Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Is the Index Finger and Ring Finger Ratio (2D:4D) Reliable Predictor of Semen Quality?

´ëÇѺñ´¢±â°úÇÐȸÁö 2010³â 51±Ç 3È£ p.208 ~ 211
¼­ÇØÆò, Kim Kyeon-Young, ³ëÁØ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
¼­ÇØÆò ( Seo Hae-Pyoung ) 
Á¶¼±´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ºñ´¢±â°úÇб³½Ç

 ( Kim Kyeon-Young ) 
Á¶¼±´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ÀçÈ°ÀÇÇб³½Ç
³ëÁØ ( Rho Joon ) 
Á¶¼±´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ºñ´¢±â°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract


Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to test the validity of hypothesis that the index finger and ring finger ratio (2D:4D) is related with men¡¯s semen quality.

Materials and Methods: We set two groups of healthy young male student (mean age 23.9) who have different 2D:4D ratio from different departments of Chosun University. One group consists of 26 men whose 2D:4D ratio is higher than 1 (mean 1.06), and the other group consists of 33 men whose 2D:4D ratio is lower than 1 (mean 0.94). Their semen was collected by masturbation and examined.

Results: A comparative analysis revealed that there is no relation between semen quality and the 2D:4D ratio. The group of 2D:4D¡Ã1 showed a semen volume of 3.66¡¾1.64 ml, on the other hand, the group of 2D:4D<1 showed a semen volume of 3.73¡¾1.40 ml. No statistical correlation was found (p=0.82). The view of sperm count and motile sperm in single ejaculated semen also showed no statistically significance with 2D:4D ratio (p=0.84, p=0.43, respectively).

Conclusions: The 2D:4D ratio has no statistically significant correlation with the semen quality of health young male. Thus, measurements of finger length cannot be a reliable indicator of semen quality and testicular function.

Å°¿öµå

Fingers;Semen analysis

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

   

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed
KAMS