º¹°°æÇÏ ¿ä°üÀý¼®¼ú: ¿ä°ü°á¼® Ä¡·á¹ýÀ¸·Î¼ÀÇ ¿ªÇÒ
Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy has a Role for Treating Ureteral Stones
À̿뼺, À̵¿ÈÆ, ÇÑ¿õ±Ô, ±èÇüÁØ, ¾ç½Âö, ³ª±ºÈ£,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
À̿뼺 ( Lee Yong-Seong )
¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ºñ´¢±â°úÇб³½Ç
À̵¿ÈÆ ( Lee Dong-Hoon )
¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ºñ´¢±â°úÇб³½Ç
ÇÑ¿õ±Ô ( Han Woong-Kyu )
¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ºñ´¢±â°úÇб³½Ç
±èÇüÁØ ( Kim Hyung-Joon )
¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ºñ´¢±â°úÇб³½Ç
¾ç½Âö ( Yang Seung-Choul )
¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ºñ´¢±â°úÇб³½Ç
³ª±ºÈ£ ( Rha Koon-Ho )
¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ºñ´¢±â°úÇб³½Ç
KMID : 0358320060470050498
Abstract
Purpose: Shock wave lithotripsy(SWL) and ureteroscopy are used to successfully manage the majority of ureteral stones. However, some large and impacted ureteral stones still require surgery. Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy has emerged as a feasible treatment option for the patients with large and impacted ureteral stone.
Materials and Methods: Between December 2004 and October 2005, laparoscopic ureterolithotomy was performed in 12 patients who required surgical treatment. In four patients, laparoscopy was carried as a salvage procedure after failed SWL, and laparoscopy was performed in seven patients as a primary procedure for treating large and impacted stones. The mean stone size was 16mm(range: 8-28).
Results: All the procedures were completely laparoscopically, and all the patients were rendered stone-free after a single procedure; no complications were encountered. The mean operative time was 132.5 minutes (range: 60-220), and the mean estimated blood loss was 100ml(range: 50- 150). The mean postoperative hospital stay was 4.3 days(range: 2-7).
Conclusions: Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy can be a safe and effective treatment for large and impacted stones. In selected cases, it should be considered as a primary procedure for large and impacted ureteral stones that are located at the mid and upper levels of the ureter, including renal pelvic stones. (Korean J Urol 2006;47:498-501)
Å°¿öµå
Laparoscopy;Urinary stone;Ureter
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸