀÇ ¼ö¼ú ¼º°øÀ¸·Î ÆÇ´ÜÇϱ⿡´Â À̸¦ °ÍÀ¸·Î »ý°¢µÈ´Ù. ±×·¯³ª º» ¿¬±¸
°á°ú¿¡¼­ Burch ¼ö¼úÀº ±× Á¢±Ù ¹æ¹ý¿¡ °ü°è¾øÀÌ È¿°úÀûÀÎ ¿ä½Ç±Ý ±³Á¤ÀÌ °¡´ÉÇÑ ¼ú½ÄÀ̸ç,
º¹°­°æÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ Burch¼ö¼úÀÇ °æ¿ì ºñħ½ÀÀû Ä¡·á¸¦ ¿øÇϴ ȯÀÚ¿¡°Ô Àû¿ëÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ÇÑ°¡
Áö ¼ú½ÄÀÌ µÉ ¼ö ÀÖÀ» °ÍÀ¸·Î »ý°¢µÈ´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ º» ¿¬±¸¿¡ ÀÌÀº ÇâÈÄ ÃÖ¼Ò 5³â ÀÌ»óÀÇ Àå±âÀû
ÀÎ ÃßÀû °üÂûÀÌ ÇÊ¿äÇϸ®¶ó°í »ý°¢µÈ´Ù.

Purpose : Burch colposuspension has been used for the treatment of stress urinary
incontinence(SUI) with effectiveness. The purpose of this retrospective study was to
compare the efficacy among abdominal, transvaginal and laparoscopic Burch
colposuspension. We also compared the clinical course and complications after each
procedure.
Materials and Methods : Sixty seven patients underwent Burch colposuspension were
evaluated according to their approach methods. All patients were assessed for detailed
history, physical examination, urodynamic study, transperineal ultrasonography, operative
time, catheter indwelling period, hospital stays, success rate, and complications.
Results : The success rates of abdominal, transvaginal and laparoscopic Burch were
90, 86 and 76% respectively, at 26 months follow up. There was no significant
complication except for a case of bladder injury in the laparoscopy group. Laparoscopic
Burch operation had advantages of less invasive approach, less morbidity, shorter
hospital stays and provided successful outcomes in patients with stress urinary
incontinence.
Conclusions : With these results, we could conclude that open, transvaginal or
laparoscopic Burch operations were effective and safe for SUI with no significant
differences of efficacy according to approach methods.

Å°¿öµå

Burch colposuspension; Stress urinary incontinence;

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

   

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed
KAMS