Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

The Evolution of Surgical Treatment for Female Stress Urinary Incontinence: Era of Mid-Urethral Slings

´ëÇѺñ´¢±â°úÇÐȸÁö 2010³â 51±Ç 4È£ p.223 ~ 232
ÀÌ¿µ¼÷, ÀÌÇϳª, À̱Լº,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
ÀÌ¿µ¼÷ ( Lee Young-Suk ) 
¼º±Õ°ü´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¸¶»ê»ï¼ºº´¿ø ºñ´¢±â°úÇб³½Ç

ÀÌÇϳª ( Lee Ha-Na ) 
¼º±Õ°ü´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ »ï¼º¼­¿ïº´¿ø ºñ´¢±â°úÇб³½Ç
À̱Լº ( Lee Kyu-Sung ) 
¼º±Õ°ü´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ »ï¼º¼­¿ïº´¿ø ºñ´¢±â°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract


Based on the integral theory, tension-free placement of a mid-urethral sling (MUS) for female stress urinary incontinence (SUI) has gained substantial popularity owing to the ease of the procedure and its effectiveness. Published series with long-term follow-up show continence rates after the MUS procedure ranging from 70% to 80%. Complication rates after MUS procedures are usually low. This review aimed to describe the historical change and the current use of the MUS. We discuss the efficacy and complications of various MUS procedures and the current strategies for managing failed slings.

Å°¿öµå

Stress urinary incontinence;Tension-free vaginal tape;Trans-obturator tape

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

   

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed
KAMS