Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgeries: A Single-Center Experience of 171 Consecutive Cases

´ëÇѺñ´¢±â°úÇÐȸÁö 2011³â 52±Ç 1È£ p.31 ~ 38
ÃÖ°æÈ­, ÇÔ¿ø½Ä, ³ª±ºÈ£, ÀÌÁ¦¿ø, ÀüȲ±Õ, Arkoncel Francis Raymond P., ¾ç½Âö, ÇÑ¿õ±Ô,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
ÃÖ°æÈ­ ( Choi Kyung-Hwa ) 
Yonsei University College of Medicine Department of Urology

ÇÔ¿ø½Ä ( Ham Won-Sik ) 
Yonsei University College of Medicine Department of Urology
³ª±ºÈ£ ( Rha Koon-Ho ) 
Yonsei University College of Medicine Department of Urology
ÀÌÁ¦¿ø ( Lee Jae-Won ) 
Yonsei University College of Medicine Department of Urology
ÀüȲ±Õ ( Jeon Hwang-Gyun ) 
CHA University CHA Bundang Medical Center Department of Urology
 ( Arkoncel Francis Raymond P. ) 
Yonsei University College of Medicine Department of Urology
¾ç½Âö ( Yang Seung-Choul ) 
Yonsei University College of Medicine Department of Urology
ÇÑ¿õ±Ô ( Han Woong-Kyu ) 
Yonsei University College of Medicine Department of Urology

Abstract


Purpose: We report our experience to date with 171 patients who underwent laparoendoscopic single-site surgery for diverse urologic diseases in a single institution.

Materials and Methods: Between December 2008 and August 2010, we performed 171 consecutive laparoendoscopic single-site surgeries. These included simple nephrectomy (n=18; robotic surgeries, n=1), radical nephrectomy (n=26; robotic surgeries, n=2), partial nephrectomy (n=59; robotic surgeries, n=56), nephroureterectomy (n=20; robotic surgeries, n=12), pyeloplasty (n=4), renal cyst decortications (n=22), adrenalectomy (n=4; robotic surgeries, n=2), ureterolithotomy (n=10), partial cystectomy (n=3), ureterectomy (n=1), urachal mass excision (n=1), orchiectomy (n=1), seminal vesiculectomy (n=1), and retroperitoneal mass excision (n=1). All procedures were performed by use of a homemade single-port device with a wound retractor and surgical gloves. A prospective study was performed to evaluate outcomes in 171 cases.

Results: Of the 171 patients, 98 underwent conventional laparoendoscopic single-site surgery and 73 underwent robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery. Mean patient age was 53 years, mean operative time was 190.8 minutes, and mean estimated blood loss was 204 ml. Intraoperative complications occurred in seven cases (4.1%), and postoperative complications in nine cases (5.3%). There were no complications classified as Grade IIIb or higher (Clavien-Dindo classification for surgical complications). Conversion to mini-incision open surgery occurred in seven (4.1%) cases. Regarding oncologic outcomes, no cancer-related events occurred during follow-up other than one aggressive progression of Ewing sarcoma.

Conclusions: Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery is technically feasible and safe for various urologic diseases; however, surgical experience and long-term follow-up are needed to test the superiority of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery.

Å°¿öµå

Kidney; Laparoscopy; Minimally invasive surgical procedures; Robotics; Ureter

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

   

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed
KAMS