·Îº¿À» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ º¹°°æ ±ÙÄ¡Àû Àü¸³¼±ÀûÃâ¼ú
Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy
À̿뼺, ÇÑ¿õ±Ô, ¾ç½Âö, ³ª±ºÈ£,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
À̿뼺 ( Lee Yong-Seong )
¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ºñ´¢±â°úÇб³½Ç
ÇÑ¿õ±Ô ( Han Woong-Kyu )
¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ºñ´¢±â°úÇб³½Ç, ºñ´¢ÀÇ°úÇבּ¸¼Ò
¾ç½Âö ( Yang Seung-Choul )
¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ºñ´¢±â°úÇб³½Ç, ºñ´¢ÀÇ°úÇבּ¸¼Ò
³ª±ºÈ£ ( Rha Koon-Ho )
¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ºñ´¢±â°úÇб³½Ç
KMID : 0358320060470020206
Abstract
In recent years, robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (rLRP) has emerged as a feasible treatment option for patients with organ-confined prostate cancer. We first performed rLRP in the republic of Korea and report our technique and outcome. Our patient was a 69-year-old man presenting with a T1a adenocarcinoma, a 4 (2+2) Gleason score and 1.37ng/ml preoperative serum prostate specific antigen. A rLRP was performed with the da VinciTM robot system (Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Mountain View, USA) which has a total of seven degrees of motion (six degrees of freedom and grip) EndoWrist instrumentation. The total operative time was 420 minutes, and the robot set-up time including port insertion was 80 minutes. The estimated blood loss was 200ml. The pathological examination showed a stage T2a, with a 4 (2+2) Gleason score and negative
surgical margins. A rLRP confers the benefits of enhanced precision and dexterity for complex laparoscopic work in the pelvic cavity. (Korean J Urol 2006;47:206-210)
Å°¿öµå
Robotics;Laparoscopy;Prostatectomy
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸