Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

The Effects of Combination Perianal-Intrarectal Lidocaine-Prilocaine Cream and Periprostatic Nerve Block for Pain Control during Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Biopsy of the Prostate: A Randomized, Controlled Trial

´ëÇѺñ´¢±â°úÇÐȸÁö 2010³â 51±Ç 7È£ p.463 ~ 466
³ëµ¿ÈÆ, ¹ÚÇü±Ù, Á¶¹Îö, ÀÌÇØ¿ø, À̱¤¼ö,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
³ëµ¿ÈÆ ( Noh Dong-Hoon ) 
µ¿±¹´ëÇб³ Àϻ꺴¿ø ºñ´¢±â°ú

¹ÚÇü±Ù ( Park Hyoung-Keun ) 
°Ç±¹´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ºñ´¢±â°úÇб³½Ç
Á¶¹Îö ( Cho Min-Chul ) 
µ¿±¹´ëÇб³ Àϻ꺴¿ø ºñ´¢±â°ú
ÀÌÇØ¿ø ( Lee Hae-Won ) 
µ¿±¹´ëÇб³ Àϻ꺴¿ø ºñ´¢±â°ú
À̱¤¼ö ( Lee Kwang-Soo ) 
µ¿±¹´ëÇб³ Àϻ꺴¿ø ºñ´¢±â°ú

Abstract


Purpose: Prostate biopsy for diagnosing cancer can be painful. The efficacy and safety of combination perianal-intrarectal lidocaine-prilocaine (PILP) cream and periprostatic nerve block were compared with nerve block alone during transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-Bx).

Materials and Methods: From October 2007 to August 2009, 74 men undergoing a transrectal prostate biopsy were randomized into two groups. In group 1, 36 patients received a combination of PILP cream and a periprostatic nerve block; and in group 2, 38 patients received lubricant jelly and a periprostatic nerve block. Thirty minutes later, the TRUS-Bx was performed. Pain was evaluated by a 10-point visual analogue scale (VAS) after the biopsy.

Results: Patients in group 1 showed a significantly lower VAS score than patients in group 2 (mean score 2.22¡¾0.89 vs. 3.02¡¾1.15, p<0.001). In addition, there was a difference in the number of patients that had a pain score of three or more, 44% in group 1, and 65% in group 2. The overall complication rate was similar in both groups (p=0.45).

Conclusions A combination of PILP cream and periprostatic nerve block reduced pain compared to the periprostatic nerve block alone. This safe, simple technique can be considered prior to TRUS-Bx to reduce patient discomfort.

Å°¿öµå

Analgesia;Biopsy;Pain;Prostate

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

   

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed
KAMS