Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Single Positive Core Prostate Cancer in a 12-Core Transrectal Biopsy Scheme: Clinicopathological Implications Compared with Multifocal Counterpart

´ëÇѺñ´¢±â°úÇÐȸÁö 2010³â 51±Ç 10È£ p.671 ~ 676
¾ÈÈ«Àç, °í¿µÈÖ, ÀåÈƾÆ, °­¼º±¸, °­¼®È£, ¹ÚÈ«¼®, ÀÌÁ¤±¸, ±èÁ¦Á¾, ÀüÁØ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
¾ÈÈ«Àç ( Ahn Hong-Jae ) 
°í·Á´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ºñ´¢±â°úÇб³½Ç

°í¿µÈÖ ( Ko Young-Hwii ) 
°í·Á´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ºñ´¢±â°úÇб³½Ç
ÀåÈƾƠ( Jang Hoon-Ah ) 
°í·Á´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ºñ´¢±â°úÇб³½Ç
°­¼º±¸ ( Kang Sung-Gu ) 
°í·Á´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ºñ´¢±â°úÇб³½Ç
°­¼®È£ ( Kang Seok-Ho ) 
°í·Á´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ºñ´¢±â°úÇб³½Ç
¹ÚÈ«¼® ( Park Hong-Seok ) 
°í·Á´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ºñ´¢±â°úÇб³½Ç
ÀÌÁ¤±¸ ( Lee Jeong-Gu ) 
°í·Á´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ºñ´¢±â°úÇб³½Ç
±èÁ¦Á¾ ( Kim Je-Jong ) 
°í·Á´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ºñ´¢±â°úÇб³½Ç
ÀüÁØ ( Cheon Jun ) 
°í·Á´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ºñ´¢±â°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract


PurposeThe incidence of single positive core prostate cancer at the time of biopsy appears to be increasing in the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) era. To determine the clinical implication of this disease, we analyzed surgical and pathological characteristics in comparison with multiple positive core disease.

Materials and MethodsAmong 108 consecutive patients who underwent robotic radical prostatectomy following a diagnosis of prostate cancer based on a 12-core transrectal biopsy performed by the same method in a single institute, outcomes from 26 patients (Group 1) diagnosed on the basis of a single positive biopsy core and from 82 patients (Group 2) with multiple positive biopsy cores were analyzed.

ResultsThe preoperative PSA value, Gleason score, prostate volume, and D¡¯Amico¡¯s risk classification of each group were similar. The proportion of intermediate+highrisk patients was 69.2% in Group 1 and 77.9% in Group 2 (p=0.22). Total operative time and blood loss were similar. Based on prostatectomy specimens, only 3 patients (11.5%) in Group 1 met the criteria for an indolent tumor (7.31% in Group 2). Although similarities were observed during preoperative clinical staging (p=0.13), the final pathologic stage was significantly higher in Group 2 (p=0.001). The positive-margin rate was also higher in Group 2 (11.5% vs. 31.7%, p=0.043). Despite similarity in upstaging after prostatectomy in each group (p=0.86), upgrading occurred more frequently in Group 1 (p=0.014, 42.5% vs. 19.5%). No clinical parameters were valuable in predicting upgrading.

ConclusionsMost single positive core prostate cancer diagnoses in 12-core biopsy were clinically significant with similar risk stratification to multiple positive core prostate cancers. Although the positive-margin rate was lower than in multiple positive core disease, an increase in Gleason score after radical prostatectomy occurred more frequently.

Å°¿öµå

Biopsy;Prostatectomy;Prostatic neoplasms

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

   

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed
KAMS