Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Efficacy of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Pediatric and Adolescent Urolithiasis

´ëÇѺñ´¢±â°úÇÐȸÁö 2013³â 54±Ç 12È£ p.865 ~ 869
ÁöÁØ¿±, ±è¼öµ¿, Á¶¿ø¿­,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
ÁöÁØ¿± ( Jee Joon-Yeop ) 
Dong-A University College of Medicine Department of Urology

±è¼öµ¿ ( Kim Soo-Dong ) 
Dong-A University College of Medicine Department of Urology
Á¶¿ø¿­ ( Cho Won-Yeol ) 
Dong-A University College of Medicine Department of Urology

Abstract


Purpose:To retrospectively evaluate the efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) by age and current condition as a first-line treatment for pediatric and adolescent urolithiasis.

Materials and Methods:The computerized records of 55 children were retrospectively reviewed from March 1991 to July 2007. The children were below 18 years of age and had undergone ESWL monotherapy for urolithiasis. There were 36 boys (65.5%) and 19 girls (34.5%), with a mean age of 8.5 years (range, 0.5-18 years). There were 24 patients aged 7 years or less and 31 patients aged more than 7 years.

Results:The mean size of the stones was 9.48 mm (range, 4-22 mm). The overall success rate of ESWL was 90.9% (50 children). The mean number of ESWL sessions was 2.02 (range, 1-10). The mean number of ESWL sessions for the patient group aged 7 years or less was 1.16 (range, 1-2) and that for the patient group aged more than 7 years was 2.97 (range, 1-10; p=0.037). There was also a statistically significant difference in the mean number of ESWL sessions between the younger and older patients who needed general anesthesia (1.16 vs. 2.2 sessions, respectively; 0.042).

Conclusions:In the patient group aged 7 years or less, the number of ESWL sessions and the complication rate were comparable with those for endoscopic management. Thus, ESWL is an effective first-line treatment modality for patients aged less than 7 years.

Å°¿öµå

Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy; Pediatric urolithiasis

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

   

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed
KAMS