Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¿©¼º ´ëº¯½Ç±Ý¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¿¬±¸ A Study Female of Fecal Incontinence

´ëÇÑ»êºÎÀΰúÇÐȸÁö 1999³â 42±Ç 12È£ p.2749 ~ 2753
À±Çý¿ø, ¹èö¼º,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
À±Çý¿ø (  ) 
µ¿±¹´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ »êºÎÀΰúÇÐ

¹èö¼º (  ) 
µ¿±¹´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ »êºÎÀΰúÇÐ

Abstract

¸ñÀû: ´ëº¯½Ç±ÝÀ̶õ °¡½º ¶Ç´Â ´ëº¯ÀÇ ºÒ¼öÀÇÀûÀÎ ¹èÃâÀ» ¸»Çϸç Áú½ÄºÐ¸¸Àº ´ëº¯½Ç±ÝÀ» ÀÏÀ¸Å°´Â °¡Àå Áß¿äÇÑ ¿øÀÎÀÌ´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸´Â ºÐ¸¸·Â ¹× ºÐ¸¸ ¹æ¹ý¿¡ µû¸¥ ´ëº¯½Ç±ÝÀÇ ºóµµ¸¦ Á¶»ç, ºÐ¼®ÇÔÀ¸·Î½á »ê°úÀÇ·Î ÇÏ¿©±Ý ºÐ¸¸ ¹æ¹ýÀÇ ¼±Åÿ¡ ½ÅÁßÀ» °¡ÇÔÀ¸·Î½á ÀÌÀÇ ¿¹¹æ ¹× °³¼±À» µµ¸ðÇÏ°íÀÚ ½ÃÇàµÇ¾ú´Ù.
¿¬±¸¹æ¹ý: 1996³â 1¿ùºÎÅÍ 1998³â 12¿ù±îÁö µ¿±¹´ëÇб³ Æ÷Ç׺´¿ø »êºÎÀΰú¿¡ ÀÔ¿ø, ºÐ¸¸ÇÑ »ê¸ð 213¸í ¹× ºÐ¸¸ °æÇèÀÌ ¾ø´Â ¿Ü·¡¸¦ ¹æ¹®ÇÑ È¯ÀÚ 40¸íÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ´ëº¯½Ç±ÝÀÇ ºóµµ¸¦ Á¶»çÇÏ¿´´Ù. ºÐ¸¸ °æÇèÀÌ ÀÖ¾ú´ø ±ºÀº ù Áú½ÄºÐ¸¸±º, 2ȸ ÀÌ»óÀÇ Áú½ÄºÐ¸¸±º, ù Á¦¿ÕÀý°³¼ú¸¸À¸·Î ºÐ¸¸ÇÑ ±º, ù Áú½ÄºÐ¸¸ÈÄ Á¦¿ÕÀý°³¼ú·Î ºÐ¸¸ÇÑ ±ºÀ¸·Î ³ª´©¾î ºóµµ¸¦ Á¶»çÇÏ¿´´Ù. ´ëº¯½Ç±ÝÀÇ Á¤µµ´Â °¡½º°¡ Èû¾øÀÌ ½½½½ ³ª¿À´ÂÁö, °¡½º¸¦ ÂüÀ» ¼ö ¾ø°í ´ëº¯ÀÌ ¼Ó¿Ê¿¡ °¡²û ¹¯´ÂÁö, º¯ÀǸ¦ ´À³¢¸é ÂüÀ» ¼ö ¾ø´ÂÁö, º¯ÀÌ ´Ã ¼Ó¿Ê¿¡ ¹¯´ÂÁö µîÀ¸·Î ³ª´©¾î Áú¹®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ ´ëº¯½Ç±ÝÀ» È£¼ÒÇÏ´Â °æ¿ì »ê°úÀû ÇÕº´ÁõÀ» ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù.
°á°ú: ´ëº¯½Ç±Ý ºóµµ´Â ºÐ¸¸ °æÇèÀÌ ¾ø´Â °æ¿ìº¸´Ù ºÐ¸¸ °æÇèÀÌ ÀÖ´Â °æ¿ì ÇöÀúÈ÷ Áõ°¡ÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç(P<0.O5), ù Áú½ÄºÐ¸¸ÇÑ ±º(6.8%, 3/44)°ú ù Á¦¿ÕÀý°³¼ú¸¸À¸·Î ºÐ¸¸ÇÑ °æ¿ì(2.1%, 1/48)º¸´Ù 2ȸ ÀÌ»ó Áú½ÄºÐ¸¸ÇÑ ±º(11.7%, 9/77)°ú ù Áú½ÄºÐ¸¸ÈÄ Á¦¿ÕÀý°³¼ú·Î ºÐ¸¸ÇÑ ±º(18.1%, 8/44)¿¡¼­ À¯ÀǼº ÀÖ°Ô Áõ°¡ÇÔÀÌ ¹àÇôÁ³´Ù(P<0.05). ´ëº¯½Ç±ÝÀ» È£¼ÒÇÏ´Â °æ¿ì »ê°úÀû ÇÕº´ÁõÀ¸·Î´Â ºÐ¸¸ 2±âÀÇ ¿¬Àå, Ç×¹®°ý¾à±ÙÀÇ ÆÄ¿­, ÈíÀԺи¸, °Å´ë¾Æ µîÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù.
°á·Ð: ´ëº¯½Ç±ÝÀ» ¿¹¹æÇϱâ À§Çؼ­´Â ³­»êÀÇ ¿¹¹æÀÌ Áß¿äÇϸç ù Áú½ÄºÐ¸¸ÈÄ ¶Ç´Â ù Áú½ÄºÐ¸¸ÈÄ Á¦¿ÕÀý°³¼ú·Î ºÐ¸¸ÇÑ ÈÄ ´ëº¯½Ç±ÝÀ» È£¼ÒÇÏ´Â °æ¿ì¿¡´Â ´ÙÀ½ ºÐ¸¸½Ã ºÐ¸¸ ¹æ¹ýÀÌ ½ÅÁßÈ÷ °í·ÁµÇ¾î¾ß ÇÑ´Ù.

Objectives: To evaluate the effect of parity & delivery method on female fecal incontinence.
Method: Based on 213 cases of 4 different delivery method and 40 cases of one non-delivery group, a retrospective analysis of the prevalence of female fecal incontinence, between January 1996 and December 1998, was done. With delivery mode, 4 different groups were: first vaginal delivery group , two or more vaginal deliveries group, first cesarean section group, and first vaginal delivery followed by cesarean section group. All subjects were examined by questionaire or phone about the experience of fecal incontinence after delivery. In cases of fecal incontinence , we reviewed the obstetric complications with medical records.
Result: There was no fecal incontinence in the non-delivery group. The incidence of fecal incontinence in the two or more vaginal delivery group(11.7%, 9/77) and the first vaginal delivery followed by cesarean section group(18.1%, 8/44) was higher than the first vaginal delivery group(6.8%, 3/44), and the first cesarean section group(2.1 %, 1/48)(P<0.05). The obstetric complications in fecal incontinence cases were: a prolonged second stage, anal sphincter laceration, vacuum extraction, a large baby etc.
Conclusion: Fecal incontinence was significantly correlated with the number of vaginal deliveries and obstetric complications during delivery. Fecal incontinence after the first vaginal delivery or vaginal delivery followed by cesarean section are very important factors in choosing the next delivery method.

Å°¿öµå

´ëº¯½Ç±Ý;ºÐ¸¸ ¹æ¹ý;ºÐ¸¸·Â;Fecal incontinence;Delivery method;Parity

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed
KAMS