Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Delayed Presentation of Intravesical Bone Penetration after Pelvic Ring Fracture

´ëÇѺñ´¢±â°úÇÐȸÁö 2012³â 53±Ç 12È£ p.887 ~ 889
±èÁ¤ÈÆ, ÇÏ¿ëÂù, ±èÅÂÇü, ¸í¼øö, ¹®¿µÅÂ, ±è°æµµ, ÀåÀÎÈ£,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
±èÁ¤ÈÆ ( Kim Jung-Hoon ) 
Chung-Ang University College of Medicine Department of Urology

ÇÏ¿ëÂù ( Ha Yong-Chan ) 
Chung-Ang University College of Medicine Department of Orthopaedic Surgery
±èÅÂÇü ( Kim Tae-Hyoung ) 
Chung-Ang University College of Medicine Department of Urology
¸í¼øö ( Myung Soon-Chul ) 
Chung-Ang University College of Medicine Department of Urology
¹®¿µÅ ( Moon Young-Tae ) 
Chung-Ang University College of Medicine Department of Urology
±è°æµµ ( Kim Kyung-Do ) 
Chung-Ang University College of Medicine Department of Urology
ÀåÀÎÈ£ ( Chang In-Ho ) 
Chung-Ang University College of Medicine Department of Urology

Abstract


Retrograde cystography and computed tomography (CT) are considered the gold standard for investigating bladder and pelvic bone injury. However, these methods can miss extraperitoneal bladder rupture caused by a penetrating bone fragment from a pelvic bone fracture. We experienced a routine conventional cystography and CT scan that failed to identify penetration of the bladder by a bone fragment, which thus delayed optimal treatment. Therefore, different diagnostic methods such as CT cystography or cystoscopy should be considered to rule out penetrating injury by a bony fragment in patients with extraperitoneal bladder rupture.

Å°¿öµå

Delayed diagnosis; Injuries; Pelvic bones; Urinary bladder

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

   

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed
KAMS