Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

±ÙÄ¡Àû Àü¸³¼±ÀûÃâ¼ú Àü È£¸£¸ó Ä¡·á°¡ »ýÈ­ÇÐÀû Àç¹ß¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ The Effect of Neoadjuvant Hormonal Treatment in Prostate Cancer on Biochemical Recurrence

´ëÇѺñ´¢±â°úÇÐȸÁö 2007³â 48±Ç 11È£ p.1125 ~ 1130
¼Û°­Çö, ¹ÚÈ«ÁÖ, ÇÑÁö¿¬, À¯Ã¢Èñ, ¾ÈÇÑÁ¾, ±èû¼ö,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
¼Û°­Çö ( Song Kang-hyon ) 
¿ï»ê´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¼­¿ï¾Æ»êº´¿ø ºñ´¢±â°úÇб³½Ç

¹ÚÈ«ÁÖ ( Park Hong-Zoo ) 
¿ï»ê´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¼­¿ï¾Æ»êº´¿ø ºñ´¢±â°úÇб³½Ç
ÇÑÁö¿¬ ( Han Ji-Yeon ) 
¿ï»ê´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¼­¿ï¾Æ»êº´¿ø ºñ´¢±â°úÇб³½Ç
À¯Ã¢Èñ ( Yoo Chang-Hee ) 
¿ï»ê´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¼­¿ï¾Æ»êº´¿ø ºñ´¢±â°úÇб³½Ç
¾ÈÇÑÁ¾ ( Ahn Han-Jong ) 
¿ï»ê´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¼­¿ï¾Æ»êº´¿ø ºñ´¢±â°úÇб³½Ç
±èû¼ö ( Kim Choung-Soo ) 
¿ï»ê´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¼­¿ï¾Æ»êº´¿ø ºñ´¢±â°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract


Purpose: When combined with surgery, neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (NHT) has not demonstrated a significant benefit for meaningful clinical endpoints such as progression-free survival or overall survival. We evaluated the effect of NHT on prostate cancer.

Materials and Methods: From 1995 to 2004, 519 patients underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy(RRP). One-hundred thirty of them were included in this retrospective case-control study and they were assessed for age, the preoperative prostate-specific antigen(PSA) level, the clinical stage and the biopsy Gleason score(GS). The subjects were divided into two groups: the RRP only group(n=65) and the NHT group(n=65), and these were matched for the 3 above mentioned parameters. The protocols for NHT were maximal androgen blockade(n=40), antiandrogen only(n=8), and LHRH analogue only(n=17). Biochemical recurrence was defined as a level of serum PSA of 0.2ng/ml or greater on 2 consecutive evaluations.

Results: The mean age of the RRP only group and the NHT group was 64.2 and 63.5, respectively(p£¾0.05). The rates of a positive surgical margin and biochemical recurrence in the NHT group were 49.2% and 42.5%, respectively, and they were 46.2% and 46.2%, respectively, in RRP only group, and there was no statistical difference between the two groups. In high risk patients(clinical stage¡ÃT3, biopsy GS¡Ã8, serum PSA£¾20ng/ml), NHT group was not differences compared with the RRP group. Neither the duration (3 months vs. 6 months) of NHT nor the regimens of NHT improved the clinical and surgical outcome.

Conclusions: NHT did not improve biochemical recurrence and the positive surgical margin

Å°¿öµå

Prostate cancer;Neoadjuvant therapy;Recurrence

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

   

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed
KAMS