Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Á¤·ù°íȯ°ú À½³¶¼öÁ¾¿¡¼­ ºÎ°íȯ ÀÌ»ó: Ãʻ󵹱⠰³¹æ Á¤µµ¿ÍÀÇ °ü°è Epididymal Anomalies in Cryptorchidism and Hydrocele: Association with Patent Processus Vaginalis

´ëÇѺñ´¢±â°úÇÐȸÁö 1999³â 40±Ç 9È£ p.1231 ~ 1234
À±Àç½Ä, ÀÌÁÖ¿µ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
À±Àç½Ä (  ) 
°è¸í´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ºñ´¢±â°úÇÐÀü½Ç

ÀÌÁÖ¿µ (  ) 
°è¸í´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ºñ´¢±â°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract

¼­·Ð
ºÎ°íȯ ÀÌ»óÀº Á¤·ù°íȯ ȯ¾ÆÀÇ 32-79%¿¡¼­ ¹ß°ßµÇ¸ç ƯÈ÷ °³¹æµÈ Ãʻ󵹱⸦ °¡Áø Á¤·ù
°íȯ ȯ¾Æ¿¡¼­ ±× ºóµµ°¡ ³ô¾Æ ºÎ°íȯ ÀÌ»óÀÌ °íȯÇÏ°­ ¹× °³¹æµÈ Ãʻ󵹱â¿Í °ü·ÃÀÌ ÀÖÀ½
À» ½Ã»çÇÏ°í ÀÖ´Ù. ±×·¯³ª Á¤»óÀûÀ¸·Î À§Ä¡ÇÑ °íȯ¿¡¼­ ºÎ°íȯ ÀÌ»óÀÇ ºóµµ´Â Àß ¾Ë·ÁÁ® ÀÖ
Áö ¾ÊÀ¸¸ç ¶ÇÇÑ Ãʻ󵹱⠰³¹æ Á¤µµ¿ÍÀÇ °ü°èµµ ºÐ¸íÄ¡ ¾Ê´Ù.
ÀÌ¿¡ ÀúÀÚµéÀº À½³¶¼öÁ¾°ú Á¤·ù°íȯ ȯ¾Æ¿¡¼­ Ãʻ󵹱âÀÇ °³¹æ Á¤µµ¿¡ µû¸¥ ºÎ°íȯ ÀÌ»ó
ÀÇ ºóµµ¸¦ Á¶»çÇÏ¿© °íȯÀÇ À§Ä¡¿¡ µû¸¥ ºÎ°íȯ ÀÌ»ó°ú Ãʻ󵹱⠰³¹æÁ¤µµ°£ÀÇ °ü°è¸¦ ¾Ë¾Æ
º¸°íÀÚ ÇÏ¿´´Ù.

Purpose : Epididymal anomalies in boys with an undescended testis have been well
documented and most undescended testes are associated with patent processus vaginalis.
However, the incidence of epididymal anomalies in descended testes has not well known.
We performed a prospective study to determine the relationship between epididymal
anomalies and patency of processus vaginalis in boys with hydrocele or cryptorchidism.
Materials and Methods : From January 1997 to February 1988, epididymal
morphologies and the degrees of patency of processus vaginalis(closed, partially closed
and open) were examined In 35 boys with hydrocele(37 testes) and 28 boys with
cryptorchidism(29 testes) at the surgeries.
Results : No epididymal anomaly was found in all 3 hydroceles with closed processus
vaginalis. Epididymal anomalies were found in 13 of 22 hydroceles with partially closed
processus vaginalis and in 9 of 12 hydroceles with open processes vaginalis. All boys
with undescended testes had open processus vagnialis and the epididymal anomalies
were found in 27 of 29 undescended testes. The incidence of epididymal anomalies was
highest in cryptorchid testes with open processes vaginalis and lowest in descended
testes with closed processus vaginalis. Furthermore, epididymal anomalies were found to
be more severe in association with more cranially located testes.
Conclusions : The higher incidence of epididymal anomalies were associated with
ipsilateral patency of processus vaginalis and testicular position. This finding suggests
that the role of the epididymis in testicular descent may not be essential.

Å°¿öµå

Epididymis; Processus vaginalis; Cryptorchidism; Hydrocele;

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

   

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed
KAMS