Delayed Presentation of Intravesical Bone Penetration after Pelvic Ring Fracture
±èÁ¤ÈÆ, ÇÏ¿ëÂù, ±èÅÂÇü, ¸í¼øö, ¹®¿µÅÂ, ±è°æµµ, ÀåÀÎÈ£,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
±èÁ¤ÈÆ ( Kim Jung-Hoon )
Chung-Ang University College of Medicine Department of Urology
ÇÏ¿ëÂù ( Ha Yong-Chan )
Chung-Ang University College of Medicine Department of Orthopaedic Surgery
±èÅÂÇü ( Kim Tae-Hyoung )
Chung-Ang University College of Medicine Department of Urology
¸í¼øö ( Myung Soon-Chul )
Chung-Ang University College of Medicine Department of Urology
¹®¿µÅ ( Moon Young-Tae )
Chung-Ang University College of Medicine Department of Urology
±è°æµµ ( Kim Kyung-Do )
Chung-Ang University College of Medicine Department of Urology
ÀåÀÎÈ£ ( Chang In-Ho )
Chung-Ang University College of Medicine Department of Urology
KMID : 0358320120530120887
Abstract
Retrograde cystography and computed tomography (CT) are considered the gold standard for investigating bladder and pelvic bone injury. However, these methods can miss extraperitoneal bladder rupture caused by a penetrating bone fragment from a pelvic bone fracture. We experienced a routine conventional cystography and CT scan that failed to identify penetration of the bladder by a bone fragment, which thus delayed optimal treatment. Therefore, different diagnostic methods such as CT cystography or cystoscopy should be considered to rule out penetrating injury by a bony fragment in patients with extraperitoneal bladder rupture.
Å°¿öµå
Delayed diagnosis; Injuries; Pelvic bones; Urinary bladder
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸